Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I reckon all boxer engines sound similar. Porsches sound more like VW's than WRX's do though.

I'm not sure why the sounds are different, but with a boxer 4 and a v-twin (motorcycle) you get more of a pulse because each half of the engine fires at once. I don't know how that applies to boxer 6 engines because I would have thought the extra set of pistons would interrupt the pulse wave of the other 2.

That also doesn't really explain V8's, which have even more cylinders to interfere with the "pulse" sound, and yet they still sound very "pulsy".

Also, 180 degree parallel twin engines (motorcycles again) sound fairly "smooth" like an inline 4, but a 270 degree parallel twin sounds like a v-twin which also has a 270 degree firing pattern.

thatz coz its a box, and boxes make weird noises?? :confused:

tiny little engine it is, but impressive for little engine, the boxster 2L engine it is..

its like so mini compared to a boxes..to me it doesn't make heaps of power compared to the sky, but in that space it is efficient for power compared to the outside universe.

Subaru (WRX, Forester, Liberty) and VW (Beetle, Kombi, Type 3) engines are the same basic layout and like two40 says have a different firing order to an inline 4. This is why they sound similar if you listen to exhaust noise and not mechanical noise. The VW is extra noisy because it's air cooled and does not benefit from the noise reducing properties of a liquid cooled engine.

Porsche went to a great deal of trouble on the 996 engine (1st production water cooled boxer 6 for them) to retain the "air cooled" sound.

I follow all that, they have a different firing order etc., but they still fire one cylinder per 180 degrees (four cyl four stroke) of crankshaft revolution, just like an inline four, but they sound distinctly different. I cant figure out why, and I haven't heard a satisfactory explanation. For instance, if you changed the camshafts on an inline four to give a different firing order the car (or bike) would sound the same. In fact I believe early Kawasakis had different firing order (1,4,2,3) from Honda (1,4,3,2) but sounded pretty much the same. If it's doing 1000 rpm then it's firing 1000 times a minute at 1/1000 minute intervals regardless of its firing order or configuration. So why does it sound different?

Originally posted by two40

I've never heard a WRX that sounds like a VW.  

VW's sound the way they do because they have a metal chain.

WRX's sound the way they do because like you said, it's a flat four. Crap layout if you ask me. I'll let someone who knows more about it explain.

Don't make me bust out my alfa and show you otherwise Porgie!!

also on JimX,s point, why is it that the more cylinders you have, the smoother the engine (or exhaust note) gets, except for V8's.

For example, a 12 sounds smoother than a 10, which sounds smoother than a 8 which DOESN't sound smoother than a 6 or a 4.

It's a bit hard to compare i guess, cause most people, when they think V8, think of GM/Ford V8's, whereas most 10's and 12's are made by prestige marques. I guess we need to compare a Ferrari V8 to a Ferrari V12 to check properly...anyone care to indulge me? :D

Belly_up, I think a lot has to do with the firing order. The GM Gen III sounds a lot smoother than the previous Holden engine, and the only fundamental difference is the firing order. I think they changed it to smooth out the idle. You can get some of the sound back with a decent exhaust (most I've heard are crap) but it still doesn't sound as rumbly as the old Holden V8's or even the current Ford V8's.

That said, even a "rough" sounding V8 is still quite smooth in a driving sense.

Originally posted by Belly_up

also on JimX,s point, why is it that the more cylinders you have, the smoother the engine (or exhaust note) gets, except for V8's.

cause no one wants a smooth 8. they want a grumpy 8 with a huge cam and blap blap blap idle. muahahaha

ahem, i'll just go to my corner now.:uhh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah I suspect even if you hold airmass per cycle/cylinder constant if you get too far away from stock you're still going to have problems running the factory tune within the bounds of the factory load scale. Cams, different displacement/rod ratio, etc. I'm just lucky that the GTIII-SS with wastegate boost + CA compliance cats is pretty much equivalent to stock turbos. When I have actual space I can finally get it tuned and modify the fuel system for flex fuel to 100% handle any detonation concerns when cranking the boost to whatever those dinky turbos can put out.
    • I would say no, why, because my daughter, who also lives in Goulburn, hasn't recommended us going there Pity, as we miss all the German joints around in Sydney, actually, the restaurants are the only thing I really miss about Sydney, and a special mention to Ishibanboshi at Bondi Junction, their Kara-age Don is heart cloggingly deliciousness (always added a special boiled egg...or 2) 😋 
    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around without a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
    • Yep, this bit another local owner. I caught it before putting the transmission back into the car, what I noticed was the pressure plate fingers weren't flat and even. It's more obvious with the pull style clutch because the throwout bearing ring was visibly not flat once everything is put together. Nismo should really update their instructions to call out this specific detail. I'm not even sure the clutch as-shipped orients everything properly.
×
×
  • Create New...