Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sounds exactly like the TV show dangerous. 3 robbers. 1 woman... I can't believe these knuckle heads can hit the same place over and over and still dont get caught. doesn't say much for our police force.

sounds exactly like the TV show dangerous. 3 robbers. 1 woman... I can't believe these knuckle heads can hit the same place over and over and still dont get caught. doesn't say much for our police force.

i was thinking copy cat to dangerous. yeah quality NSW police force lol

yeah that's barny's car (aaronrb25det i think that's his username)

the poor bugger put alot of work into that car and finally had it running smoothly after a tune from CRD.. then a few days later goooooooone.

happened a while ago now, I might give him a buzz so he can have a look at the article!

yeah that's barny's car (aaronrb25det i think that's his username)

the poor bugger put alot of work into that car and finally had it running smoothly after a tune from CRD.. then a few days later goooooooone.

happened a while ago now, I might give him a buzz so he can have a look at the article!

damn thats soooo gay.... i guess it had to belong to someone here but coz it had the SAU sticker....

but yes it sucks about the car..

Whats the world comin to, for cryin out loud :P . I hope these label bandits get whats comin to em, my deapest sympathies go out to the liner & its owner. Police out there pullen ova peeps for drivin around ( cruisin ) when this craps goin on ( not sayin po po cant do their job, but maybe focus on more serious things like theft! ), seems to me you can get away with theft easier than any type of road infringment :devil: .

So heart breakin :D .

Edited by JETR32
I can't believe these knuckle heads can hit the same place over and over and still dont get caught. doesn't say much for our police force.

You will find many of the shops that get done over just repair the shops back to the original state instead of adding extra security features so they are just as easy the 2nd and 3rd time as they were the first time. Just like a certain servo in Granville that gets done over every 2nd month because they put the ATM back in the same position right up against the front window in plain view without even being bolted down to anything. It's easier/quicker to just take the whole ATM then it is to swipe your visa card and wait for it to spit out the 50's.

Edited by benm
You will find many of the shops that get done over just repair the shops back to the original state instead of adding extra security features so they are just as easy the 2nd and 3rd time as they were the first time. Just like a certain servo in Granville that gets done over every 2nd month because they put the ATM back in the same position right up against the front window in plain view without even being bolted down to anything. It's easier/quicker to just take the whole ATM then it is to swipe your visa card and wait for it to spit out the 50's.

I used to managed CBAs ATM portfolio ....and can say most banks have a strict security code when it comes to the placement of their ATMs, and every time I used to see one placed at the front of a shop i used to cringe and count down the days before I got a call saying it got ram raided.

but you know... a few hundred grand to them is nothing in the scheme of things! And the owners of the shop are happy coz they still collect their rental and have their shop front repaired within a week and it's business as usual.

How smart are these theives they say.

The possibilty or likelihood of you getting pulled over in that car once a cop see's you is greater then any quick/new/stock vehicle, then their plans are buggered.

I'm curious to why they chose a modd'd skyline..sure there any easy target, but so are commondore v8's??

So sad to see that r33, couldve been any one of us...

well the ramraid vehicle of choice used to be pajero and rangies etc when this all kicked off 10 years ago. then they started using 4wd for the ramming and wrx for the getaway. for me it would have to be an F250 for the win. lol

Now we're talking - 'Ram raid vehicle of choice' thread.

I'd go for a Dodge SRT-10 (Pickup truck with a Viper engine!)... I saw one of those in Syd the other day... beast - pity its built like a Mitsubishi :laugh:

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
    • Ceste, jak se mas Marek...sorry I only have english keyboard. Are you a fan of Poland's greatest band ever?   
×
×
  • Create New...