Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here ya go:

http://www.nitroware.net/~tony/r34gt-t_brochure.doc

2.26Mb English Word document with scanned images. I will keep this up for a limited time - download away.

Interesting for the 34 GT-t owners here.

It starkly highlights just how high spec. 34 models are compared to the 33 GTS-t...

T.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14752-r34-gtt-brochure/#findComment-300820
Share on other sites

hey... that's all Canman's stuff? (fraser simpson) Isn't it??... i thought he took all those pics and scanned all that stuff...

very interesting read tho. nice pics too.

anyone know if that's just a brochure of the Series 2 GT-T cos most the pics are series 2 pics.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14752-r34-gtt-brochure/#findComment-304074
Share on other sites

Originally posted by JimX

Can you spell "marketing"? It seems to have worked its charms on you :mad:

Look at the interior and features - traction control, abs etc. etc. it is higher spec. car than the 33. At a higher price of course.

The interior just looks better designed, appointed, that is all, European almost.

It clearly is pretty much the same car (it is a Skyline after all).

T.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14752-r34-gtt-brochure/#findComment-304938
Share on other sites

Originally posted by T0nyGTSt

Look at the interior and features - traction control, abs etc. etc. it is higher spec. car than the 33. At a higher price of course.

The interior just looks better designed, appointed, that is all, European almost.

It clearly is pretty much the same car (it is a Skyline after all).

T.

Hmm, I had a reply here, where did it go? Anyway... from my struggling memory it was something like this:

I agree that the R34 has a few more standard features. But they would only account for around 25% of the extra "value" associated with the car. And yet a GTT still costs around double a GTS-t made only a couple of months before it. Just because the price sticker is twice as much doesn't make it twice the car, not by a long shot.

Public perception is the main thing that keeps the R34 prices inflated. Well, that and their relative rarity I suppose. Give it a year or two when the R35 becomes vogue (ok most people seem to hate it now, ask them again in a year's time) and I'd expect the price difference between the R33 and 34 to be much more realistic.

Btw, I love my series 1 velour. Wouldn't trade it for the highest spec cloth interior in the world :mad: So on that level I don't even see the R34's interior as "better". As for the rest - aside from the different gauges and such it still looks fundamentally like a Skyline - far fewer differences than between, say, a VS and a VT Commodore.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14752-r34-gtt-brochure/#findComment-305161
Share on other sites

I'm only referring to the photos and specs, but so is Tony. I've seen them up close in person, but never been in one.

Are they *really* twice as good in power, braking, handling, comfort, etc as R33's? If so, why doesn't the appearance reflect this?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14752-r34-gtt-brochure/#findComment-305217
Share on other sites

I just love the cool looking interior - ed's interior is really modern looking. I did not know it was a series one and that's irrelevant, it's just a bit darker looking.

The 34 is a model update like any other - the 33 is much bigger advance over the 32 - the 34 gains the Neo mainly but the appointments are just more modern than the early 90's look 33.

T.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14752-r34-gtt-brochure/#findComment-305259
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...