Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Awesome pics Craig. It's surreal seeing so many 34 GTRs together like that! More pics of the N1?

Pics of Terry's N1 were taken with an iPhone and edited on the phone using Snapseed - definitely recommend this app.

i cehcked out the app - it will support android 4.0 ice cream sandwich soon which is what i have!

What the...?

I had to go and look that up, haha. But yeah it's a great little tool, costs a few bucks but worth it IMO

If any of you R34 Owners are after a bit of carbon "look/frp carbon overlay"

-> http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/390222-carbon-goods-for-r32r33r34/page__st__20__gopid__6221104#entry6221104

More buyers, cheaper for us all.

what size rims are on that white r34? they look like polished work meisters - beautiful!

Pretty sure they're 20's x 10.5 but not sure of the offset. I'm sure one of the WA guys knows....

That blue one is mint.

Do you have stand still pics of the white 34 with SLs... and more pics of the white 34 with meisters HOT...(front on if possible)

This is all I got, next time we catch up I'll get some more for you :thumbsup:

cw_10.jpg

cw_11.jpg

Which one is yours Craig?

Matt, I was driving at the time so no photos of mine! I've got a stocky MNP2 V-Spec, but it's nowhere near the pristine condition of the other cars!

Edit: actually first photo on previous page top right - it looks black though.

Edited by 32godzilla

Matt, I was driving at the time so no photos of mine! I've got a stocky MNP2 V-Spec, but it's nowhere near the pristine condition of the other cars!

Edit: actually first photo on previous page top right - it looks black though.

Give yourself and your 34 some credit man! Any other pics of yours?

Very nice Terry - glad to see you enjoying the new car.

Us westerners caught up again today, here's some pics from the day, we had a total of 8 x 34 GTRs including 4 x Nurs, 1 x V-Spec N1 and the rest V-Specs!! I'm hoping to get 12 x 34 GTRs together for the next one :thumbsup:

cw_01.jpg

cw_02.jpg

cw_03.jpg

cw_04.jpg

cw_05.jpg

cw_06.jpg

cw_07.jpg

cw_08.jpg

cw_09.jpg

Fantastic pics, thanks for sharing.

Yeah I did a little research myself and yes it does look very similar but I believe d34throw was a v-spec ii? Also the pics I saw showed red after market seats and gauges everywhere so unless Chris changed it back it's a different car. Huy and I will get the lowdown next time we see him. It certainly is a stunning example.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...