Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I would like to have some feedback on the d jetro version of the pfc.

I am going to be building a very high hp r32 gtr over the next year and I have no intention of using maf sensors.

I recently came across a 1034 rwhp r33 gtr that used a d jetro ecu.

I liked my previous l jetro pfc so i thought i would like to use a pfc again but this time with d jetro and datalogit

Would i be better of with a ecu such as microtech, tec 3 or anything else?

Edited by icydude
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143350-pfc-d-jetro-opinions/
Share on other sites

If you have proper size AFM for your terget power. L-jetro is nothing to lose I beleive. If you do not have it, you have to use D-jetro is much better. Max power is almost same both of them if suction of a air is same condition. Any ECU are same. But the measurement of the air suction is most important thing for the power and response of the engine. AFM is on time measure but D is after suction a air.

head a read of the PFC FAQ in my signature, it covers the djetro vs ljetro pfc's. worth a read

Sure have :P

I am a frequent visitor to your site for the last year i would have to say.

I was really hoping for opinions from those who have tuned them or drive with them.

I wont have space for any mafs.

The turbo's life is shorter on a D Jetro ...this is why I did not take this path.

For the figures you are looking at though it is the best option...for value for money that is.

But if you are well cashed up, thats another thing :P

What are you planning to use it for?Track or Drag

To my readings the turbos are not limited by the air flow meters and are spinning at higher revs

to begin with...this is why responce is quicker.thus turbo life is shorter.

Most of the WA guys swear by the better set up using the D Getro vertion of the power-fc.

Correct me if any one actually has heard different. :P

To my readings the turbos are not limited by the air flow meters and are spinning at higher revs

to begin with...this is why responce is quicker.thus turbo life is shorter.

Most of the WA guys swear by the better set up using the D Getro vertion of the power-fc.

Correct me if any one actually has heard different. :P

AFM dont' control turbo i believe.

Maybe turbo life shorter because you don't use the AFM anymore, don't use air filter either (like the crazy jap) so sometime flies got suck through! ;).

To my readings the turbos are not limited by the air flow meters and are spinning at higher revs

to begin with...this is why responce is quicker.thus turbo life is shorter.

Most of the WA guys swear by the better set up using the D Getro vertion of the power-fc.

Correct me if any one actually has heard different. :)

wrong. :P

AFMs dont limit turbos at all.

Its jsut the WA tuner in question gets better results.

Same as a Vic tuner gets excellent results here using AFM's

Its just the ECU that the tuner is comfy using.

AFM's are not a limitation

I've heard that D-jetro pfc is a very crude ECU. lumopy idle, bad fuel consumption. It is used only in high hp applications as afm cannot read tha high air flow even the Q45 ones....It is not recomended for hp which is manageable bt afm.. anywas out of curiosity does D-jetro veersion comes in witht he MAP sensor or have to buy seperately.

I think D-jetro is the cheapest out of all the pfcs

I've heard that D-jetro pfc is a very crude ECU. lumopy idle, bad fuel consumption. It is used only in high hp applications as afm cannot read tha high air flow even the Q45 ones....It is not recomended for hp which is manageable bt afm.. anywas out of curiosity does D-jetro veersion comes in witht he MAP sensor or have to buy seperately.

I think D-jetro is the cheapest out of all the pfcs

you buy the djetro pfc and commander for 71000 yen. Then you need to buy the djetro sensor kit and harness which is another 33000 yen.

I've heard that D-jetro pfc is a very crude ECU. lumopy idle, bad fuel consumption. It is used only in high hp applications as afm cannot read tha high air flow even the Q45 ones....It is not recomended for hp which is manageable bt afm.. anywas out of curiosity does D-jetro veersion comes in witht he MAP sensor or have to buy seperately.

You've "heard" a lot of bunkas

You've "heard" a lot of bunkas

ahh you are basing this comment on? which part of my response is bull ~~

this is my sourse:

The D-Jetro Power FC units carry the same functions as the regular Power FC units but do not require the use of the factory standard air flow meter and use a mass air pressure sensor. Apart from the unit itself, use of the D-Jetro units requires additional parts that vary depending on the model." - www.greenline.jp The airflow meter (at least in the skyline range) does not pose a big restriction in terms of horsepower and one would doubt the use of the D-Jetro. If you really need massive airflow you can always change to 2 x Q45 Airflow meters and use those with the PowerFC. The skyline series are optimized for closed loop operation with an airflow meter and oxygen sensor for feedback and measuring. Cars the run on a MAP sensor system can suffer drawbacks such as bad idling, poor fuel economy, problems with cold starts etc

from Paul's manual

the costing come from:

http://www.nengun.com/catalogue/brand/1

remeber that you have to add MAP sensor cost to D-jetro

and the "heard term" is literally from a tuner in W.A, you can pm me for his number if you are not satisfied

so...now which bit again?

I've heard that D-jetro pfc is a very crude ECU. lumopy idle, bad fuel consumption. It is used only in high hp applications as afm cannot read tha high air flow even the Q45 ones....It is not recomended for hp which is manageable bt afm.. anywas out of curiosity does D-jetro veersion comes in witht he MAP sensor or have to buy seperately.

I think D-jetro is the cheapest out of all the pfcs

Sky34, I agree with Gav, what you've been told is not true. I know at least 4 De Jetro tuned GTR's in WA which have no problems with idle or fuel consumption. There is a trick to getting the idle right with multiple throttle bodies. I'm sure the tuner you spoke to just doesn't like De Jetro's which is fair enough, but they are a very good product for high hp cars.

Cheers

Paul

hi guys

yeah im sorry the stuff i had in the pfc faq under the djetro area is a bit outdated and the opinion was a bit off with no real evidence. there are a few caveats you need to know about when using djetro pfc, and presumably others

- careful placement of map sensors

- tuning takes a lot more time, much more than afm

- have to buy extra djetro parts and connect it up

To my readings the turbos are not limited by the air flow meters and are spinning at higher revs

to begin with...this is why responce is quicker.thus turbo life is shorter.

Most of the WA guys swear by the better set up using the D Getro vertion of the power-fc.

Correct me if any one actually has heard different. :no:

In simple terms, they offer better performance then if they respond better!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The attached document is fine. I just downloaded & opened it.
    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
×
×
  • Create New...