Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

"Everybody else" still seems to be Birnie and myself.

I haven't changed any of the corrections, and it's still running just fine.

In the absence of information from any of the experts regarding what latency or lag time actually is, it seems that it is not a critical figure. The correction for flow rates, is.

hah, yeah that's right Dale ! :)

.....although Ben has joined the club too

Just check my settings as i forgot all about it since being tuned by The Hitman,

He has em setup as 72.0 % and +0.10 Latency?? Go figure.

As far as the 72% goes, i guess his full tune would be applied to that setting so i wouldn't advise using that as a temporary figure to get to the tuners......stick with the 82.5..it's a proven working setting, then let the tuner do whatever they want.

PS...The Hitman RULZ !

Any upadate on the latency for the S15 injectors? Is -0.06 the setting everyone else is still using?

Getting my tune tomorrow.

444cc and 0.5 as i posted only a page ago :)

I used the below and put in +0.06 as calculated. Also used the 82.5%. Tune done at MRC Castle Hill. Got a nice 247.4rwkw (18psi peak trailing back to 16psi).

Tough to test in the wet though. Spins from 4000up.

Good tune at a reasonable price.

Thanks Birnie and Dale.

How do I configure larger injectors?

Configuring larger injectors into the PowerFC is quiet simple and takes only a few moments. You need to know the following information before you can continue

Current injector size

Current injector latency

New injector Size

New injector Lag time

Injector Size and Latency (standard units)

Unit Size Latency

RB26 444cc/min 0.772msec

RB25 370cc/min 0.528msec

SR20 (Jap Spec Manual) 448cc/min 0.584msec

Nismo 480cc 480cc/min 1.100msec

Rx7 550cc 550cc/min 0.730msec

Aftermarket New Units 600cc/min 0.810msec

To work out new INJECTOR correction and latency;

Old SIZE / New Size = Correction

New Latency - Old Latency = Latency Correction

John plans to install 600cc injectors into his RB26 VL Turbo. The following figure's are used;

444 / 600 = 0.74 * 100 = 74.0%

0.81 - 0.77 = +0.04 msec

So he would enter 74% for correction and 0.04 as new latency

Once you have switched to larger injectors you should still check your AFR's with a wideband to ensure they are safe and acceptable.

For a list of common OEM injectors and their settings try here;

Injector Chart - Side Feed OEM

Injector Chart - Top Feed OEM

i forgot to ask. When I plug the Hand controller in again (and when it's dry :P) Ill do a few 2nd gear to redline pulls and check the peak.

He didn't say that they were close to maxing out but I reckon they wouldnt have much left.

Edited by benl1981
i forgot to ask. When I plug the Hand controller in again (and when it's dry :P) Ill do a few 2nd gear to redline pulls and check the peak.

He didn't say that they were close to maxing out but I reckon they wouldnt have much left.

best to check duty in higher gears. 2nd doesnt have enough load.

  • 8 months later...

I thought I'd crunch some numbers about RB25DET injectors and larger direct fit replacements to put y'all in the picture .

Std - 370cc , S15 T manual - 450cc , Nizmo 555 and 740cc .

If you divide the std 370 by 450 555 and 740 you get 0.82 , 0.66 , 0.50 .

So I guess this means the S15 Terracotta coloured ones are ~ 18% larger , 555's are 33% larger , 740's are 50% larger .

I ended up buying new Nismo 555's from a member here which I reckon would be fine for my power requirements using PULP , trouble is if you ever decide to use high ethanol fuel blends such as E85 (if it becomes readily available) you need injectors approx 33% larger than you would with PULP to maintain chemically correct AFR's for E85 .

Where that leaves me is line ball (555's vs 370's and PULP vs E85) so in hindsight if I knew then what I know now I would have bought Nismo 740cc injectors .

Nismoid uses/used 740cc Nismo's I believe in an RB25 and had no issues at idle or light loads - on PULP ?

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...