Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone got a 90db high flowing exhaust???

Yes i got hks super dragger2 on mine... I got done by epa and i managed to get away with fitting a hi flo cat (i know i know but anyways), a highflow middle muffler and removing the hot dog stlye thats comes standard in the system, my car tested by epa came in at 82.3dbs which is from what they said very good.. The shop i used liverpool exhuast said that the hot dog stlye muffler is only there to increase noise emitted so changing that worked on mine.. But still to the day some coppers dont believe me that it passed epa with the super dragger rear cannon as any1 who has seen them knows they are very large :D look good on the ass off a 33 i think..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2833256
Share on other sites

btw JAs25t i seen u at the creek last night :D i was there my mate racing his s14 he did alright cept for the crack in the exhuast manifold that happen on his 1st run and his clutch aint holding up very well by 3rd but his pb was 12.46 the black one if u seen with unqiue pro series on doors..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2833262
Share on other sites

112db on my old audi, almost straight through, no cannons, twin oval tips...

never had any trouble from the po po :huh: but damn it sounded good!

Ahaha before epa got me 3 1/4 from turbo back just super dragger on ass sounded fat but they dont like hering my baby scream at 4800rmp

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2835138
Share on other sites

I recently switched from a cannon (no name -came with the car) to a Kakimoto Racing. Still flows well but it is much quieter. Has a very throaty sound. My motivation was to get rid of the drone. Never tested the loudness with a db meter.

You know it is JDM when the english translation on it is "Kakimoto Racing Produce"

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2835303
Share on other sites

When a copper pulls you over - show them the paperwork and that will shut him up.

Actually all that will show is that at the time of fitting the exhaust complied, anything could have changed since so they are still well within their right to defect you.

If you want a quiet exhaust get an Australian custom made exhaust rather than an off the shelf Jap exhaust.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2838074
Share on other sites

I got done for "no cover on intercooler" Pod filter, exhaust too loud (He was a bit iffy, he was listening to it, and was like yeah, then he looked and he's like "nah, too big, it'll be too loud"

But he's like "You passed the attitude test, just get it all legal and you'll be sweet, heres the defect notice, but no fines or anything"

I just answered everything honestly.

And I think the only reason he asked me to open the bonnet was because I was missing two wheel nuts. He wasn't interested in anything other then a random breath test until the other officer noticed them missing... :P Ah well, that's all fixed now, just to get exhaust and what not done...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2839956
Share on other sites

I got done for "no cover on intercooler" Pod filter, exhaust too loud (He was a bit iffy, he was listening to it, and was like yeah, then he looked and he's like "nah, too big, it'll be too loud"

But he's like "You passed the attitude test, just get it all legal and you'll be sweet, heres the defect notice, but no fines or anything"

I just answered everything honestly.

And I think the only reason he asked me to open the bonnet was because I was missing two wheel nuts. He wasn't interested in anything other then a random breath test until the other officer noticed them missing... :P Ah well, that's all fixed now, just to get exhaust and what not done...

No cover on the intercooler WTF.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2839961
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...