Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I can sell them for $99 inc postage

Them's fighting words, I'll take a pair of 4300K kits at that price thanks!

Else I think you should pull your head in. Even I know fitting these HID kits is not legal, because of the reasons bankids has mentioned. Would it stop me if I was otherwise convinced the result would be an improvement? No, of course not. The only proviso is that oncoming drivers aren't being blinded by the mod.

That is the main thing holding me back from buying an HID kit. I'd love to see some pictures of the beam cutoff pattern on R33 S2 headlights, if anyone has some spare time.

Them's fighting words, I'll take a pair of 4300K kits at that price thanks!

Else I think you should pull your head in. Even I know fitting these HID kits is not legal, because of the reasons bankids has mentioned. Would it stop me if I was otherwise convinced the result would be an improvement? No, of course not. The only proviso is that oncoming drivers aren't being blinded by the mod.

That is the main thing holding me back from buying an HID kit. I'd love to see some pictures of the beam cutoff pattern on R33 S2 headlights, if anyone has some spare time.

Dosent H1, H3, H4, refer to set standards? Surely its not just descriptive of the base configuration.

For example, H4 being the Hi/Low type, shouldnt there be a set distance from the base putting it at the correct focal position? Otherwise different brands would give non-consistant beam patterns.

Jordan

sorry mate ann colour under 6500k is legal that's mean any over 6500k is illegal and warranty is in australia just send me back and I will test it then send back the replacement no need to send over due to I should have enough replacement not like others supplier they all wasting time!!

Um no, any kit without DOT37 approval is illegal.

Dosent H1, H3, H4, refer to set standards? Surely its not just descriptive of the base configuration.

For example, H4 being the Hi/Low type, shouldnt there be a set distance from the base putting it at the correct focal position? Otherwise different brands would give non-consistant beam patterns.

Jordan

You are right, H1, H3 and H4 (infact all of them) are different. They should have different bulb base and also different focal points. If you have a generic focal size (generic bulb0 and just vary the bulb base, the focal point will not be the same as the halogen equivalent and will result in poor light output because the housing is designed to accept a certain focal point.

  • 4 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...