Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

OK Jack has just helped me tow my car to another panel beater. Things seem much more optimistic now.

I definitely want to fix it assuming it can be done for the amount i want it done for. The radiator support panel is probably repairable. the rest depends on how much parts cost.

I definitely need:

- 2 headlights

- Bonnet

I may need:

- Front bar + grill

- LHF guard

- Radiator

- A/C condenser + piping

- Radiator support panel

Please PM if you have any of this stuff around

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by MaXiMuS007

OK Jack has just helped me tow my car to another panel beater. Things seem much more optimistic now.

I definitely want to fix it assuming it can be done for the amount i want it done for. The radiator support panel is probably repairable. the rest depends on how much parts cost.

I definitely need:

- 2 headlights

- Bonnet

I may need:

- Front bar + grill

- LHF guard

- Radiator

- A/C condenser + piping

- Radiator support panel

Please PM if you have any of this stuff around

man skyline33 can get u all those spare parts for preety cheap, just came back from his mates workshop and they got shit loads of skyline engines and body parts!

Max dude, sue the frigging compliance engineer. If you can prove that the car was complianced with the dodgy bumper (ie. you didn't put it on yourself), I think this is definitely a case of negligence - the complaince engineer has breached his duty of care by signing off a car that did not pass ADR. The consequence was clearly foreseeable. However, you may not be able to recover full cost due to contributory negligence on your behalf, since you caused the accident.

Whatever happens, good luck dude.

Thanks Henros, I was thinking along the same lines, i.e. contributory negligence, as clearly the damage would not have been as great had the bumper support been attached properly.

The relevant statute for motor vehicles is the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 but in it it refers to the ADR's which I couldn't find online. I wanted to get copies of the relevant ADR's before I got too carried away.

I did not put the bumper on, thats how it came to the country and thats how it was complianced. Clearly the duty of care for the engineer exists and it was breached. Although I knew that the front bar was aftermarket, I did not know of the changes to the vehicle's structure that facilitated its installation or its inadequacy for Australian regulations as I do now.

Would buying an imported car come under the Goods Act? Could this be considered "a good of unmerchantable quality"?. It is reasonable that I relied on the skills of the compliancing engineer to assure the structural stability of the vehicle. And surely it is not reasonable that during my inspection of the vehicle that I remove the bumper bar to inspect whats underneath is it? Thus it is considered a hidden defect. Two of the four tests for goods of a merchantable quality fail. Here the importer is considered the manufacturer, however it was not his fault as he wouldn't have known the changes to the underlying chassis, so maybe this doesn't apply then.

Should I succeed in some sort of action, however, it would open the "floodgates of litigation" for anyone with an aftermarket front bar who has an accident to claim damages from the installer or manufacturer. Then again, that is precisely the reason why the government has changed to the RAWS scheme, so maybe its justifiable.

It's definitely worth considering.

Does anyone have some definitive legal advice for me? Of course I claim responsibility for the accident itself but the damage is beyond what would have occurred to an ADR compliant vehicle.

mine was a jap front bar, not that thin, not exactly thick, but it did nothing in the collision. The problem is more from the cutting of metal from the supprts than the bumper itself.

have a look at photo no. 7 again, see the 2 rectangular cut outs in the metal? Then notice that the major bending in the bar happened at those points. Not a coincidence. In fact, the bars bent upwards at the cuts!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
    • Great weekend and event. Open fire at the caravan park, perfect weather all day and a great feed and a couple of drinks at at awesome country pub.
    • Waaay ahead of ya....(evil laugh!!) Will show the fitment and spec details later when it isnt as rainy !
×
×
  • Create New...