Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Getting close to putting my car on the road and I need to move the spring landing on my coilovers to give me a little more clearance on the rim. This will obviously change the spring pre-load, but I'm not sure what that means. Anyone care to explain to me what the affects of more or less pre-load will mean.

Cheers

Brendan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151688-spring-pre-load/
Share on other sites

Your car will be raised up by moving the lower spring seat.

Preload is how much the load is applied to the spring before you put the weight of the car onto it. You need an incredible amount of preload to start effecting the linearness of the spring once the weight of the car is on the spring, so I wouldn't worry about it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151688-spring-pre-load/#findComment-2822096
Share on other sites

Getting close to putting my car on the road and I need to move the spring landing on my coilovers to give me a little more clearance on the rim. This will obviously change the spring pre-load, but I'm not sure what that means. Anyone care to explain to me what the affects of more or less pre-load will mean.

Cheers

Brendan

Pre load is used to adjust static weight distribution. With linear rate springs, force is proportional to displacement, ie F = kx. The more displacement of the spring the higher the spring force, so if you increase the preload (ie wind the spring seat up) you will increase the force on that corner of the car and therefore shift the weight onto the other corners accordingly.

The only way to properly set the car up is with a flat patch and scales on all 4 corners of the car, you can approximate by adjusting the spring seats to the same length but this will never be right because the car wont have exact 50/50 weight distribution front/rear and left/right and also the spring rates will never match exactly.

Increasing preload will also change the ride height though, that is why good coil overs have separate height and preload adjustment, but usually this is a waste of time on road cars.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151688-spring-pre-load/#findComment-2829940
Share on other sites

It's true that adding preload will add a force upwards, but dont forget, once the weight of the car is on the spring, all of this force is negated, and you end up all preload gone and the only thing compressing the spring is the car now.

Preload adjustment is mainly for height adjustment. As far as I'm aware, preload has no real function as it is all taken up by the weight of the car. You will also notice that in some rear struts, helper springs are used which means you have pretty much no preload at all as the helper spring compresses before the main spring due to its much softer rate.

Edited by salad
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151688-spring-pre-load/#findComment-2830094
Share on other sites

Hmmm, I'm listening, but now you're both confusing me. I do intend to set the car up properly with the corner weighting, but the reason for moving the spring seat is clearance. Not sure if 10mm of difference in the pre-load would affect the handling as such, but more the corner weighting...is that basically what you're both trying to say?

Cheers

Brendan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151688-spring-pre-load/#findComment-2830125
Share on other sites

[it's true that adding preload will add a force upwards, but dont forget, once the weight of the car is on the spring, all of this force is negated, and you end up all preload gone and the only thing compressing the spring is the car now.

As far as I'm aware, preload has no real function as it is all taken up by the weight of the car

if you have no preload then with the weight of the car the suspension will be compressed more. Just balancing of forces - if no preload then the resultant force compressing the spring is higher therefore more compression of spring and lower ride height.

Hmmm, I'm listening, but now you're both confusing me. I do intend to set the car up properly with the corner weighting, but the reason for moving the spring seat is clearance. Not sure if 10mm of difference in the pre-load would affect the handling as such, but more the corner weighting...is that basically what you're both trying to say?

thats about right - your handling would only be affected if you have different corner weights and by the increase in COG (increasing your ride height). The preload won't affect how "stiff" your ride is either.

If you coilovers only have single adjustment for spring seat heigh (that is you cant adjust height and preload separately)

1. Set car up to ride height by setting spring seats

2. If you have scales adjust your corner weights by tuning the preload. If not you can just go with getting the height roughly the same, you won't be able to tell the difference much on the road anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151688-spring-pre-load/#findComment-2836625
Share on other sites

I have a set of RG JTC'N1 V Stage coilovers with both spring seat and mount height adjustability.

http://www.sillbeer.com/2005/12/rg-goodness-arrives_14.html

They should be fine then for my needs.

Thanks for the help fella's.

Cheers

Brendan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151688-spring-pre-load/#findComment-2836645
Share on other sites

if you have no preload then with the weight of the car the suspension will be compressed more. Just balancing of forces - if no preload then the resultant force compressing the spring is higher therefore more compression of spring and lower ride height.

The spring does compress more without preload, but dont forget that to increase preload, you have to raise the spring seat up. In doing this it raises the car. In single way height adjustable shocks (without helper springs), you add more preload to raise the car up. If they have helper springs, there is bugger all preload force, helper srings are very soft.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151688-spring-pre-load/#findComment-2836823
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...