Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This car just isn't practical for me anymore. It barely gets driven as my work is less than 1 km away from home, and I have commitments which require me to have a bigger car. So as much as I love this car i have to make room for something else.

Item: 1993 R32 Gts-t

Location: Sydney - North shore

Reason for selling car: New car

Price: $14,000 firm

Kms: 123,000

Contact - PM me or 0434361959 (after 4pm)

Condition: The car is in immaculate condition. It is always undercover and paint has been meticulously looked after. You won't find a better condition r32. The car has been serviced every 5000kms with all work done by Proconcept.

Engine Mods:

R34 GTT turbo

Trust VSPL FMIC

Apexi AVC-R Boost Controller

GFB Mach 1 blow off valve

Full exhaust

Walbro fuel pump - 500hp

Ecu remap to suit the turbo and pump

Aftermarket POD filter

Autometer Boost Gauge

Car has made 189kw on 13.5psi with dyno papers

Wheels:

18" Wheels

DBA brake upgrade on the front w/slotted rotors

Project Mu brake pads

Suspension:

Cusco front and rear strut braces

Full whiteline suspension kit - sway bars, bushes, shocks and springs

Bilstein shocks

Interior:

3 point immobiliser

Cd player

Rockford Fosgate amp

Splits/6x9's

Exterior

Full Vertex bodykit

Have just had it serviced with new oil, oil filter, fuel filter, new Pod, new coolant and new spark plugs. Runs superbly

Note: There is some slight damage to the paint on the boot from removing the wing. Haven't had time to get it painted. Have been quoted $300 to fill the holes and spray. Can get this organised for the buyer

Only Genuine enquiries please

pattorearWP.jpg

PattoWP.jpg

patty.jpg

monavale.jpg

1.jpg

Edited by patto1234
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152940-1993-r32-gts-t-modified-immaculate/
Share on other sites

any interior/engine bay shots?

The 6x9s, are they in the rear? If so is the parcel shelf cut to fit them?

Also has it had a major service done at any point? ie. Timing belts etc

I can get some interior shots and stuff if you would like.

Not sure about the 6x9's, they were there when I got the car so I can't say for sure. And yeah its had the major service done. And as mentioned I just had a number of other things serviced the other day so its running very nicely

Being interstate, the more photos the better :sick: as its a bit hard to just pop over for a look.

you could email em to [email protected] if you want.

Cheers.

Sale temporarily postponed due to unfortunate family situation. Will "reopen" the thread when I am in a better position to be selling the car but right now I have my priorities. Apologies to all those who were interested.

Sale temporarily postponed due to unfortunate family situation. Will "reopen" the thread when I am in a better position to be selling the car but right now I have my priorities. Apologies to all those who were interested.

Hope everything works out Patto... when your ready let me know, no matter how long it takes...

Hope everything works out Patto... when your ready let me know, no matter how long it takes...

Thanks mate I appreciate that. I will let you know the second it's back on the market.

  • 1 month later...
Bump

hey mate is the car still available as i tried looking for it on carsales but couldn't find it, if it is i am more than interested in the car and would you be able to send me some interior and engine bay shots? ([email protected])

thanks Nathan

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...