Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so I finally have an RB25DET sitting in the garage waiting patiently to be installed into the ceff... The wrecker I bought it off had reason to believe it had been sitting for maybe a year, some of wich was outside not under cover. It's also unclear to me if the engine was properly sealed i.e inlet and exhaust plugged up.

When he first did the comp test the engine was hard to initially turn over, then showed some irregular results 145-165.

After a few more rotations it showed 165-170.

My questions are these-

Is it likely that there was some form of corrosion build up in the bores from having the engine sit unused for so long? Will this burn off without any harm to compression? should the engine be 'free' enough to turn by hand?

not good if rain was getting inside the engine, but if the compression numbers are up around where they should be, it must have been fairly well protected. how bad is the corrosion on the motor?

Pull the motor down

Only way to tell.

If it's corroded, it's a bad engine, basically, throw it away.

My uncle bought a 1UZFE and couldn't bore it enough to get rid of pitting that the water did to the engine.

I'm not really worried about actual water droplets getting into the engine... More so that it was left to 'breathe' if you will. There is a little bit of that white chalky corrosion on the aluminum parts like the inlet manifold and front cover on the turbo.

What would the reason be for the initial comp test yeilding bad results, and the second one very good results? Crud around the top of the piston and rings?

Am I worrying too much? lol

was the compression test done with the motor hot? compression tests cant be done on a cold motor as the readings are inaccurate. has to do with the expansion of the metal rings, pistons and block. May be why the results varied....

initial ones prob had no oil presure, then slowly as it built it got more *relative* if you will, either way i bought an rb20 in such condition, held just under 200rwkw awsum compresion, unless there was actual water in the bores and left to fill up/sit there with it in, i doubt you will have much troubles.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...