Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  R31Nismoid said:
Not really, just pointless trying to help people that dont want it.

wrxhoon has summed it up perfectly. I need say no more.

Its either you believe or you dont, and if you dont believe... its more likely than not that you will when your pistons eat a cermic breakfast

Oh, btw, making it richer wont save it from pegging a turbo wheel

At least he will get to blow it up himself, I didn't , someone else did it for me .

I think even then he won't believe he will think his pistons melted, maybe to much carbon?? He will try to find something to blaim other than the ceramic shit of the exhaust tubo wheel..

Geez guys, didnt know I touched you so deeply- its the internet, relax.

You have your opinion, I have mine.

Have I missed something here. I asked a while ago "whats the most boost you have run RELIABLY" on your RB26, no probs. Any more then 14 psi is a risk. OK, noted, advice taken!

I did my tests, its still running the same boost before the intercooler as what it did before with the stock cooler. Because the IC that is on it flows more, it resulted in less restriction giving more boost at the maniold.

Sure there may be some additional exhaust pressure from the increase in power.

Why get upset? Im not going to run any more boost then what it does already.

Im not pushing any more boost then what its been on for the past year.

Now all of a sudden, my turbo's are at risk?? And my engine will eat ceramic dust? Maybe I should have measure exhaust back pressure before and after. Just to keep you guys happy..

I am not giving you guys a hard time on your theory, I respect that and even asked to look at the pistons, then I get my head bitten off? Who gives a shit, what do you have to loose.

The Japs have had more of these for longer then us, so has the UK. I dont recall any mention of engines blowing up when a turbo goes until recently, and its only in australia.

Cubes- I asked the tuner about it. He already tried it when working for advan and you cant run more timing or leaner on a stock internal RB26 and the boost level wont justify it. You just get to the point of increasing timing and it doesnt increase toque/power, keep going a few more degrees and it will knock--- EDIT Actually come to think of it the cooler intake temps would be of benefit

Edited by amosite

the fact of the matter is simple, it can and will fail soon

the mean time between failure is rapidly advancing on 15 year turbochargers.

if you can afford to rebuild it keep going and dont worry

if you cant and dont want to fork out the 5 or 6k to rebuild it and buy new turbochargers then replace the stockers now. either with oem steel wheelies, larger steel wheelies or some other bolt on stock-er-look-a-likes

but for god sakes, dont keep going thinking it wont fail, cos it will

and when it does, youll be upset cos it will be rebuild time

we dont care that you are making xyz on zyx boost or xzy on stock turbo's

but you need to know that its a timebomb and youll regret it when it fails, unless you have unlimited money

thanks for the pics on the fet coils, it was enough for what I wanted. I just wanted to check if they were the same as some coils I saw in japan last month (they weren't ;) )

best of luck with it. btw, what is the record at EC etc?

i can tell you that you should definately make more top end with the cam geard, and more midrange. you can balance one against the other, but a gain of both is possible.

  amosite said:
"...Reallyonly trying to prove a pont that 400 rw hp can be made with bolt on's and stock turbo's..."
  amosite said:
I have nothing to prove to you guys,

Sure about that

  amosite said:
I doubt it will need a rebuild, the tune is safe. Timing is realistic and AFR's are on the rich side. No lean spool, tuned by one of the best in Sydney who tunes all over the world.

Lets get past the my dads bigger than your dad crap and talk..., I have arguably the best tuner in Perth tune my car and his words to me were and i'm paraphrasing here "It will make 450 at the wheels at 1.4 bar but i wont be able to tell you for how long". And that's the point, I bet I can make 500 at the wheels...but for how long. Hooray for people experimenting cause thats how we move forward; but mate its been done and done and done, there is nothing to prove. Except to your mates. You will need a rebuild because nothing last forever and certainly not a a 17 year old RB

I have an 89R that makes 430RWHP on the original build...I blew one of my turbos at 10K kilometers ago at 13 psi/336 RWHP (from memory). My engine is still making good HP and shows no signs of expiring due the ingestion of a ceramic wheel, But there is a body of evidence to say that... (A) Ceramic wheels dont last long at +13psi in a car driven in a "spirited fashion" and (B) Engines expire when that happens.

Just because you dont believe it doesnt make it go away. Get past the ceramnic dust issue on concentrate on the very probably having to fix a broken car issue

As for your original request for help.

Cam gears... to give you more tuning options

Dumps...proven HP on investment.

injectors...maxing them out soon

Fuel pump..its old now

Your a smart guy by the sounds of it I dont know why you've asked for peoples advice but they've given it to you. You've however seem to have chosen to ignore it. Good luck with that, really. ;)

  amosite said:
The Japs have had more of these for longer then us, so has the UK. I dont recall any mention of engines blowing up when a turbo goes until recently, and its only in australia.

I think it might have something to do with global warming

Edited by Angus Smart
  andz69 said:
lol

most of these so called "eggsperts", giving advice, don't own a GTR

Happy Valentine's day...hope y'all get a date

Chill

I don't know about you dude but I have owned several GTRS , I still have 2 in my garage and whats more , I can't remember how many times I have built an RB26 .

Having said that I'm definitely NOT an expert, I just post facts, what I have seen with my own eyes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...