Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, i'm wondering if an offset of +35 will work on a GTR32. I dont really care how they look, im just concerned about how they perform on the track. And wot rim width is the best fit for 235/45/17 and 255/40/17 tyres? Will the performance of a GTR will affected in a negative way on the track with mismatched tyres front n rear, say 235/45/17 front and 255/40/17 rear? Any input will be greatly appreciated.

Cheers, Jyo.

Hi all, i'm wondering if an offset of +35 will work on a GTR32. I dont really care how they look, im just concerned about how they perform on the track. And wot rim width is the best fit for 235/45/17 and 255/40/17 tyres? Will the performance of a GTR will affected in a negative way on the track with mismatched tyres front n rear, say 235/45/17 front and 255/40/17 rear? Any input will be greatly appreciated.

Cheers, Jyo.

ATTESA doesn't like different diameter tyres, wears out the clutch pack something fierce.

GTR's tend to understeer, so using smaller tyres on the front is not a good idea

Over 60% of the weight of a GTR is on the front wheels, so using smaller tyres on the front is not a good idea.

Over 75% of the initial braking effort of a GTR comes from the front brakes, so using smaller tyres on the front is not a good idea.

:no: cheers :down:

why you would go to rims narrower than the ones the car was made with standard is beyond me. plenty of people are giving you advice, but you don't seem to want it?

I'll say it loud:

just buy the right/suitable wheels for your car!! do not stuff around with the wrong size/offset and spacers etc. it's a waste of time when you have the opportunity to save that hassle and just buy the correct fkn wheels straight up

standard wheels are 16X8 +30 so going to 17X7.5 is a dumb idea. no doubt about it. going to 17X9 +20 is a good idea. even 17X9+30 is a good idea. 17X8 +35 is NOT a good idea. yes it will work. your call will still roll along but you are going backwards from what your car had from the factory.

but the rims are narrower than stock. and 1.5 inches narrower than the most common 32 size (17X9). so yeah they will give more track than a stock rim but I don't understand why you'd want a narrower rim? yes a 0 offset will give more track than say a +20 offset (comparing rims of the same width) but putting a 235 on a 7.5 is not what I'd reccomend. I'd use a 235 on a 9 inch rim. sorry if I seem a little blunt but it seems to me like you are trying to re-invent the wheel for no good reason? (pun intended).

Yeah i get it, i was just thinking that +0 offset would give a wider track width? Think i got it wrong the other way..

what!! lol. vip stylzzzz. if you can find somwhere that pumpes guards to fit them let me know kaythanx :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...