Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone. I'm looking at buying myself a r32 skyline. I am buying through a import caryard and they currently have two models, essentially exactly the same (1990 r32 coupes) Both are the RB20DE's however one is a turbo. There is only $1.5k between the two, so I could possibly stretch my budget to afford the turbo however...

I am worried about insuring a turbo, the n/a model can only get me 3rd party fire/theft, but the turbo will probably make it uninsurable (for my budget anyway!) Also, due to the age of the cars, I am inclined to think the N/A engine will be in better condition due to less chance of it being thrashed and as turbo's naturally put more strain on the engine. However, I doubt I'd be able to turbo a N/A car for only 1.5k. However this car needs to last a while whislt I pay the loan for it off, and a N/A would definately be more reliable.

Another thing is performance, I like the idea of a turbo, however even as a fully licensed driver I am worried that I will not be able to handle the power (and thats saying something since I've managed to push my 1.8L Pulsar to do some crazy things!) and that I would risk crashing the car or blowing the engine or something similar (All you L and P platers out there wanting a turbo, believe me, DON'T, I could give you a long list of people I know who have had bad accidents because they got a car too powerful for them to handle, stick with a low power car for the first few years, you'll be a better driver for it)

Anyway, getting back to it. Even a N/A 2 litre 6 cyl should be a marked increase on my current car so it should be enough to satisfy my need for power. Although I must admit the idea of the turbo appeals to me mostly coz I would then be able to drag off my brothers WRX, which the N/A would not be able to do :laugh:.

So for all those guys with experience in both, would I be best to stick with N/A and upgrade later and for now have a potentially more reliable engine or will the turbo version be likely to last as long and be worth the extra 1.5k? And will a N/A still have enough kick to satisfy me without being TOO powerful, or are the turbo's fairly easy to control?

Thanks for letting me get that all out, sorry if any of this has been covered in past threads but I really need to get all this info all together in one place to make my final choice. Anywayz, Merry christmas to all, happy new year! Hope to get a good response soon and with any luck will be joining you all in owning a skyline (assuming my loan gets approved of course :))

Incidently, the prices of the cars are $8900 and $10500 respectively, neither are registered (So an RACT check is in the pipelines, and yes, the T is for TASMANIA) Anywayz, thanks again

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148507-buying-r32-choice-of-turbo-or-na/
Share on other sites

turbo pro's - the power. which doesnt really come on till youve got a few revs on board. better brakes.

cons - more things to go wrong. they are pretty slow, so if you do get yourself into trouble, then you don't have the maturity/car control to be driving anything decent. A BA falcon has more power than a turbo 32.

non turbo pros - easy to drive, balanced, insurance, less things to go wrong.

cons - resale, small brakes (won't be an issue unless you are doing trackdays or if you are a hard braker and doing mountain runs.

who cares about dragging your brothers WRX off from the lights. its not a dîck measuring competition. enjoy driving, and use driving courses/trackdays/skidpan days to be the best/safest driver possible.

Posting this in the NA forums will get you a NA weighted response.

I drove a 1.8L NA on my last car then swaped the engine out for a 1.8L turbo. Same engine, but factory turbo. The difference is staggering. You have a much more responsive throttle in the turbo, more pickup and just a better feel.

a 32 GTST is not a terribly quick car. But you will kick yourself if you get a 32 NA, it will be about the same speed or less as your pulsar due to added weight and added drivetrain loss, albeit with more traction. It wont handle as well as the pulsar did in stock form either.

The turbo has lag yes. But not much. At the end of the day the turbo version is the most common and most popular version because its got good power to weight. The NA version is very mild, im thinking of getting one for my daily driver because its a nice slow car with low fule consumption however it still looks the goods (for the record, I drive a 32 GTR, which is a 2.6L Twin Turbo AWD skyline)

RB20DE very slow, if you want reasonable performance just buy the turbo and drive it stock. It's your decision whether or not to up the boost. engine could very well be bad, but there are so many of them you will definately find any parts that need fixing.

Insurance, is very similar.

imo you'll do better with the turbo. The power difference between the RB20DE and RB25DE is quite noticable.

  • 4 weeks later...

well i own both.. iv got a 32 gts manuel anda 32 gts t auto..believe it or not my gts will beat my gts t through the hills etc.. well as long as i keep the revs above and 7 grand where the power comes in.Iv weighed both the cars and the gts is 90kg lighter than the auto gts t so thats probably why i can getit goen quicker through corners and crap..

Line the 2 cars up at the lights and the gts will normally have the gts t by about half a car through 1st.. then, dead even right through 2nd.. just after changing into 3rd in the gts (about 100km/h) the gts t will pull away a decent amount.

As for the fuel economy, the difference between the 2 is nothing in my opinion..actually if anything the gts t (which is driven by my wife) gets about 30-40kms more per tank nowadays than my gts.

I can tell you that after driving both cars that the gts t feels a hell ov lot more powerfull. The problem with the gts is there really isnt much power below about 4500rpm, if you want to make it go well you gotta take the revs up. The gts t just powers away easily with plenty of torque pull from about 2700-2800rpm. Oh and the gts has bugger all torque and doesnt like hills much either, once again unless you drive it above 5000rpm. The gts t just powers up big hills extremely easily.

I would say if you can afford the turbo car then go for that one. Gts's can get a bit annoying to drive around sometimes due to their lack ov torque, believe me you get sick ov revving it out all the time.

And also if it helps you at all, a gts will easily beat your pulsar ina drag. I know people with them and yeah, they get eaten by me.lol. Ina straight line you will be around 2-3 car lenghts ahead ov VN commies etc, which is always a good... ahahaha..

all the best with making your decision.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So stock ECU does not like anything above 10 psi?  That Nistune one is just for "try" if it will be any different, I know it need to be tune for that. I know but YOU may know about these problem but i/we dont. They few little Skylines here let alone people who know anything about tham so that is why iam asking here  
    • So now we have a radiator with no attachments whatsoever. It lifts up with a particularly tight spot between the drivers side air box mount and the lower radiator outlet, but if you've got this far you will sort that too. This is the lower mounts with the rad out so you can see where the rubber bushes go, it is a straight shot upwards Done! Assembly is the reverse of disassembly, with blood less likely to be shed.
    • Right, onto the second last trick. The Air Con condenser is mounted to the front of the radiator and stays in the car when the radiator is removed. There are 2x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the condenser to the radiator, remove those The bottom of the condenser is attached to the radiator with clips. You need to lift the condenser out of those clips and clear (up, then forward). f**ked if  could work out how to do that last bit with the front bumper on. I hope you can, and you share the trick.  Bumper removal probably deserves its own thread one day once I've recovered the will to live, but basically you need to remove the wheels, front inner guard liners (clips and 10mm headed bolts), the self tapper between the guard and the bumper at the rearmost point of the bumper (same as an R32 that bit), any remaining clips at the top/front of the grill, an absolute bastard design with a plate that holds the top of the bumper above the headlight each side (only 1 bolt which is tricky to get to, but the plate catches 2 places on the bumper and must be removed....carefully!) and push clips between the bumper and guard under the headlight. If you've done all that you will be faced with wiring for the fog lights on both sides and in ADM Q50 RS at least, 4 nasty tight plugs on the driver's side for the ADAS stuff. So, the clips at the bottom look like this on drivers side (looking from the front) And on the passenger side (also from the front), you can see this one is already out Clearance on both of these are super tight; the condenser needs to move up but the upper rad support mount prevents that, and the radiator can't move down far because it is (rubber) mounted. Once you achieve the impossible and drop the condenser off those mounts so it does not stop the rad moving, you are good to go
    • OK, next the shroud needs to come off and there are a couple of tricks. Firstly, there is a loom from near the passenger side headlight to the fans, coolant temp sensor etc and there is no plug to undo.  In my case I was OK to leave the shroud on top of the engine so I just undid the passenger side fan plug and about 10 of the clips which gave enough free wire to put it aside. The fan plugs were super tight, the trick I used was a small falt screwdriver to push down on the release tab, then a larger flat screwdriver to lever the plug out of the fan unit....be careful with how much force you apply! If you need to remove the shroud altogether for some reason you will have to deal with all the plugs (tight) and clips (brittle)....good luck. I removed all of the clips and replaced them with cable ties that I will just cut next time. Also, in the Red Sport / 400R at least, the intake heat exchanger reservoir hose is bolted to the shroud in 2 places with 10mm headed bolts; so remove them (the hose stays in the car; no need to undo it at the t fittings down at the radiator lower mount. Once you've dealt with the HX hose and the wiring loom, there are 3x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the shroud to the radiator; remove those.   The shroud then lifts out of the bottom mounts where it sits on the radiator, up and onto the engine out of the way. Simples
    • Ok, disregard my “rate them” comment, sorry for my unrealistic input
×
×
  • Create New...