Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My crank has been balanced and all the rest of it, and it regularly see's 7500rpm.

I know of one running to 9000rpm running a factory (abeit modified) crank.

Anything past 7-7500 and I think you'd need to look at aftermarket rods.

Cheers,

matt

hey guys,

anyone looked into the safe RPM limit of an RB30?

I have spoken to someone who said that anywhere over 6600rpm is asking for trouble. I was looking at using a 7000rpm limit, but was told i would be treading lightly on reliability.

any info?

what about a viscous-filled harmonic balancer?

i had/have the option to go for eagle rods, but i have been told they are heavier than standard, altho stronger.

prepped arb30 rods would be easier to source in the event of a breakage too i would imagine... and more cost effective

if you have rods, and pistons all balanced with the crank and flywheel/clutch then you should be able to take it past 7500 no problem. But the power levels will be big well before 7500rpm so you don't really need to take it past that. An Rb25 harmonic balancer is also a good idea, but as sydneykid will tell you, he uses new RB30 ones with no problems!

Andrew

Re: visous balancer - not too sure.

If you can afford it, I'd go the aftermarket rods just for that extra piece of mind.

If you really want to rev hard, spend the $$ and get the crank balanced too.

Can I ask why you're concerned with reving to 7500rpm?

My motor makes peak power around 5800-6000rpm and thats with bigger cams and a turbo that'll flow roughly 700hp. They don't need to rev as hard as a 26 to make power.

Cheers,

matt

All motors have inherant harmonic issues, so you can't single out the RB30. You'll notice that anyone building up a "decent" modified V8 has plenty of aftermarket harmonic balancers to choose from, and this part is generally always changed.

Unfortunatley, the options from Japan for the RBxx series are the ATI/HKS fluid damper ($1200), the Greddy billet alluminium hub (no balancer, ~$600) or a Route 66 rubber damper ($1000). The ATI item is the best available, buying it through HKS also gives you the pulleys, if you go direct to ATI you can get it a hell of alot cheaper but no pulleys (go go Gadget fabrication) and there are 8 or to choose from with alloy or steel shells.

Having said that, there are plenty of RBxx motors using a standard one without any dramas. However, at high RPMs I think that the harmonic balancer contributes to oil pump failure and also crank damage - I've seen a few RB26 cranks with the keyway split or the hub for the oilpump damaged.

So I guess you can add this part for a no-holds-barred, no beg-your-pardon's type motor. But it's not a necessity.

i just wanted to make sure i could take it to 7000rpm limit and not be shattering any oil pumps :( I would like to go forged rods but have heard melancholy stories about eagle rods and cannot afford 2k for carillio/argo's.

On an RB30 i would consider anything over 8000rpm as high revs. From the reading i've done, anything under that i fine. An RB26 i would consider over 9000rpm as high revs.

RB25 balancer will go on the RB30. All RB balancers do (i've been told by people i believe). I will know for certain in a week or so :(

Andrew

All inline 6 cylinder engines are internally balanced, therefore the clutch and harmonic balancer do not have to "carry over" any external weighting and are neutrally balanced.

Looking at an RB26 vs an RB30 balancer there is not much external difference, but given the fact that the RB26/25 are a later model motor I would assume that they are both a) made from better materials and processes and B) there is less chance of the rubber cushioning material to be damaged since it should be a lower mileage motor.

It all comes down to the fact, how much horsepower can you afford to make?

edit: all the RB series are interchangable, from harmonic balancers to flywheels/clutches.

From every one I've spoke to who have built high reving RB30's and making over 700hp they all tend to change (or stiffen up) the bottom end by using an aftermarket cradle & different re-inforced sump.

Apparently by stiffening up the bottom end it shifts the harmonic issues higher in the rpm range that will never be touched.

Not once was it mentioned people playing around with harmonic balancers.

?!?!?!

Oh - I forgot to mention - the RB30 I mentioned earlier which rev's to 9000rpm (and makes 800-850hp) was a GTR - so the bottom end is stiffer because of the front diff. The torque is what warps the blocks though - not the revs. Although I haven't heard of any twin cam RB30's doing that.

On another note - what are people doing with the head studs? I'm still using factory ones - but has anyone gone bigger?

Cheers,

matt

From every one I've spoke to who have built high reving RB30's and making over 700hp they all tend to change (or stiffen up) the bottom end by using an aftermarket cradle & different re-inforced sump.

The RB25 and RB30 harmonic balancers, whilst being physically interchangeable appear to have a different construction as already mentioned. However the point of interest is that they also have consequently different states of harmonic tune as they have differing effective weighting on the damper section. Speculating, one would assume it is to compensate for the different harmonic characteristics of the different cranks i.e. the RB30 is a longer stroke than the RB25. I have long wondered about the harmonic issue talked about at 7500 RPM, but it seems no one has ever done a proper test to see what exactly is going on. Is it a TORSIONAL harmonic issue? Is it a BENDING moment issue? Anyone ever had a close look at the damper used on the Autospeed monster RB30 by Nispro? That looks like it has substantially more mass to it on the damper ring.

For my long serving RB25/30 I used the RB30 balancer with no apparent long term effects, and a strictly enforced 7000 RPM limit. Without testing though I can't say wether or not it was the right decision.

The "AFM = restriction" is a myth, you just have to have the right sized one for your application.  Spread the word.

not so much the afm , but the rest of the inlet piping may cause a very high restriction , as seen on the test on the vl turbos inlet on autospeed.

but i agree with u , correct size of afm for ur application and it wont hinder anything.

 

On another note - what are people doing with the head studs? I'm still using factory ones - but has anyone gone bigger?

 

Cheers,

 

matt

why does everyone rave on about head studs , why not use the original stretch bolts , but use a torque to yeild ratio when tourqing them down. instead of just bolting it down to the specs in a work book.

sydneykid - do u agree with me or do u see no need for it?

and as for rod bolts , im still not sure if arp make ones to suit an rb30 rod , though a simple way around it is using sr20 bolts , just need to buy 2 sets (as there is four pairs in one set , 4 cyl's of course)

I was curious more than anything else... As I mentioned - my car still uses factory ones.

Re: rod bolts - not too sure about ARP bolts, but I've got Tomei rod bolts which are around about the same price.

Cheers,

matt

why does everyone rave on about head studs , why not use the original stretch bolts , but use a torque to yeild ratio when tourqing them down. instead of just bolting it down to the specs in a work book.

sydneykid - do u agree with me or do u see no need for it?

and as for rod bolts , im still not sure if arp make ones to suit an rb30 rod , though a simple way around it is using sr20 bolts , just need to buy 2 sets (as there is four pairs in one set , 4 cyl's of course)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...