Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I wont bother going in to the XR specs as we are comparing apples and apples. :D

Specs from here!

---- EL & AU Standard Ford 4ltr

157kW @ 4900 rpm.

357Nm @ 3000 rpm.

---- EL Standard Ford V8 5ltr.

EL - 165kw @ 4500 rpm.

EL - 388Nm @ 3000 rpm.

---- AU Standard Ford V8 5ltr.

175kw @ 4600rpm

395Nm @ 3000rpm

--------

VS Commodore Specs - From Here

---- Standard V6

147 kW @ 5200 RPM

304 Nm @ 3600 RPM

---- Standard V8 5ltr

165 kW @ 4400 RPM - 168kw for Series II -- wow

385 Nm @ 3600 RPM

Sorry to get a bit off topic peoples.. :(

Oh and if you ask why a VS will blow away a EL.. Slap a Manual in the El and a Manual in the VS then watch the EL fly..

The Auto g/boxes in the Falcoons are geared extremly bad.. 80km's in first isn't to good.

If you ask why a VS Auto will blow away a EL Auto.. The Ford's gearing is a lot longer than the Commodores.

Slap a Manual in the EL and you will be suprised how it actually kicks the VS Manual's arse :) If you ever come up against a Manual EL you will notice how quick they are off the line without stalling it up.. A VS V8 has no chance against it and has to reel it in very very slowly.

Hi Guys, you are looking at the horsepower figures and thinking 157 kw for a 4 litre 6 and comparing it to a 160 kw from an RB20DET 2 litre 6. But, take a look at the torque figures, 357 Nm vesus 263 Nm. That's 36% more torque (the V8 is 50%), that's good for turning the auto, stop start traffic, lugging the family, pulling the boat, towing the Skyline race car etc.

The average person who buys one of those (even though they probably don't even know it) is using the low rpm torque way more than the higher rpm horsepower. We, on the other hand like to use the horsepower.

As they say "horses for courses".

Just a quick note, Ford Turbo XR6 BA injectors= Bosh motorsport 560CC injectors. (One of my friends got them flow tested)

And at 87 bucks a injector from ford! it looks like the perfect injector if your running a custom fuel rail.

these injectors should have enough flow for 500-600HP =)

Not sure on imperdiance, i will check with Mr.multimeter when i get home!

I am now at the point were i will be looking for a computer. What type of computer are other people running with this conversion?

I have a couple of questions so bear with me!

MAP sensors? Were do they sit? AFM Vs MAP sensors? pros cons?

I have been looking around a little bit, heard some good stuff about the APEXI-FC, but it because of the AFM its not much good over 300RWKW.... =(

Anyone heard over the Apexi FC pros?? And what other computers use a MAP sensor?

Lots of questions, sorry its all over the place! =P

Cheers,

Trev

any details about the computer Sik32?

I want o get a little bit deeper than that! =)

e.g. How does it measure Air? AFM? MAP both??

what are you running AFM or MAP sensor? were does the MAP sensor mount? whats more accurate?

Microtech sounds ok for the price, but what can it do? is it a complete change over (plugn play computer)? data loging? specs?

Sorry about the questions i just need to know! =)

Cheers,

Trev

Thats fine so the micro tech uses a MAP sensor. NOw were is that located on the RB25? If its not there, (which i dont think it is because it uses a AFM) were do you install one?

Thanks for this dude!

I take it your going to be running the LT12?

if its the same litte black box that i think it is, thats for the electronic boost sensor for the factory gauge. (black box on a peg, with a black hose going into the plenum?)

Anyways in the spec that you posted it says the LT8 only has:

Inj Drivers 4

ign outputs 4

Dont we need 6 ? like the L12?? or are they additional ign & inj?

yer thats the one!!!

Im not expert but it's something to do with the LT8 runs sequential fire, which can still be used on skylines

But the LT12 has 6 which is direct fire ignition and injection. which would give better spark.

Im not worried about the spark, as i will be running 6 external bosch coils when i finish the conversion

Power FC will handle alot more than 300rwkw - in japan they use them on big hp applications. Downside is that you cannot remove the AFM, but AFM is good for street.

Wolf 3D will allow MAP or AFM, Autronic runs MAP, Microtec runs MAP, list goes on.

Have only heard good things about the new Wolf 3D V4.5#, but it will depend on what your tuner is comfy with. Autronic are very good too. One thing you will have with a wolf or autronic is that you can run injectors of either high or low impedance.

Do the ford injectors fit the stock runners? If they are high impedance they would be a good upgrade for RB20DET too.

Hi JNR24, firstly let's dispel a few myths. Here is the chart of AFM meters I use when working out which one/pair to use with a Power FC to achieve the horsepower target.

1 X RB20/25 AFM = 370 bhp = 220 rwkw

1 X Z32 AFM = 420 bhp = 260 rwkw

2 X RB26 AFM's = 475 bhp = 300 rwkw

2 X Z32 AFM's = 700 bhp = 470 rwkw

1 X Q45 AFM = 480 bhp = 300 rwkw

2 X Q45 AFM's = 850 bhp = 550 rwkw

With the Power FC you select the afm from the menu, simple.

A MAP sensor, as it say measures Manifold Absolute Pressure, so you can take the pressure hose from anywhere between the throttle butterfly and the inlet valves. Most people "T" off the boost sensor hose. Some ECU's have the MAP sensor itself built into the ECU box, so you just run the pressure hose to the ECU.

Others have a separate MAP sensor, with a short harness to the ECU, that you stick anywhere convenient.

AFM's, because they very accurately measure the actual air flowing into the engine, are quite simply the best method for determining how much air your engine is using and therefore how much fuel to add.

A MAP sensor simulates measuring airflow by measuring the pressure. It's pretty good, but simply can not be as accurate as an AFM. MAP's also have problems with multiple throttle butterflies (as in GTR's) as you have to take pressure readings from each cylinder. With large overlap camshafts this becomes a real problem at idle and low rpm.

AFM's are not without their own issues on very high performance engines. They measure airflow, it doesn't matter whether the flow is into the engine or out of it,. The AFM will measure it and the ECU will add the fuel. So if you have a big turbo, you can get airflow reversion when you close the throttle sharply and the AFM will measure the air as it goes in and then measure it again when it bounces back out of the turbo. Twice as much fuel as necessary gets added and the engine stalls. You can buy averaging boxes (HKS is one) that eliminate this problem, so that the engine returns to and maintains a stable idle after a rapid throttle closing.

So getting back to your original question, there is no doubt in my mind that for a road car there is nothing better than an AFM sensor driven ECU and that means Power FC. For $1300 you simply take it out of the box, plug it in and the car starts and runs nicely all within 10 minutes. Normal dyno fine tuning, as for any other ECU, would be necessary, before you rip into it.

If you are seriously looking for more than 500 bhp then you are going to have to spend around $20K on the engine and the necessary support systems for that amount of power. In that case I would recommend the Motec/Autronic level of ECU.

There are arguments for the Link, Microtec, EMS etc level of ECU. But as the price of Power FC's continues to come down and the availabilty of laptop tuning and data logging (via Datalogit software) this starts to become less relevant. Plus they are becoming even more common and workshops now have good experience with tuning them.

That's my 20 cents worth, hope it adds to the thread.

Hi JNR24, firstly let's dispel a few myths. Here is the chart of AFM meters I use when working out which one/pair to use with a Power FC to achieve the horsepower target.  

1 X RB20/25 AFM = 370 bhp = 220 rwkw  

1 X Z32 AFM = 420 bhp = 260 rwkw  

2 X RB26 AFM's = 475 bhp = 300 rwkw  

2 X Z32 AFM's = 700 bhp = 470 rwkw  

1 X Q45 AFM = 480 bhp = 300 rwkw  

2 X Q45 AFM's = 850 bhp = 550 rwkw  

With the Power FC you select the afm from the menu, simple.

Thanx for your post sydneykid, I am running a single turbo and am looking at power figuers of about 400-450 RWKW...... Anything in that chart over 300RWKW requiers two AFMs.....??

Is there away around this on a single turbo setup?

What computer would you recommend with this power figure in mind??

or just run a split air flow pipe from the turbo into two AFMS, with 2 air filters?? GTR styles????

Hi, JNR24, let me make sure I have this right, you are looking at an 800 bhp, single turbo, manual gearbox, 2 wheel drive application?

If that is the case, then I would personally go for a Motec ECU. You are going to benefit from the functionality of models from the M48 Pro (with Advanced Tuning Options) upwards as follows;

data logging

traction control

launch control

full closed loop control using fast and wide lambda sensing

32 bit processing

individual injector trim

individual cylinder ignition trim

air temperature compensation

engine temperature compensation

exhaust gas temperature compensation

over run boost enhancement (anti lag)

wastegate control

gear position compensation

soft and hard rpm limits

intercooler spray control

For that level you are looking at around $6K installed and wired with a base map for running in the engine. With normal tuning do and charge following that.

Hope that is of some help

I've posted this before in another thread, but here it is again.

It's a chart with the different computers and the main features each has so just click here

i've got a HKS FCONV, no idea what features it has but i've been told they are very good if you can find someone to tune it (which hopefully i have).

Cheers,

Andrew

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...