Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've had to edit the crap out of the vid as it showed my number plate every where.

So don't mind the chops. :D

This was the initial start *note bits still hanging everywhere*

It was started with only the dump & front pipe on.

The lifter noise has since gone away as they require a few rev's and a bit of running to pump up.

I took her for a little drive. I'm going to have some fun with this RB30..

Acceleration away from the lights in a merging left lane is so so easy where auto's and playing around with the clutch to get off the line without looking like a hoon is no longer a worry.

I've wired the wastegate open as it was making boost all the time, as soon as I would touch the accelerator it would be on boost so it really isn't an option to run 11psi just off idle for the run in.

Its nice to be able to short shift in to the next gear and still power on with no hassles.

Ben, in your S13 its going to be an absolute weapon.

A very enjoyable weapon to drive around.

You could easily have a massive turbo that starts pulling from 4000-4500rpm with the 3ltr as it has so much off boost acceleration it doesn't really matter.

Drive a RB20DET then jump in to a RB25.. Note the difference then multiply that difference by an easy 2 as that is what the RB30 feels like.

It definitely feels like it has heaps more torque down low than my old VS V8 5speed Slugadoor.

EDIT: XVid Codec is required to view the video.

It can be found here - <click click>

It does almost feel like it needs a taller diff ratio though.

See how it goes once the turbo is up and overspeeding.. ;)

Excellent work!!!

Mine is due for collection next thursday, so hopefully i can be joining you in the RB30 goodness soon. I've been 7 months without a car.. so i'm in for a world of learning and grinning :D

Get some footage of the thing driving ;)

Mine is due for collection next thursday, so hopefully i can be joining you in the RB30 goodness soon

The bottom end is due to go into the workshop next week when the rods n pistons arrive. Only had the bottom end for 2 weeks, I want to drive it now! :burnout:

One quick question..

I've noticed since the RB30 it tends to turn over a little slower.

My old man tends to think it could be due to the rb20t starter motor not being designed for the larger motor in turn it draws more amps hence I may need a bigger battery.

Previously the battery was always really zippy in turning over the rb20t..

OR could it be that my earth to the block isn't that good due to paint?!?!?

OR is it just the motors fairly tight still??

I was in the car park yesterday, walked out from the shops went to turn it over and it only just turned over then stopped. I backed off and did it again this time starting.

I remember Darrens R32 RB30DET doing some thing similiar also.

I'm starting to think maybe it is the starter motor not designed for the bigger motor.?!?

It would be interesting to see if the part number varies between the RB20 and RB25 starter motors.

Hi, I think the problem is you are underestimating how much of pain in the ass it is to send an engine half way around the world.  Customs clearance, quarantine inspection, duty declaration, sea freight organisation, packaging and road transport to the wharf etc etc.  It's not so bad when you are sending an engine with some value, but is it the same amount of work for a $400 engine as it is for a $6,000 engine.  In fact it is even more work because a freshly built engine will pass inspection easily, a dirty, oily, old, used engine is not so easy.

Plus I guarantee you that you will not be able to rebuild an RB30 (to whatever spec) cheaper in the US than what we can downunder.  It's false economy, but your choice nonetheless. :mad:

Please get back to me. I wanna enjoy the motor just like everyone else is.

[email protected]

thanks

gus

When using an RB30 you need to be careful what one you use as there is two types, an hitachi and another type, this applies to VL not sure about R31 tho.

The hitachi is rated at 70amps.

Mines been great since using the 550CCA battery...no more startup probs....

yep but what i am saying is where you mount the second tensioner(original idler) the block isnt flat nor is it level with the machined surface that the other tensioner bolts to.

i can work it out myself i just thought you guys had already done it and would know what i needed to do

hrmm.. Not sure..

Its flat?!? other wise the origional idler wouldn't bolt up.

And when you say it isn't the same level... I will have to check that as mine was... :D

I simply bolted up the tensioner on above the waterpump and in the origional idler location and it was all sweet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...