Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I heard around the place that the M35 will be available for compliance in early 2007. Is this true? Seeing you can get one for less than 1,000,000 yen would make them a damn good car for the price. Anyone got an details on this model such as specs and options?

when they can be made look as good as this who wouldn't want one :mellow:

1.jpg

2.jpg

or the race look :O

1.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/144805-m35-stagea-compliance-in-2007/
Share on other sites

I heard around the place that the M35 will be available for compliance in early 2007. Is this true? Seeing you can get one for less than 1,000,000 yen would make them a damn good car for the price. Anyone got an details on this model such as specs and options?

See my post in buyers guide for specs & options, if it doesn't work properly, go to google tranlation tools and re-translate the whole site.

no turbo either... V6 in everything. from the 4wd's to the 2 seater coupe...

the shape's not bad, but what's underneath doesn't interest me.

Justin...

Huh? they've got a VQ25DET engine - T being turbo :D and whats this about a 2 seater 2 door coupe?

no turbo either... V6 in everything. from the 4wd's to the 2 seater coupe...

the shape's not bad,but what's underneath doesn't interest me.

Justin...

What've you been smoking? Coupe? Stageas are all wagons...

thank you,at least one person knows of more than one model in the lineup.

if there's a 25 turbo version now,that's a step in the right direction. everything else I've sen come out in the last couple of years has been larger capacity NA.

if I wanted a larger NA powered wagon I'd buy a commodore.

Justin...

Meh gotta accept that there are more ways to make power than a 2.5/2.6L straight 6!!!

TT V8s, for example... Gotta get used to the change though... and adapt to NO ROOM in your engine bay lol

Meh gotta accept that there are more ways to make power than a 2.5/2.6L straight 6!!!

TT V8s, for example... Gotta get used to the change though... and adapt to NO ROOM in your engine bay lol

of course there are. I've owned most of them over the years,and I see,drive and work on different stuff everyday as part of my job. doesn't mean I want them however. I'm quite happy with the RB for my tow/daily car. when I want fun I take the S14 out,or work on the 86.

Justin...

I have seen one of the new stageas on ebay. I also thought they were a non turbo ..but this one says it is a turbo.So compliance must be already happening..unless it was brought in as a private import...seems odd that the newer skylines are not turbo but the stagea is...a good reason to get one!...

O.K. here goes...

the 250t RS four V \ 250t RS four V hicas and the 250t RX four are of course all turbo...206kw

the only 3L is the 300RX...191kw

all the rest, 250RX , 250RX four, 250 RS V and the 250 RS , 250 RS four are at 158kw

if i had my printer working i'd scan them....

at the time of writing the advertising booklet the most expensive was the 250t RS four hicas at 3,280,000 yen.

the cheapest was the 250 RS at 2,490,000 yen..add around 300k yen for 4WD.

thats my bit.

ads

Edited by jebud

Theres also a 3.5 litre variant which has 200kw.

They are all heavier than the current stagea but make more power/torque.

I think the VQ25DET makes 405NM from the factory so its definately a true VQ grunter.

My tuner had one on the dyno that was putting out about 160kw in standard form which sounds awesome for a stock vehicle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...