Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

wait till i test it, if you come for a drive down from qld i will enable it for you for free :)

everyone else has to pay $50 :thumbsup:

that is wicked!

If you get it working I would be happy to work out some deal with you so that i can have it enabled on mine! :P

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 10 months later...

After reading all of that Im still confused, Using a normal Bee-r limiter, like the ones sold on SAU right now, is it likely to damage your turbo if u hit the limiter often? or say a couple of times each time you go for a drive,

So whats the cheapest option for a 0km/h (stationary) rev limiter? Have always thought about one of these, i don't really care about the ignition cut as i don't want to destroy the cat so i don't wanna spend $300 on a BeeR.

I'm guessing you can't do something with the LT12S to do it?

Yeah see i'd rather not do that (even though it would be fun shooting huge flames and launching on boost).

Would rather just a normal rev limiter (fuel cut) on stand still so i can dial in the exact rpm to launch from. Similar to what the new FG falcon's have, hold in the clutch and flloor it and it limits revs to like 4000rpm or whatever.

So whats the cheapest option for a 0km/h (stationary) rev limiter? Have always thought about one of these, i don't really care about the ignition cut as i don't want to destroy the cat so i don't wanna spend $300 on a BeeR.

I'm guessing you can't do something with the LT12S to do it?

The microtech probably has the option in there. Have a squiz at the manual for it /software.

Hmm ok i had a look in the manual and there is an Aux Input function that sets a rev limiter when the (12V) Aux input is activated.

Explains it furthur saying "You can hook up a 12V switch to the AUX input and set a limit figure in the InpRPMlim screen and use the InpTiming screen to retard timing slightly. When the button is presed, the engine will be limited to this rpm figure, and the timing retarded. Releasing the button will deactivate the rev limiter and return the timing to its normal value, allowing the engine to instantly produce full power. This way you can very easily use the Aux Input to set up a basic two-step."

So in other words, you could somehow hook it up to the handbrake and have the rev limiter set until you release the handbrake?

Might look into this furthur and play around with it a bit.

Edited by PM-R33
  • 5 months later...
  • 3 months later...

digging up an old thread but i was researching gizmo products and came across this thread.

Note that's the new Launch interface allows timing retard settings and support for other engines

http://tunertools.com/proddetail.asp?prod=GZM-G0919

being used on a Silvia, sounds like rb25

small demo on the shift light that integrates with the launch control

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...