Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a stock inlet manifold with a pod on my R33 GTST and get that pssshht noise on gear changes/off throttle that I thought was an atmo BOV. Is the noise much more noticeable with the pod vs a stock airbox?

I had a poke around under the bonnet and it all plumbs back into just behind the pod.

It also connects into the boost controller - does this mean that the factory BOV is also the wastegate?

cheers mike

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149338-factory-bov-with-pod/
Share on other sites

the bov has nothing to do with the wastegate.

the wastegate does not make any noise.

the factory bov is plumback and you will hear it revent on gearchange if you have a pod filter filter, as you can hear it echo in the intake pipes

With a stock air box and the complete resonator box with extra sections you shouldnt hear the recirculation/bov noise at all. I didnt on my gtr anyway. If you just have the air box and no resonator box you get a very brief 'dou'..'dou' IE: the begining of a compressor surge noise..

sorry to highjack. I am new to turbocharged vehicles. my fresh imported R33 S2 has what i have been told the stock plumback bov but also has a blitz atmospheric job on one of the intercooler pipes. u can only see it if u take the scoop of the stock airbox off. whats the advantages/disadvantages of this set up? how can i tell if my stock plumb back works? ill try and get a photo

sorry to highjack. I am new to turbocharged vehicles. my fresh imported R33 S2 has what i have been told the stock plumback bov but also has a blitz atmospheric job on one of the intercooler pipes. u can only see it if u take the scoop of the stock airbox off. whats the advantages/disadvantages of this set up? how can i tell if my stock plumb back works? ill try and get a photo

How loud is the "ppssst'' noise? if you have the stock air box you wouldn't hear anything using the stock bov, I'd say that only one of them is in use, So I Don't think you would have any advantage to having them both there!

Edited by RPR33
How loud is the "ppssst'' noise? if you have the stock air box you wouldn't hear anything using the stock bov, I'd say that only one of them is in use, So I Don't think you would have any advantage to having them both there!

its not very loud

I bought my car stock and there was no psssstt noise just the turbo winding up, then i got a front mount intercooler and a turbosmart vee port blow off valve and its not plumb back and i had the blow off valve noise, it also makes a fluttering noise depending on how i use the throttle. Then i put the pod filter on and there is a huge difference on the induction noise and with the bonnet up, i reved it a little and u can hear like a wastegate fluttering noise coming from the pod filter... that may be the noise your hearing, coming from the pod?

Then i put the pod filter on and there is a huge difference on the induction noise and with the bonnet up, i reved it a little and u can hear like a wastegate fluttering noise coming from the pod filter... that may be the noise your hearing, coming from the pod?

take my word for it, it wasn't the wastegate that the fluttering noise was coming from.

take my word for it, it wasn't the wastegate that the fluttering noise was coming from.

QUOTE(series2r33 @ 2 Jan 2007, 06:28 PM)

Then i put the pod filter on and there is a huge difference on the induction noise and with the bonnet up, i reved it a little and [/u] that may be the noise your hearing, coming from the pod?

I never said it was?!

take my word for it, it wasn't the wastegate that the fluttering noise was coming from.

Spot on.

Please search function, as im closing this one before it gets too much more incorrect information in it.

This topic comes up regularly... and as usual there are people that are not sure what they are talking about and posting mis-information like.. "its the wastegate flutter", the "BOV is the wastegate" etc etc.

If you are not sure about something, dont mis-lead others.

Thanks.

QUOTE(series2r33 @ 2 Jan 2007, 06:28 PM)

Then i put the pod filter on and there is a huge difference on the induction noise and with the bonnet up, i reved it a little and [/u] that may be the noise your hearing, coming from the pod?

I never said it was?!

There is no such thing as wastegate flutter, or anything thats "like" wastegate flutter... as simply put

A wastegate

a) does not flutter

b) make flutter

c) have anything to do with flutter in any sense of the word.

drag-on silvia is correct.

www.howstuffworks.com

If you are unsure, go have a read and understand how a turbo system works.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...