Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was having a discussion with a friend today about LSD's, and it made me think up a few questions. I know that when a tyre spins, it makes the car want to pivot around that axis (the tyre), so wouldn't that mean that a car *without* an LSD would tend to lose the rear end (ie: fishtail) *more* than a car with an LSD (ie: it is more dangerous in the wet than with a car with an LSD)?

So, with my original situation where I was going around a LH turn at a constant 50 km/h up a hill, the inside (LH) rear tyre would be the most likely to spin since it has the least weight on it and it has drive torque passing through it. I was under the impression that once the LSD senses that tyre spinning, it would lockup the diff to a certain percentage, thereby allowing some drive torque through to the RH rear tyre. That should stop the LHR tyre spinning, thereby correcting the slide (well, this should all happen before the car starts sliding, but anyway...). So, the only reason that I would be sliding is because the drive torque passing through the RHR tyre has overpowered the amount of grip available, and now *both* rear tyres are spinning, thereby causing the car to lose rear end grip and thus oversteer? Basically, what I'm asking is, did my car start to slide because only the LHR tyre was spinning (the first paragraph), or because *both* rear tyres were spinning? If it's the former, then would that make my LSD stuffed? If it's the latter, I presume my LSD is working, but wouldn't that mean that cars equipped with LSD's are actually more dangerous to drive in the wet than with cars that have open diffs? I'm all confused now... :happy:

And finally, what about when you see two tyre marks left on the road as a result of a burnout? That means that the tyre with the least grip has lost grip, which has sent torque to the other rear tyre, which was then overpowered by that torque? But why do both tyre marks look about the same "darkness"? Shouldn't one be much darker because that tyre is spinning faster than the other (ie: the wheel that initially lost grip)?

What did you mean by Skylines having better balance, therefore equalling more wheelspin? Do you mean front/rear weight distribution, or having more "neutral" handling characteristics, ie: not as understeer-biased as the Calais?

Yes, more neutral. If a car is understeer biassed and you put your foot down the rear grips, the front scrubs and you go straight ahead. If a car is neutral and you put your foot down the back wheels spin and you get oversteer.

Now re your above post... Your comment about the car pivoting around the spinning wheel is false IMO.. I don't believe it works that way.

When you have no LSD then the tyre with the least grip will spin. The thing is, this is unpredictable and the spinning tyre can change from moment to moment. Hence, yes, you can fishtail and lose it with an open diff in the wet because when you correct, the weight shifts and the other wheel spins up, making it snap back on you.

A V-LSD is in some ways almost as bad because the LSD action is related to SPEED differential. Not applied torque from the engine. So you must have some wheelspin in order for the LSD to start working. Again, if you have small amounts of wheelspin it can behave like an open diff. My R33 is really quite twitchy in the wet sometimes.

A clutch type LSD operates on torque - the more torque the more LSD action so they are much better LSDs.

Then you've got locked diffs - by which I mean there is no differential action both wheels always rotate at the same speed. This is bad for handling, bad for tyre wear and bad for your rear bushes. Not to mention really bad for grip unless your wheel is pointed dead straight. HOWEVER, with a locked diff you always know that any wheelspin means both wheels are spinning, and they are very predictable in that respect. Of course, if you don't know how to drive then you WILL end up reversing it into a tree because you thought that giving it a hit around a wet corner was a smart idea. Totally dangerous and illegal. But fun. Apparently. :rofl:

Regarding your rain problem, I'd say you spun the inside wheel, as it had less grip. Then the V-LSD saw a speed differential between the wheels and started transferring torque to the outside wheel. Since the engine is now revving harder through the spinning wheel you've got more torque available and this overpowers the other rear wheel and then you're going sideways.

Regarding your rain problem, I'd say you spun the inside wheel, as it had less grip. Then the V-LSD saw a speed differential between the wheels and started transferring torque to the outside wheel. Since the engine is now revving harder through the spinning wheel you've got more torque available and this overpowers the other rear wheel and then you're going sideways.

Hmm... that's exactly what I originally thought was happening. But then I started thinking about the "inside wheel acting as a pivot" concept and it started to make sense. I mean, thinking about the initial corner, I wasn't really applying all that much throttle, so was it really possible for the other wheel to become overpowered? That's the bit I was getting confused with. I would understand if I were applying WOT or I was in a low gear, but I wasn't. I was literally just trying to maintain a constant speed, albeit on a relatively steep hill and turning a (gentle) corner.

With "V-LSD", are you referring to a viscous-type LSD? Because I was under the impression that these were an option on the GTS-T, and are quite rare? They are apparently the same type of diff as used in the GTR. So that would mean that I should have the more common, and theoretically, more secure, clutch-type LSD?

Anyway, is there any way to check to see if my diff is stuffed? I mean, a proper, controlled test, not just one where I go to the nearest corner, stomp on the accelerator and see if I still have drive? Well, the answer to that last part is "yes", I can still feel drive going to the tyre with the lesser grip, but whether the amount of torque being transferred is how much it's supposed to be, I don't know. This is what I want to find out. And if my LSD is stuffed, how much am I looking at to get it fixed or replaced?

Yep, he offered me an "excellent price". I had no idea of their going price, but I was planning to buy some performance Bridgestones (can't remember which but I think they'd just placed highly in a Wheels or Motor tyre test) and these Nexens were close to half price. He told me stories of how previous customers had also come in wanting to buy expensive tyres but had supposedly taken his advice and bought the Nexens, even with a money-back guarantee, and he'd only heard good feedback from them. I wasn't overly keen on spending $1000+ on tyres at the time, so I went with the ~$550 Nexens. Guess I'll know what to say next time eh?

I think its quite obvious how much respect I have for salespeople, especially commission-based ones, so I won't go into a massive rant.

"Good customer feedback" without some kind of auditable paper trail means about as much as "new and improved taste" or "if you only see one movie this year....."

tis the tyres for sure.

the stockies have shit tyres on em ( i killed the other ones, and couldnt be f**ked spending heaps on tyres for the gay stockies so meh ).

hence why i try to avoid driving if its heavy rain... coz i tend to go nowhere fast except sideways or wheelspinning. :D

With "V-LSD", are you referring to a viscous-type LSD? Because I was under the impression that these were an option on the GTS-T, and are quite rare? They are apparently the same type of diff as used in the GTR. So that would mean that I should have the more common, and theoretically, more secure, clutch-type LSD?

yes, viscous. they are standard on GTS-t models, active LSD (A-LSD) was an option on them - it is a computer controlled clutch type diff and you will have a dash light inside your tacho if you have it. Unless someone has replaced the diff in your car then there's a 95% chance you have a viscous LSD in it.

The GTR has a mechanical (clutch type) rear diff, that much I am certain of. I'm not sure about the front diff.

driving a powerfull car in the wet with a light rear end is absolutely dangerous if your a fool like me and stab the throttle everywhere... Wheelspinning in 4th is pretty bad. So just take it easy in the wet and drive slow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...