Jump to content
SAU Community

Who Has ASDL


Recommended Posts

I have netspace... and it works well for me with no reliability problems.

512kbps/128kbps - 7gig peak+7 gig offpeak (downloads only). That plan is $100/month.

If you want the 6gig flat (still just counts downloads) $70/month, plus $99 connection charge

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15848-who-has-asdl/#findComment-324186
Share on other sites

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by predator666

I have netspace... and it works well for me with no reliability problems.  

512kbps/128kbps - 7gig peak+7 gig offpeak (downloads only). That plan is $100/month.  

If you want the 6gig flat (still just counts downloads) $70/month, plus $99 connection charge

so the $70 per month plan is still at 512kbps? whats the fastest u have been able to download at? also did u buy your own modem or did it come with the package?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15848-who-has-asdl/#findComment-324193
Share on other sites

i had my own modem from when ADSL first became available in the country... its a speedtouch home. I've been on Telstra and netspace, and i'd never ever go back to Telstra.

Yes, the $70 plan is still 512kbps... $239 for 12month contract covers the connection+USB modem....or $50 if you buy a modem separately.

Anyway mate, full details here: http://home.netspace.net.au/adsl/plans.php

Fastest i guess is 55k/sec.. Depends where or what i am downloading from...but gues i get above 40k/sec most times.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15848-who-has-asdl/#findComment-324227
Share on other sites

denham: you're an engineer.. do the maths! you're not going to get above 55k/sec .. 512kbps = 64,000k/sec + all associated packet overheads = about 56-58k/sec MAX in an ideal world. If you want faster, pay more for a 1.5mbps plan. Email you'll get faster than that because its text and it compresses it (except for movie and zip files, etc).

andy: its not heaps faster, just more reliable and you get more value for money to what Telstra offers. I'd definitely change to another provider if you have the chance. Telstra doesn't deserve any business due to their business practices IMHO. They've outsourced a lot of their IT, call centres and things overseas these days.. and prolly accounting soon :D

I've been both on TElstra ADSL, and Telstra Cable... and the best so far has been my current Netspace connection (which i've had for 12 months)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15848-who-has-asdl/#findComment-324269
Share on other sites

So ADSL then ???

I'm going to finally get net at home in the next 2 months... so i need to know.

$239 connection fee? i Spose it's worth it ??

I'm thinking of the base 512 plan looking at that.

As if i'm gonna D/L 6 gb!!!

I don't do movies, just need good speed.

Gord... When it has 512/128 is that peak/off peak ? (even if you choose the flat 512 plan)

sorry for all the questions. I've got no ideas but i must have a fast connection.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15848-who-has-asdl/#findComment-324302
Share on other sites

I reckon ADSL is the go. Cable they've stopped rolling out to areas, and doesn't offer anything that ADSL does.

There are cheaper plans and speeds than that if you want them. Netspace has the entry level 256kbps plan with 1gig for $50/month. You might be suprised how quickly you do once you get used to it though. Recently i've been downloading the animatrix clips - they have been 150meg each.

Sounds like i'm working for netspace now (maybe i should :D) - but peak is 7am to 12am monday to friday.. weekends and other times is offpeak.

There are plenty of other providers that people also use ...even i-PumpAss or something (hehe). Like Leon.T was saying www.whirlpool.com.au has lots of information.

p.s. you can write parts of it off if you use it for business use too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15848-who-has-asdl/#findComment-324323
Share on other sites

I've been using Internode 512/128k (54k/s download, 13k/s upload) for 1 year now and its fantastic, wouldnt switch to anyone for anything.

No point with cable anymore unless your cable provider has unmetered goodies.

A typical page will fully load before my 512k connection even gets a chance to max out the connection (unless its got lots of images). Most pages only get up to around 30k/s by the time they are completely loaded so having a ~8mbit cable connection is kinda wasting things alittle (for general use).

Originally I was on the 4.5gb plan, a month later that was upgraded to the 8gb plan and about 4mths ago they released the new FlatRate plans (miles better then any "unlimited" plan).

1 thing no 1 has mentioned are the contention ratios.

General Dialup = 10:1 (10 user accounts per 1 user account of bandwidth).

Comindico Resellers = 30:1

Datafast = 30:1

Internode FlatRate = 8:1

So obviously the lower the contention ratio the higher chance you have of getting full speed 24/7.

Another thing you may want to look at are the additional services offered. Things like unmetered games servers, unmetered download mirrors, etc etc.

Still though my professional decision would be the 512/128k FlatRate plan for $99.95/mth.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15848-who-has-asdl/#findComment-324358
Share on other sites

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by Raza

its funny .

ive been with captus as u call it for a few years nows  

and for some good reason i can still go over10 gig and im not even close to red line.

could be because mycomputer had prob's when they tryed to network them.

and i still get my share of over 600K a sec downloads

die bitch die

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15848-who-has-asdl/#findComment-325200
Share on other sites

lol i remember optus

i still got screenies of me downloading at 1000kb/sec

but now back on dial up

cos im not paying for internet with caps!

what about tpg, they have unlimited broadband for onli 70 bucks i heard

but i think its a 256k connectoin

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15848-who-has-asdl/#findComment-325230
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...