Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey hey, i had a pfc boost controller hooked up in my old car but when i sold it i didnt remove all the parts for it. i have the thing that you plug the lines into but not the solenoid i think it is.

i'll get some pics of what i have in the morning, but i wanted to know is it possible to buy just that part that im missing or am i up for a whole new set?

also while ive got you here, my car was running fine untill a couple of days ago when i started to get heaps of knock, like jumping into the 90's at times. its fine if im just driving around normally but as soon as i give it a hit i get heaps of knocking. i thought maybe bad fuel but if refilled the tank since and same thing happening. nothing has changed in the car at all and ive had to wind down the boost to try stop some of the kock, was running 15psi and wound it back to 12ish. whats the go with that? spark plugs?

anyway thanks for reading my longest post ever :laugh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160317-pfc-boost-comtroller-parts/
Share on other sites

fiddlying around with the thing today, and i took it out with no air filter at all on it and knock was basically gone, only went to around 20. then i put my old pod on which is less restrictive and i had heaps less knock than with the apexi one ive got.

is it possible that the rubber tube running from the afm to the turbo is sucking shut, more so when i have a more restrictive intake? would this cause more kock?

when you took it out with no filter did you turn the boost back up to 15psi ?

the intake pipes standard have been known to suck in its a common problem

fiddlying around with the thing today, and i took it out with no air filter at all on it and knock was basically gone, only went to around 20. then i put my old pod on which is less restrictive and i had heaps less knock than with the apexi one ive got.

is it possible that the rubber tube running from the afm to the turbo is sucking shut, more so when i have a more restrictive intake? would this cause more kock?

i wouldnt run 15psi on a standard turbo either. but whats making me think maybe thats whats happening is the more restrictive the air filter is the more kock im getting, and i saw in the pod vs airbox thread that with the airbox being more restrictive it was sucking the pipe closed.

  • 2 months later...

well the car has been sitting in the drive way since april due to an unexpected trip to court (apparently speeding deserves more of a penalty than drink driving, stupid f**kers seriously but anyway) and i been thinking about the pinging how it just started happening.

maybe fuel filter is getting clogged? would that do it? or would that just make the fuel pump work harder.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • Yuh, but that one is NLA. There might be an equivalent, but I haven't looked.
    • If you hadn't bought a stand alone one already, nismo make a bolt on adjustable FPR https://www.efisolutions.com.au/nismo-fuel-pressure-regulator-sr-rb-s13-180sx-r32
    • I know and understand they are principally the same. They both cause lock under decel, but the 1.5 nomenclature implies "half" or less locking force, or it allows for more slip or a speed differential between both wheels. Right now the driving manners with the 2 way is pretty rough on transient to full off throttle in the backroads. In other words letting off the throttle too rough is not forgiving, great for drifting, tougher for controlled grip driving.      Yeah, I have watched that video a couple times, I am more so just looking for the confirmation that both part numbers offer the same ramp architecture and are just different settings from the factory.     38420-RSS15-B5  38420-RSS20-B5
×
×
  • Create New...