Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

some power plus some grippy tyres= destroyed RB20 gearbox

Any decent clutch will see out a rb20 gearbox, i have been running a extreme h/d with ceramic clutch plate for along time with 234rwkw and it had handled the power well. I recently fitted a GTR mechanical LSD to the rear of my car and took it too the drags after i put some decent tyres on the rear the gearbox has almost killed itself.

My conclusion is 200+rwkw rb25 gearbox and over 250rwkw twin plate clutch should be used. Will be picking up my rb25 box tomorrow for $1200.

Originally posted by Skyrine-Dave

what sort of clutch would be good to use with the RB20 box to handle the extra power?

One that slips..hehehe. Power always looks for the weak link, upgrade the clutch and it will move down the drive line. I would say in Clints case it was probably the tyres, therefore when the new tyres went on, the gearbox took pole position.

Hey Guys,

I'm thinking more seriously about the RB30 block for my immanent re-build.

My concern tho is the height added by the RB30 block, as I read previously in this thread, the bonnet just closes.

I have a custom plenum on my car, and we had to manufacture a bit of a hole in the sound proofing stuff on the underneath of the bonnet, so the plenum wouldn't rub. So if the RB30 block raises the whole height of the engine, I think I would have a bit of a problem ??? What do ya reckon ??

(The bit that rubs is the throttle body <-> plenum flange)

Ok.

I want to do it cheaply also.

So when will we be able to see pics of the parts / setup to get VCT working & get the cam the oil it needs at the same time?

You guys are talking about rb25DE heads what about a R33 gts25t converstion ? what compression ratio will a RB25DET head on a RB30 block with standard NA pistons be ?? what will it be ? will it work ??

If you buy a good RB30 NA could you get away without rebuilding it ? Why does it have to be rebuilt when these engines go for half a million k's without any troubles ?!?

Will the oil lines / water lines off the turbo have to be modified because of the difference in the block lenth ? and how much longer is it actually ?

I wonder if my Nizmo strut brace will fit..... Anyway are we working on a full guide for this conversion using standard R33 bits ??

Hi Guilt-Toy, You asked .................

**what compression ratio will a RB25DET head on a RB30 block with standard NA pistons be ?? What will it be ?

Compression ratio will be 8.3 to 1

***will it work ??

Yes, did it 5 years ago, made 475 BHP on a small turbo.

***If you buy a good RB30 NA could you get away without rebuilding it ?"

Shoot, for a few hundred bucks for a set of rings and bearings and a balance, why the heck wouldn't you?

***Why does it have to be rebuilt when these engines go for half a million k's without any troubles ?

Is it worth the risk, spend a few hundy refreshing it and feel safe. Or spend a few hundy pulling the engine back out again when something is wrong.

**Will the oil lines / water lines off the turbo have to be modified because of the difference in the block lenth ?

The block is the same length, so they fit straight up.

**and how much longer is it actually ?

The block is the same length, it is around 30 mm taller though.

**Anyway are we working on a full guide for this conversion using standard R33 bits ??

You have got to be kidding. This is so simple. What I do is put an RB30E on one engine stand and an RB25DE (or DET) on another engine stand. I unbolt everything from the head gasket up on the RB30E and throw it away That leaves me with an RB30E bottom end.

I then unbolt everything from the head gasket up on the RB25 and bolt it onto the RB30E bottom end. I then bolt the RB25 oil pump, water pump, harmonic balancer and sump onto the RB30E block. Drill and tap the holes for the cambelt and tensioner and stick on the belt. Then bolt up the RB25 flywheel and clutch.

All finished, takes about 6 hours, and I'm slow.

Hope that helps

PS; My N1 strut brace fits fine.

  • Like 1

my understanding is that the RB25DE head is the same as the RB25DET head, but with different cams. It will work with the RB25DET head but it's cheaper to get an RB25DE, plus it means you can have the whole engine ready to swap into the car. You don't have to spend time taking apart the other engine. And if there is something wrong with the head, then your car is undrivable. The main reason for reabuilding is that you may as well while the engine is out of the car. Means that you know everything is in good order before you put it in the car. The water lines/oil lines may need to be modified, but that won't be a big deal. If you use an n/a RB30 then you will have to drill the holes and tap them.

I think the R32's are the only ones that have trouble with having the strut brace... but someone that's done the conversion will say for sure

I'm gonna be taking photo's of everything i do, and also documenting it all.

Edit: Looks like Sydneykid finished his explanation before me!!! :P

**Anyway are we working on a full guide for this conversion using standard R33 bits ??

Yep coming allong VERY nicely! =)

Cause of all this good shit in here! so keep talking guys.

The guide so far covers:

-Heapes of comparison photos of RB30 vs RB25 vs RB26 parts. (oil pumps/water pumps/flywheels/cranks/flywheels etc)

-Compression Ratios with diffrent combination of pistons E.g (RB30 DET vs RB30NA)

-What belts & gaskets to buy

- how to retain VCT (step by step with photos)

- Price guide (everything broken down)

- Installation of the motor.

- Cooling comparisons (Stock Oil & water coolers) Effectiveness VS Cost

- Fuel system (Pumps/ injectors / rails/ regs)

- Computers (Best to suit this conversertion (availability, tunability & price all kept in mind)

- Photos photos & more photos!!!

Its practicly a picutre book!

7 rolls of film so far, only about %65 through the guide! =)

Hi guys. Matlowth's at 320 rwkw is the most powerful I have heard off with a standard AFM. We usually see max voltage at 260 rwkw. Although the max voltage normally occurs at the max torque rpm first, not the max horsepower rpm. I would have no real problems tuning at airflow past max voltage, it just requires a bit of extrapolation of the RPM and TPS maps. It is more accurate (and safer) to have some resolution though.

The 320 rwkw would normally see us reaching max voltage on a Z32 AFM. In fact I have a rule of thumb that says if we are aiming for more than 300 rwkw, I go straight for the Q45 AFM.

Hope that helps

These Q45 AFM, were can you them from?

so far i have heard there as rare as rocking horse shite!, and when you do find them they cost big $$$

were do you get yours from?

What motor are they off of? is the motor aussie manufactured?

what car are they out of?

cheers,

Trev

are there any alternative AFMs you can use? besides the Z32 & q45?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...