Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

back to topic..

according to the title, I will say TD06-2og will be easy to drive around, and comes with some very good power, and if you can invest some $$ on cam gears / cams then it will be perfect..and this is back up by riding experience of Buster's car. thanks.

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I will ask buster to answer this questionin in detail..

But I will say what I saw..

Td06-20g 10cm sqr, trust manifold, front pipe,3 " exhaust system, external wastegate, Trust cooler, EVC, chipped R33 ECU..

from what can see at passenger side..spool around 3100...hard at 4000 (up) till red line...lag was there, but not what I expect..power come smoothly..

He sold the car....and the car now is in autostyle sydney..but both of us will have something similar come up soon..will keep you post.

mmm... on the other turbo's thing...

(don't shoot me i'm no expert)

I think i still have the stock t04E that came on GTS-R's.

Now my car has an RB25 though and it hits full bosst around 4300 and makes boost from around 3500 or something near that.

It produces 190rwkw @6600 on 9.5psi

at 4500 it has 120rwkw and 5500 it has around 160rwkw.

To drive it's nice, and between gears i don't drop 1,500 rpm (maybe i have modded box, no idea though), so i can stay on full boost in every gear.

I know that a t04 is like super old technology and stuff but you can mix/match the exhaust and front housings/wheels i think ??

And from what i've heard they aren't all that expensive. Like approx $1500-$2000 ?

just a thought that's open to discussion as i wouldn't mind learning some stuff :D

Usually on the compressor or front housing, and the exhaust or turbine housing.

Turbine housing is pretty important to determining when a turbo will come on boost, the smaller the housing, the sooner the boost comes on - the trade off being you wont have as much top end. The sort of power you are making is easily acheivable with a stock turbo, but they tend to come on boost just over 2K with a good exhaust setup.

If I had to guess, I would say that your exhaust AR ratio is a little on the large side.

EDIT: also the T04E isnt a small turbo for a 2.5

NFI!

i've got this extractor cover/shield thing. I'll get it off in the next day or two and have a look.

I do know though that the mouth (where it sucks air in) is reasonably big.

mmm, i've seen cars achieve what i am with the stock turbo, but they are all running more than 9psi of boost ?!?

Yes, true, but think about this: my car runs 12.5psi has a stock turbo and makes boost from 2000rpm full boost by 2500 and 203 rwkw peak,

You have 120rwkw at 4500,

I make 120rwkw at about 3300rpm, by 4500 I am making 165

rwkw. By the time your engine is making 160kw, mine has made 190.

It takes you nearly 1000 rpm to make your 9.5psi, I can get 12psi in about half that and it starts 1500 rpm earlier.

Which setup, if both were fitted to the same car do you think would make a quicker car?

Now, if you could make 12.5psi by 3000rpm...

Originally posted by sidewaymambo

I will ask buster to answer this questionin in detail..

But I will say what I saw..

Td06-20g 10cm sqr, trust manifold, front pipe,3 " exhaust system, external wastegate, Trust cooler, EVC, chipped R33 ECU..

from what can see at passenger side..spool around 3100...hard at 4000 (up) till red line...lag was there, but not what I expect..power come smoothly..  

He sold the car....and the car now is in autostyle sydney..but both of us will have something similar come up soon..will keep you post.

yep Phil you hit the nail on the head all I can see you missed is the 550 inj, Bosch fuel pump and Z32 afm

It did start to spool in the low 3000rpm's and had full 1.1 bar by 4000rpm the boost did come on pretty harshly hahaha all in all I think the set up is great when you look at the cost of one of these turbo's and how cheap they are to have rebuilt

Hi Guys, I posted this before....

Graph peaks at around 308 rwkw at 196 kph which would be 7,250 rpm allowing for 27 kph per thousand RPM. That means at 108 kph (around 4,000 rpm) it has 93 rwkw

So if you changed gear at 7,000 rpm in first the engine would have 300 rwkw and would drop to 4,000 rpm in second where it had 93 rwkw. It would then struggle to accelerate the car until it got to around 5,000 rpm when the power jumps to 180 rwkw. This would indicate not very much boost under 5,000 rpm.

Simple table follows; as shown on the TD06 dyno graph on page 1

At 7,000 rpm it has 300 rwkw

At 6,000 rpm it has 250 rwkw

At 5,000 rpm it has 195 rwkw

At 4,000 rpm it has 93 rwkw

That's an average of 210 rwkw.

This would make, firstly a fairly slow accelerating car through the gears as it has a relatively low average amount of power (210 rwkw) compared to its maximum. Secondly this would make it very difficult to drive as it would be constantly moving from over 300 rwkw to under 200 rwkw with only a 1,500 rpm drop in revs.

I would say that the turbo is too big and the car would be faster with a smaller turbo, say one with a 260 rwkw maximum. Power table like this;

At 7,000 rpm it has 260 rwkw

At 6,000 rpm it has 240 rwkw

At 5,000 rpm it has 200 rwkw

At 4,000 rpm it has 170 rwkw

That's an average of 220 rwkw.

Higher average therefore faster accelerating and it would only drop from 260 rwkw to around 220 rwkw in the same 1,500 rpm bracket. Result = much easier to drive.

Hope that made sense.

*Now, read it, and stop talking about TD06's unless you all own a Mitsubishi Canter*

Sorry, that was way too harsh....had the 5am blues....rally didn't mean to say that like that...I meant to say

"now, stop talking about it

unless you own a Mitsubishi canter....."

In that i beleieve everything had been talked about here, and all the numbers have been shown... not that they are crap turbos so don't talk about them...i did not mean that

I honestly have no doubts that the TD06 could be a very effective turbo. I personally believe that running one on a 2.5 litre engine is not the best option. On a 3litre + engine i believe that could be very good, and would spool up 25% earlier. I have seen one on a diesel Hilux that was VERY interesting

I'm sorry if that sounded like me telling you you picked the wrong turbo, or that you are all worong, i really didn't mean that. I have personally never driven a car with a TD06..or for that matter any Trust turbos. I have driven a toyota hilux with one....that was scary. But the numbers coming out of the dyno graphs all seem to say the same thing, and spool up, at the bet off an RB25 was 4,000 rpm.... And i believe that does not add up to a very streetable turbo. But i could be wrong

Son of Sydneykid - Amended by Son of Sydneykid

..................................quote......................................

Now, read it, and stop talking about TD06's unless you all own a Mitsubishi Canter

..................................quote......................................

Hi, SydneyKid..thanks for the replied (not the ....quote.....part), and be honestly I do learn from it..but Were the fact and theory are brothers? Were they sometime back up each other and sometime don't due to some reason? I don't drive a canter, just what I saw is a bit different then theory..please don't take it as offense (I know you don't...hahaha..thanks.)

If there is any chance, we do love to offer you a drive..and maybe you can help us to find out why?..thaks

If I was to consider either a rework of my turbo or a garett combo what in your experience gives the best performance. Mick from Subzero now works were I take my car to so he says an exhaust manifold helps alot plus you know his plenums. For interest to back this up he is doing a standard turbo with exhaust manifold. Its on a friends car so should be interesting.

I would like to see 250rwkw for wank factor plus I believe this is a reasonable level to get to before needing injectors and maybe other internal mods. I have all else required.

So I could look at a Garett 3040 or a 3035. I would prefer to keep my origonal turbo however could have that reworked. End of the day though these all seem to pan out to the same cost.

Thanks

Hi Grepin

250rwkw is not a whole lot really. this is easily achievable with the hi flow, for a fraction of the cost... it simply bolts straight back onto the original exhaust manifold... very simple. you do not need such a large turbo for these figures. It is far simple and far more cost effective to simply get a Hi Flow job done on the existing turbo. Save the cash you save from not buying a new turbo and use it elsewhere on the car.

Son of Sydneykid

hey rob

it isn't the most effecient manifold, but for the 250rwkw, its sufficient... It is not an equal lenth manifold.... but its not worth spending the cash on another unless you are going way further than 250rwkw...In my opinion...but i will ask the old man

Son of Sydneykid

I guess I should have stated that to get 250rwkw that the standard manifold will do. However would a nicely designed manifold make it work all the better. I guess the proof will be in the car that is keeping the stock turbo however getting a manifold. Certainly a different way of going about things. Consider if I havent got it wrong it may be possible to get more top end out of a set up manifold. Like how it can be said that a larger turbo can be brought on boost earlier by a specifically designed manifold.

Sydneykid, so you havent had much experience with Garett turbos like 3040 etc. Cost wise considering Sacrifice $500 worth of turbo for a $2400 (GCG price) rebuild is more expensive than buying a Garett turbo (from $2300). Given the fact that I want to keep all my stock parts I would prefer to keep my turbo. The only reason to rebuild it is if it would be far superior than a garett turbo.

Cheers.

I hope I finally get it right when I do comit to something. Its even more frustrating when you have the money but no idea what to do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...