Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

RB30E (non turbo) with RB25DE head, everything internal standard, new rings, bearings gaskets and seals and all of the up & down and round & round stuff balanced. Made 475 bhp on the engine dyno, still going nearly 5 years later. Proves that if you keep the boost down (1.1 bar) ,service it regularly and tune it properly, it will last a long time.:cheers:

awesome. well i have a turbo head from my engine outa my other car. u think i shuld hunt down a turbo block or go for an n/a block ? sydney kid would you be able to pm me an avergae price and exact thigns you got done. im not after insane power. as i shall have that in my other car. (yes i know i shuld spend more money etc on it but *** it :cheers:)

awesome. well i have a turbo head from my engine outa my other car. u think i shuld hunt down a turbo block or go for an n/a block ? sydney kid would you be able to pm me an avergae price and exact thigns you got done. im not after insane power. as i shall have that in my other car. (yes i know i shuld spend more money etc on it but *** it :cheers:)

Go for an na block as the comp will be more suitable for more low down torque. But if you do find a turbo block change the pistons to na ones to get a decent comp.

It's easier to find an na block with the oil n water lines tapped like in na s2's.

awesome. well i have a turbo head from my engine outa my other car. u think i shuld hunt down a turbo block or go for an n/a block ? sydney kid would you be able to pm me an avergae price and exact thigns you got done. im not after insane power. as i shall have that in my other car. (yes i know i shuld spend more money etc on it but *** it :rofl:)

I don't care how much money you spend, if you have read this thread you will find I mentioned a guy I know who buys used RB30 bottom ends, whacks new rings, bearings and seals in it for an all up cost of ~$1200. He then sticks his good top end and turbo on it and goes racing. He usually ends up with around 500 rwhp, and he just races it till it blows up. He has been doing it for around 5 years and is on his 3rd bottom end. Around the same time I built a forged bottom end RB31 that cost me $6K, so he is still 2 engines worth ($2400) ahead.

He buys standard VL Commondoor parts, rings, bearings, gaskets and seals. Hones the bores, decks the block and gets the up & down and round & round parts balanced. That's it, no secrets, just a standard rebuild of an RB30E, any machine shop can do it.

The real "secret" is tuning and knowing the limits. He doesn't "sneak a bit more boost in", "rev it a bit higher", try for "just another 20 hp". It gets service regularly, uses good oil and the tune is checked often. It isn't tuned on the limit for fuel or ignition, the tune is a bit conservative everywhere. I mentioned "tune" 4 times, not by accident.

Hope that is of some help:cheers:

okay 93 pages is a bit much for me, need a quick answer for this one:

i am looking at purchasing an R33 RB25DE head, supposedly with VCT.

1. did they come with VCT?

2. is the presence of different cams the ONLY difference between this head and an R33 RB25DET head?

All R33 RB25 Heads have VCT.

As far as I'm aware the R33 RB25's have the same cam specs. Lobe centers and all.

The only difference is the VCT is engaged at a higher rpm on the N/A heads, this is controlled via the ECU.

The N/A heads do run softer valve springs which may cause a valve float at 1bar+ boost.

brilliant, good answer. thanks dude! i won't be running more than 1bar to reach 450hp so that'll do me just fine.

odd, though, that the turbo and n/a cams would be the same...... nissan must have got lazy and started mass-producing them cheaper.

this head is still a direct bolt-on (after i re-route the VCT feed of course, and blank off the hole in the head for it) to an RB30 block isn't it?

If the cam specs (lobe centers) are different for the N/A's it really doesn't cause any problems. I got the cam specs from the Tomei website.

There are a few discrepancy's with the specs on the table, so the specs they list for the r33 rb25 may not be 100% accurate.

If anything the N/A will be setup with a little more overlap which is good for top end breathing, this will benifit the 3ltr.

The head is a direct bolt on after the VCT mods.

I would still get the heads valve seat pressure checked out if anything at all.

Some heads I have seen have lacked seat pressure.

You need seat pressure to cool the valve.

Without in spec seat pressure you 'may' drop a valve. :(

yeah i see what you're getting at with the cam, either way it doesn't worry me. cams are one of the last things i would change to reach my target power. just wondering now if i should bother getting my rods cryo treated and shotpeened or just leave em........ ah i dunno.

the head i am looking is dissassembled completely, has everything there though. been crack tested, pressure tested and cleaned, the valves need re-seating but are fine apart from that. also wondering how much a head specialist would charge to do this..... might throw in some isky springs while i'm there, or can you add a shim to increase the seat pressure?

You can add shims to increase the seat pressure but this won't affect the springs tension and will still valve float at the higher boost levels.

If you are thinking about cryotreating rods etc then obviously you want 280rwkw+.

Go with the isky valve springs.

While your there let me know what they are worth as I will eventually be needing a set. :(

The stock rods are quite strong and don't see the as much side load as the rb20/25/26's.

I would think 300rwkw is a fairly safe number for a street driven RB that doesn't need to run stupid amounts of boost (due to det head) or over 6500rpm.

sorry, yeah i didn't think about that too much before i typed it.

my target is 350-400 ponies at the wheels (300kw or so) and i simply don't need any more than that. from all my calcs, i am pretty sure i'll only need about 14-15 psi at the most to achieve this (not from a turbo) so i should be right with stock cams etc. the rods i have are 300,000km old though, i am just not certain if i should get them cryo-treated (for stress relieving) and shotpeened or if i should just leave them.

the isky springs are $300-$350 a set i believe.

oh and from people who have actually done it, give me your opinions on whether or not it's worth re-routing the VCT and getting it working. bear in mind that i will be running an aftermarket ECU, stock cams and a blower which will have no lag so off-boost driveability is not a problem at all. (off-boost doesn't exist with this motor)

sorry, yeah i didn't think about that too much before i typed it.

my target is 350-400 ponies at the wheels (300kw or so) and i simply don't need any more than that. from all my calcs, i am pretty sure i'll only need about 14-15 psi at the most to achieve this (not from a turbo) so i should be right with stock cams etc. the rods i have are 300,000km old though, i am just not certain if i should get them cryo-treated (for stress relieving) and shotpeened or if i should just leave them.  

the isky springs are $300-$350 a set i believe.

I hope ur not using one of those toyota whipple blowers. :Bang:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...