Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There's a few here in SA that have basically just been bolted on.

It appears ~20psi makes a shade over 300rwkw.

I'd assume the difference between 20psi making 340-380rwkw and 20psi making a shade over 300rwkw is nice exhaust manifolds, plenums and a decent set of cams.

yeah. thats what i rekon to. im making atm 307 awkw on a t04z on 20 pound.

to be honest id expect more. but a stock as a rock motor just with the nesasery suport mods. im guessing yeah cams etc etc.

yeah. thats what i rekon to. im making atm 307 awkw on a t04z on 20 pound.

to be honest id expect more. but a stock as a rock motor just with the nesasery suport mods. im guessing yeah cams etc etc.

A LOT of people with the usual gear are getting 370-420rwkw on PULP without even going to Meth :P

Thats just the usual mods and around 23-25psi or there abouts.

I reckon you have a good number of things to look at if a t04z is only making 300rwkw on 20psi. Its a good 50-70rwkw down on what it should be

I run the 0.81 AR T04Z with a built 2.7 engine, cams, 4in exhaust, HKS manifold and i make 450kw on 24psi, thats nearly 1.8 bar. and BTW how does the stocker engine respond to a monster turbo like the T04Z. and how do you keep the old girl alive, dont you have issues with blowby due to older piston rings??

if i hijack this topic my apoligies

well morgs and pretty much everyone else has cams at the least. and a built motor with forgies so abit of timing could help.

my motor is still going strong. 170pound across all 6. (apart fron some cool oil leaks lol.

i put it down to oil and oil temp. and a concervative tune. tuners get a litle scared when they find out its a 230k old donk hehe.

so penrite syn 5 or syn 10. two 25 row oil coolers and overfilled oil by 1 litre. (up to the hump on the stick) to stop oil surge.

I must say is there much variance between the garret and hks versions in overall powerout put nismoid

Not to the tune of 70rwkw i dont believe so.

A few GTR's have been using Garrett t04z's here for a while and those are what im going off.

Not the HKS versions

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...