Jump to content
SAU Community

Dyno Result Im Happy

pimpenr33

By pimpenr33,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

mad082 Grand Master

mad082

Posted
Posted

adding a bigger fuel pump shouldn't affect the AFR's unless the stock pump was dying. the fuel pressure reg makes it so no more fuel enters the system.

having the tune a bit richer up top is good. it cools the exhaust gas temperature, which is good for people running the stock turbo as it prevents the turbo dying so soon. sure you may not have the top end power of someone with a leaner tune up top, but you are running a safer tune, and the turbo will last a touch longer.

pimpenr33 Collaborator

pimpenr33

Posted
  • Author
Posted

well i showed u all the dyno print out say what u will but im happy with what i got and i dont think his dyno would be out. even ray said that he has never had a car on his dyno make that much power with the mods i have so i dunno but i brought the car stock 2 1/2yrs ago from kamikaze motor and iv had the turbo out b4 and it looked pritty dam stock to me anyway i trust rays dyno maybe the people with low dyno reading should head down there and see what power they get. i love reading what arm chair experts have to say there so funny

pimpenr33 Collaborator

pimpenr33

Posted
  • Author
Posted

CEF11E it wasnt 9psi at 6km/ph it was 60km/ph and he wasnt holding it on the dyno or what ever u where saying the reason it dips then goes up is because the knock senser detected a tiny knock so it retards it for a second so im ment to belive the knock was that small that ray couldnt even hear it with some funky special headphone he had on

Cubes Grand Master

Cubes

Posted
Posted

One of these threads again.. :P

Its possible for an R33 with a bit of boost, exhaust and fmic to crack 200rwkw... All though its most definitely not common.

Out of many here in Adelaide I've only ever known of one that was able to do so. Good old Bugalugs here in SA. :)

If its any constellation it was a 1995 Model and had bits and pieces from the s1 and s2. It went on to run a [email protected] with a 2.183 60ft.

CEF11E Veteran

CEF11E

Posted
Posted (edited)
CEF11E it wasnt 9psi at 6km/ph it was 60km/ph and he wasnt holding it on the dyno or what ever u where saying the reason it dips then goes up is because the knock senser detected a tiny knock so it retards it for a second so im ment to belive the knock was that small that ray couldnt even hear it with some funky special headphone he had on

my bad... ment 60.. was typing in the dark

BTW. I am not having a go at you. I am just pointing out my observations :laugh: I am sure you wanted comments otherwise you would not have posted results here

Edited by CEF11E
Nismo_God Veteran

Nismo_God

Posted
Posted

well with those mods it is fairly high but im not too surprised as my very stock 33 with only a turbo back exhaust is making 170rwkw and thats at stock boost spiking to about 8.5-9psi. my estimation is that with with a fmic and boost to 12psi id be close to 200kw. not sure how much a gutted cat helps but it definitely reduces restrictions in airflow. so these figures dont surprise me...

rev210 Grand Master

rev210

Posted
Posted

The shape of the curve looks pretty normal to me for those mods.

Who cares about the peak power value. Wait......a dyno princess would, seems we still have plenty about on these forums these days :laugh: ... My car is so tough on the dyno....drive it?...oh no why would I care about that?

Steve Grand Master

Steve

Posted
Posted

somthing aint normal - 210rwkw on 10psi? thats like 0.7 bar

at the end of the day though, dyno is just there for tuning. I wouldnt worry about a power fc at this stage though, probably not much point if you are making that sort of power, I havent seen much more power out of a stock turbo even with power fc

tuitahi Community Regular

tuitahi

Posted
Posted

I got TBE, Remapped ECU and SMIC, running stock turbo on 8psi.

194rwkw @ DRC Dyno Day (unhappy dyno but I was running a lil lean, 12.5:1, cause of faulty stock pump. Most people thought readings were about 10% low)

196rwkw @ Bel Garage (Bosch 044 and a nice 11.8:1 AFR)

insu Rising Star

insu

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hey mate just quickly, I'm assuming this is a road car yeah?

Not only that but also someone has mentioned what colour your car is? And i'm assuming that is your cars rego in the ID number on the dyno graph (and file name), AND it has your name on the Dyno graph, AND you're telling everyone reading this forum you have a gutted cat?

Hmmmm....

Dude I might be wrong, but for your own sake at least black out your rego details if those three letters and numbers are indeed your rego details.

Edited by insu
Cubes Grand Master

Cubes

Posted
Posted
i run 14psi on the stock turbo. when i go back to 10 it feels so slow.

and yes i know the turbo won't last long.

Depending how you drive.

If your a squirt here squirt there type person it will probably last longer that your willing to put up with it before you throw on a bigger huffer.

If your a crazy mofo that likes to hold third gear down then click fourth as you weave in and out of traffic (as I see some here in Adelaide do) then it won't last long at all. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Borci88
      Borg Warner EFR Series Turbo's V 2.0

      By Borci88 · Posted

      Not a problem at all Lithium, I appreciate your help regardless. I've pulled a small part of a log where the target pressure was 28psi and it spiked to 36.4psi. I've only just begun using Data Log Viewer so if I'm sending this in the wrong format let me know.
    • Lithium
      Borg Warner EFR Series Turbo's V 2.0

      By Lithium · Posted

      Sorry had a bit of a week and haven't had heaps of time to follow this, so apologies if I've missed something - any chance of showing a log with the rpm, turbo speed, MAP, and wgdc all in one view? Definitely an "interesting" problem, and while it's definitely worth noting that there was a similar issue with the twins I'd not completely put all bets on the root cause being the same thing.  Keep an open mind, follow the data.
    • Borci88
      Borg Warner EFR Series Turbo's V 2.0

      By Borci88 · Posted

      I built this engine approximately 12 years ago so my own head (brain) is a little grey on the exact hardware in the RB head, however what I recall is. Stock RB25 NEO TURBO Intake Camshaft HKS 260 degree Exhaust Camshaft (R34 GTR) RB25 NEO Turbo Springs  I ported/removed the exhaust stud humps found in the RB25 head so theres less turbulence but it wasn't ported/polished properly, just a hump removal. I've attached two pictures of the before and after to illustrate.     The ECU gets its boost reference from the nipple on the rear of the head on the intake side, behind the fuel rail. The wastegate gets its boost reference from a nipple on the cooler pipe immediately after the comp cover.  Could a decent pressure drop across the intercooler cause the wastegate to be seeing a higher PSI than what the ECU is seeing, and thus it can't control it accurately and quick enough?   We ran a line to the actuator and watched it open and close using an air compressor, while we didn't have a gauge on the line to see when it was cracking open, it was opening smoothly.  I just removed the gate now and even though the documentation says you need to open it in a vice due to preload (which I did), there wasn't any preload on the cap, which is something we noticed straight out of the box as well when new. This silver cap internally is threaded to the actuator rod that runs out the bottom of the straightgate. Not sure how I'm supposed to get this spring out to be frank.. Potentially but everyone else doesn't appear to have to stop at 500kw because of 6boosts design.  I would, but I think I'm getting to that point where if I'm going to do the head and make another 100kw, then I'm going to need a fancy gearbox and quite a few other things and 10k becomes 20k becomes 30k within a few months. I'm not necessarily sold on the idea just yet that the head is restrictive at 4000rpm (and what.. 300kw?) and yet doesn't seem to be restrictive at 7000rpm when it's making 500kw, however I'm obviously not closing the door on that theory.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      Yeah - Half the problem is I know this sensor actually goes to 150C.. I'm pretty certain it is min of 11C. So still more data required I suppose. It's really quite hard to get the oil temp to 100+ then immediately pull over and take a reading before the temp drops. Annoyingly I suppose the range I really 'want' is likely 80 -> 120C. TBH the ecu can't really *do* anything with it, and the gauge itself is very visible... ...but you know how it is.
    • The Mafia
      Borg Warner EFR Series Turbo's V 2.0

      By The Mafia · Posted

      My EFR 8474 Black, made 800awhp on a roller dyno. at 25-26psi. E85. Shaft speed was around 106,000rpm 1.01 rear. The rear is maxed.  6 boost Turbosmart 60mm gate 3.5inch exhaust  Head is worked to the shithouse. Bain racing. VCam. 272 exhaust. RB28 - RB26 foundation.  You have an intake issue. Start getting proper data and I mean go back to the simple things.  - Pressure test your intake - Block off the Turbo BOV, you don't need it.  - Test pressure before and after your intercooler If your head is pretty stock, that is your issue. Especially if it is NA.  Take it off and spend $10k on it. 
×
×
  • Create New...