Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

just a bit of advice. I sent my R33 in for a wheel alignment, balance and rotation the other day at Fulcrum in Brisbane on the southside. The wheel balance and alignment was done, but they did not rotate the wheels. I rang and asked why they did not do them, and the reply was "the technician decided it was better for the best wheels to be at the front. This is standard policy". This is not what I asked for. I specifically asked twice for the wheels to be rotated. I paid for a wheel rotation and balance - it should have been done. At the least they should have called me about this instead of making a presumption. Fulcrum were good enough to offer me a free wheel alignment next time I go there (if I go there again) when I complained about this. So just make sure if you are dealing with these people to check they have done what you have asked and paid for.

A question: Why should the better wheels (with more tread left on them) be at the front of the car? For better grip during cornering? Because the skyline is rear wheel drive, I thought It would be better to have more grip at the rear to keep traction, and better power delivery (and cause it wears the tyres out more quickly at the rear).

Thanks,

Eek

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15105-make-sure-you-get-what-you-paid-for/
Share on other sites

this is why i never leave my car anywhere unattended while work is gettin done, just hang out of old mates pocket and question everything they dotouch, *** em.....if im pain good money, oh and i never let anyone drive her without me, except the girl, she drives it every day....i musta got the short straw there....

lenno

This is full of bull.  

Fact one - best tyres should be at the back ALWAYS. Promotes understeer not oversteer.  

Fact two - different sized f/r wheels should NOT be rotated.  

T.

i thought this as well. however the car steers with the front id prefer to have more tread on the front. Ive been told from a usually relaible source that more tread on the fron is better.

rb26dett, my thoughts exactly

In my opinion,provided the tires are the same size, the best tires should be at the front.

1.Most of the weight of the car is on the front axle-more load on the front tires.

2.Consider where your priority lies- good take-offs with better tires at the back or being able to pull-up in time instead of aquaplanning on the bald tires in rainy weather.

I think Fulcrum tech did the right thing by leaving the good tires at the front.Of course they should have let you know,of course they should't have charged you for wheel rotation but thats another story.

Dave hits it right there.

Most people can react to understeer without any knowledge - LIGHT braking and ease off the power.

However many people can react to oversteer?

Steer opposite to what you instinctively KNOW and keep the power down? This amplified by FWD cars that have savage lift-off oversteer properties.

This is for people who have no training other than what they learn from their mums and dads...

The 'new tyres on the back' is the advice given to people who have say 50% tyres but can only afford two new tyres.

T.

Good tyres to the front always. Much prefer to have steering/brake control than not have the brain power to control my right foot. Even the effectiveness of ABS is severly diminished if you are aquaplaining. And currently owning a reasonably quick RWD car, and a reasonably quick FWD car, there is definately a requirement to have good tyres, especially at the front. Its is even more pronounced in a FWD car. Besides, why argue with Fulcrum. I would never take my car there as I think all of their gear, especially labour, is overpriced, but they do know their stuff. They still should have consulted with you though.

Whoa, heaps of replies! I didn't know what was best for the tyres - to be on front or rear, that's why I asked. My wheels are all the same size, and the tyres currently on the front have slightly less grip than the back - not talking brand new on the back and worn at the front.

Well I took the car for a wheel alignment and balance cuase i had bad vibration over 120km/hr. Guess what? It's still there. It's violent between 120-130km/h. I've noticed that at 120km/h it vibrates through the steering wheel. 130km/h, the vibration in the steering wheel is less, but the console (where the radio a/c is) shakes like hell. At 140km/h, the vibration moves to the drive shaft/rear i think. Any ideas on what this could be?

Cheers,

Eek

same problem! on the freeway all is well, but accelerate to just over 120 and the steering wheel shakes. seems to go away above about 140. sent it in for wheel balance (it was aligned 2 months ago with no difference) and absolutely NO change. it's not that bad, just noticeable, and annoying in what is otherwise a smooooth car to drive.

grrrr.....

Eek Skywalker - Notice you are from Brisvegas. I have to recommend the guys from Bob-Jane Toombul. They are the first guys to give me a decent alignment/wheel balance in years. I got the full treatment last time when I got my new tyres and it feels great. The best thing for me was, the wheel allignment. As I have fully adjustable suspension they set it to the settings I asked for, amazing! It could be your rotors though or also, I have had problems with certain brands of tyres being seemingly impossible to balance. Try another balance first though, its the cheapest.

The wheels with the best tread should always be at the front. Its industry practice and a safety thing more than anything. Steering and braking are done on the front wheels so thats where you want your grip to be. Most people dont have to worry about oversteer because the dont drive hard enough to force the car to oversteer.

Obviously if they are different sizes front/rear you leave them.

All cars are actually engineered to understeer a little bit. This promotes the best chance of a head-on collision where the crumple zones will be most effective. A car that has tendency to oversteer will be very dangerous in event of a crash as side intrusion bar will not be as good a shock absorbant as your whole front engine bay/boot crumple zones.

How many times you've seen a car wraped in a pole and injured the occupant badly? Compare it to frontal hit where ppl inside would probably has minor injury or bruises from seatbelts only.

Of course if you had a frontal hit at 200km/h you hardly stand a chance anyway, so drive carefully and it'll never happens. <>

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...