Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

-Joel- ure getting better fuel econ? is that freeway driving or city driving? or both? what are you averaging a tank so far?

Thats local 80 & 60km/h driving.

I've always had decent fuel economy.. Roughly 500km's per tank.

On the dyno the O2 sensor was working pretty well. Under light acceleration it was in closed loop mode constantly with afr's no richer than around 13.8:1.

I put the car in to O2 sensor diag mode once and drove it around to see what it was doing.. As the dyno said i could accelerate with traffic and it would constantly sit in the closed loop mode. It took a couple pounds of boost before the O2 sensor would no longer be used and the ecu would refer to its maps.

Maybe this is why Darrens R32 Rb30DET wouldn't run on the base map of the PowerFC?!?! His O2 Sensor may be stuffed.

i think this had better be mentioned in the rb2530 conversion guide!
I think it should too.. :)

This is how the rb30 guide has came about.. People post their findings..

A few people keep things to their selves or can't be bothered helping out the thread once their rb30det is up and running. :D

BUT.. The blocks you have..

Do you know the origion of them? What car what year etc?

I asked this when buying mine from the wrecker.

Maybe its a Skyline block? not a VL? Doesn't explain the turbo block you have though...

I also have to make an adopter plate to fit a 4wd sump as it will be going into a GTS4.
Could you please post your findings with the Adaptor plate.. What needs doing etc.. Even take some pics.

I will put it in the guide for us SAUer's.

I would love to have an RB30 in a GTS4. Would be absolutely awesome..

You will know what I mean once you drive the RB30.. :D

In NA form with my turbo wastegate wide open it will easily spin up the rear wheels by simply putting your foot down as you take off.

I can see my theory of the rb30 being more linear so it will be easier to control wheel spin is going to be given a good workout.

I think it should too.. :)

 

This is how the rb30 guide has came about.. People post their findings..

 

A few people keep things to their selves or can't be bothered helping out the thread once their rb30det is up and running. :D

 

BUT.. The blocks you have..

 

Do you know the origion of them? What car what year etc?

I asked this when buying mine from the wrecker.

 

Maybe its a Skyline block? not a VL? Doesn't explain the turbo block you have though...

mate i pulled them all out myself. all from series 1 commodores and 2 of them were factory turbo

Joel are u getting decent fuel economy, cos your still on the run in stage, and havent been putting the foot in as hard as you were with the rb20? :D

Mine wasn't running on the std Pfc maps, cos of the air filter adaptor i reckons... :) made the normally 80mm hole down to 50mm or so...

Mine goes in for its full tune late this week, or early next, so watch out for its first full power run :D Only thing holding it back willl be the turbo and exhaust.. :(

My 02 sensor is the std one on on the car (read 12 years old) so id expect it to be dodgy like everything else was that i replaced...

TAKE NOTE EVERYONE - dont think this is a drop in job....most things have to be replaced due to age if yer slappin in a 500 hp motor :)

Darren,

If anything I expect the motor to use more fuel during its run in as the rings don't seal as well and you tend to get more ring blow by. Hence why a car will make less power when it is really fresh compared to when it is finally run in.

I actually drive it harder with the rb30, accelerate away fromthe lights quicker and am always putting the foot down to 1/2-3/4 when exiting corners.

Towards the end there I was so so sick of the gutless rb20t I used to just put it around. The having to rev it to get any where used to annoy me. :D

Yer there's definately a couple of little variables.. The pod adaptor and the o2 sensor.

How was your fuel economy previous to the rb30?

lol yer its not just a drop in job.. I replaced every single heater hose, all fuel line hose. Everything. Heater hoses were ~$500 all up, ouch. :)

Do you think you really need to run the 02 sensor with the Power FC etc?

Why not disconnect it and turn it off in the settings and then just have the car tuned without it?

The actual tune won't be affected by a bad O2 sensor BUT what it will affect is the light throttle cruise and idle as the 02 sensor trims the maps to suit the desired AFR (14.7:1).

With a dud O2 sensor fuel consumption in a RB20 or RB25DET will drop from close to 500km's per tank to high 200's to low 300's.

Over time they loose their response time and slowly fuel consumption increases.

This can create idle hunting issues as the O2 sensor is unable to adjust the fuel quick enough.. In turn it runs too lean then too rich etc. Not the nice happy medium with a fast responding O2 sensor.

Yes but with the PowerFC you can not set how much of the map you want the 02 to adjust..

It's better to tune without it than to worry if the one you have in there isn't working like it should be?

I'm going to try without the O2 sensors and see how it goes, I have seen cars tuned without them and they get good gas milage.

I also don't want to have to buy new GTR O2 sensors.. x 2 :P

Yes but with the PowerFC you can not set how much of the map you want the 02 to adjust..

It's better to tune without it than to worry if the one you have in there isn't working like it should be?

I'm going to try without the O2 sensors and see how it goes, I have seen cars tuned without them and they get good gas milage.

I also don't want to have to buy new GTR O2 sensors.. x 2 :D

Like the standard ECU, the PFC O2 feedback is self learning. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...