Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well I have had the PFC in for a couple of weeks now and am about to decide on where to get it tuned (I'm in WA). I have narrowed down the tuner to either Top Racing (it's close to where I live and it's a small tuning place which I guess might mean I will get a more personalised service from?) or X-Speed (which is a big tuning place that might have better facilities, but might be be a more get you in and get you out experience?).

What do people think I should go for?

Also I am only aiming for around 200rwkw at the moment (I have turbo back exhaust, EBC which will be running 11psi etc...) - obvioulsy my injectors are getting to 100% duty cycle and I should not need much more at around that power level, but would it be wise to upgrade my fuel pump or get an adjustable fuel regulator before the tune for safety? Would the adjustable fuel regulator allow me to squeeze a tiny bit more performance out of this setup? I don't care about the cost of the items but would it cost much to get either of these installed by a mechanic, ie is it a major job?

Any help is GREATLY appreciated :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160213-tuning-an-pfc-for-my-r34-gtt/
Share on other sites

I just road tuned a mates r33 gtst after he just got his new PFC last weekend and it goes really well.. i am estimating around 195rwkw or so on 13psi which spikes to 14psi when its really cold.

the mods are

Front mount

Full turbo back exhaust

K&N panel filter

Apexi POWER FC

and some duel stage boost controller

stock injectors

stock fuel pump

I dont think it would have less then 195rwkw it goes great - should put it on the dyno soon to check i suppose

ohhh forgot to mention it gets up to 90% injector duty with stock injectors and stock pump.

Edited by Guilt-Toy
I just road tuned a mates r33 gtst after he just got his new PFC last weekend and it goes really well.. i am estimating around 195rwkw or so on 13psi which spikes to 14psi when its really cold.

the mods are

Front mount

Full turbo back exhaust

K&N panel filter

Apexi POWER FC

and some duel stage boost controller

stock injectors

stock fuel pump

I dont think it would have less then 195rwkw it goes great - should put it on the dyno soon to check i suppose

ohhh forgot to mention it gets up to 90% injector duty with stock injectors and stock pump.

So I guess I shouldn't need to worry about getting an adjustable fuel reg... It's just that I have already been seeing the injectors at 100% duty cycle on the PFC hand controller. Maybe this is just because it has not been properly tuned yet to make the most of the fuel being squited into the engine?

exactly. when i was doing this one - the stock maps was taking the tune down to 10 af ratios which is very very rich map standard so they will take fuel out of it and it will bring the mixture right which will also make more power.

So yeah the stock pfc map is set really trich - you need to get it cleaned up.

how big are the 34 gtt injectors? if they are the same as the r33 then 200rkw should be fine.

So I guess I shouldn't need to worry about getting an adjustable fuel reg... It's just that I have already been seeing the injectors at 100% duty cycle on the PFC hand controller. Maybe this is just because it has not been properly tuned yet to make the most of the fuel being squited into the engine?
Edited by Guilt-Toy
Cool...

So those with knowledge of WA tuners - should I go with Top Racing in Carlisle, or X-Speed??? :glare:

Between the 2 i'd go with X-Speed, get Ant there to tune it, speak to anyone in WA who's into performance tuning n Ant will be mentioned sumwhere. How much did either place quote u for the tune?

Expect round 195rwkw, dont be afraid to lean it out to extract more power & economy but watch the knocks. Noticed ur in Vic Pk, wonder if ive seen u round...

Between the 2 i'd go with X-Speed, get Ant there to tune it, speak to anyone in WA who's into performance tuning n Ant will be mentioned sumwhere. How much did either place quote u for the tune?

Expect round 195rwkw, dont be afraid to lean it out to extract more power & economy but watch the knocks. Noticed ur in Vic Pk, wonder if ive seen u round...

Yep you probably have seen me around Vic Park - it's a silver 4 door R34 :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...