Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Would anyone be able to tell me if these measurments would fit my car? Im planning on buying rims tommorow but because my car is at the machanics i have no car to test on.

Size is:

17"x9 with +18offset

Im just wondering if theres any modifications needed to fit these?

Would it clear calipers?

Would it rub gaurds?

Im also running on cusco adjustable suspensions if that helps!

Thanks guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/155713-17x9-on-a-r33-s2-with-18-offset/
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hrrmmmm your right it does stick out of gaurds roughly 3 cms. With my coilovers lowered it will hit the gaurds. And the insurance company said that itll be illegal to have the whell sticking out of gaurds.

Anyone have any ideas what i should do?

I was planning on having my gaurds rolled out and raise the suspension.

Would that make it more legal, or should i sell out the rims?

Edited by cjlancer

You will deff need to roll the guards dude.

Those offsets are for gtrs which have a more pumped guards than gtsts..

Sell the rims,

And get offsets at min or 30 for a gtsts..

30 front, you might just have to roll it a little..

Anything below 30 offset, will just hit the guards easily.. plus it will look gay anyways.. lol

I reckon for 17inch rims, 32 offset front, 35-37 offset rear is best combination..

Plus you already have 9inch wide rim.. It will look phat!!

Btw is that 17*9 all the way around?

Im not to sure if the fronts will fit then.. AS in, it might touch your coilovers..

In short, those rims are for GTR's!!

Edited by siddr20

Ive got some stretched tyres at the front already with 235s, rears are 265. But it causes alot of camber wear.

It is 17*9 all 4 rims, might really have to think about selling em.

But i really like these drifteks man, anyone got any to swap =)

Edited by cjlancer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...