Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

just wondering from a few of you with a bit of experience with drag racing in skylines, what would 50rwkw be worth in an r32 gtst??

I had a r32 a few yrs back which made 125rwkw (i dont care how low you think this figure is) and ran a 14.1 with a slightly slipping clutch.

Ive just had my car tuned and was told it made approx 175rwkw on the same dyno. Now the dyno is known to read up to in one case 40rwkw low, so i cant trust reading other ppls power figures to time run. With a decent run and the fact i have a very good clutch now rather than when i had a stocko on the original car what time do you think it would run realistically?

Thanks for your help.....Brett

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160577-whats-50rwkw-worth-down-the-strip/
Share on other sites

to get a 14.1 with 125 kw is pretty impressive, maybe too empressive. did you get it dyno'd at the same place? i have 169 rwkw and with street tyres i have a 13.7 and i have been told that is good. 14.1 is a good time for a skyline, so with the right driving you probably get low 13's

I think one of the guys in a R32 GTST(RB25turbo) with around 180-190rwkw did a 13.6 pass.

well there is only one way to find out go down to the strip and see what it can do,

you can never trust dyno figures its a tool for tuning :(

You need to mention trap speeds. ET varys on power deliver and traction.

For example, I ran 13.3 with 215rwkw. Sounds about normal depending on what type of car and weight. But I did it at 114mph. So initially you could think that that was about right maybe a bit slow. Then when you mention the MPH you can see that there is power there but it hasn't been used efficiently.

to add further i ran a 13.4 with a trap speed of 103.5mph, the 10mph difference but only 0.1 sec slower. his car is more powerful showing greater speed but mine was a tidier run, more effective use of power. could be slipping clutch, wheel spin, poor launch, slow gear change, missed gear, bad tune.

Chris Davey: Is that 215rwkw in a Corona or R32 R33 GTS?..

Bretto:

When you do your run as Nismo_God has said; 60ft, Trap Speed & ET are all important factors to consider when judging your power.

have fun! >_<

thanks for the reply's ppl.

firstly yes it was at the same shop.

gt shortie i agree, thats why i asked, not sure if i wanna run it for fear of breaking something :ermm:

it was just under 100mph, but it was yrs ago, but i remember that. like i said the dyno is known for reading very low power figures. thats why im not worried about the 125rwkw (on that note, he had a stock standard r32 gtst on the dyno and it made 80rwkw, that should give u an idea of how low the dyno reads). after reading the rb25 turbo upgrade post on here and seeing some power figures some ppl are making with dyno graphs it makes me laugh.

Edited by bretto
  • 2 weeks later...

I can't see you breaking much with 175rwkw. Take it down and let us know how you go.

To add to the thread. How much difference do people think 50rwkw will make at higher power levels?

GTShortie I think got a 12.7 or 12.6 last sunday and I got a 12.4. I think he has about 50rwkw less than me but probably a lighter car. Mine is 1580 with me and a full tank.

The lower the initial power (ie 125rwkw) the more difference the extra 50rwkw will make.

ie; The improvement in time from 125-175rwkw (maybe 0.5-0.7sec) than you will if you go from say 700-750kw (maybe 0.1 or 0.2sec).

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

As someone mentioned you cant say 50rwkw equals x amount of tenths of the time as it depends on the initial power the 50rwkw was added to.

A 50kw increase on a 500kw car is a power gain of 10%. Whereas in your case the 50kw going from 125 to 175kw is a 40% power gain.

And you cant compare to other peoples results as you mention the dyno you went on is a little out of whack.

Which leaves only one way to find out.....

burnsie - as was stated the mph will be a true indication to power - your 13.9 was a very clean run, everything worked well.

my car just with the cat back did a 14.5 @ 95 with a 1.9 so around the 140-150rwkw

Chris - that 114mph is good for mid to high 12's!!!

  • 1 month later...

found this thread and have some more to add...

i ran a 13.426 with 1.970 60ft at 103.5mph with 169rwkw

now i rana 13.081 with 1.911 60 at 104.25 with say around 206(boost was higher then previously dyno'd)

so with an extra 35-40kw i made up 0.35 of a second....and not even 1 mph faster....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...