Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Not necessarily doubting you Mark but auto diffs are usually longer. In the R34 the auto is 4.089 and the manual is 4.111. I know that's close enough to be almost the same but you see whatI mean?

I thought the R33 auto diffs were 3.9xx but I've got nothing to back myself up there. :cheers:

From what I understand the auto R33 diff is a 4.3 and the r33 manual diff a 4.1.

The R32 Turbo's run the same diff ratio for both the auto and manual being a 4.3.

Abobob, The reason for the r34 ratio being different may be due to the gearbox ratio's. The R32/R33 auto's run quite a long first gear. If they were to run a 4.11 ratio behind the auto they would be looking at almost 70km/h out of first.

Not necessarily doubting you Mark but auto diffs are usually longer. In the R34 the auto is 4.089 and the manual is 4.111. I know that's close enough to be almost the same but you see whatI mean?

I thought the R33 auto diffs were 3.9xx but I've got nothing to back myself up there. :happy:

In older cars when you had top gears with 1 to 1 in both manual and autos, autos always had lower ratio diffs ( lower number but actualy higher diff, longer legs). The reason for that, the torque converter in the auto slips so it makes easier to take off and because it slips lower high speed .

Most late model cars don't use a straight gear anymore and most autos have a very high top gear ( around .7-.8 to one, even lower) . Thats the reason you don't need a higher diff in autos now so it wouldn't surprise me if the auto was the same as a manual. These days most cars have a lock up converter in top gear ( even top 2 some of them with 5 or more ratios) .I have no idea what the skyline ratios are though.

Edited by wrxhoon

On that note I have a rear diff ratio of 4.375 thats in good nick if any one wants it? >_<

I bought a GTR diff that already had the swap done to it. Its in excellent condition but I'm keeping the centre and half shafts. I'm selling just the diff gears (pinion and crown) or the pumpkin if the individual wishes not to stuff around refitting the pinion to their pumpkin.

I was hoping for a set of 4.11's to go behind the rb30. Bugger. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...