Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well guys... I know this is a hard question... but someone had to ask it...

Well, here it is.... in your personal opinion, and only based on looks... which is your favourite and why (please provide at least 3 reasons).??

I'll start....

My favourite is a R33 - nice... IMO, the R32 is way too old and boxy looking, the R34 too bulky and boxy looking, the R35 too fat space-shipey...whereas the R33 is class.... nice curves, elegant looking and really has a timeless look to it... put a nice kit and some mods on a R33 - lookwise, it is king of the road no doubt.....

Thanks guys.... this is just for a discussion, no meant to offend anyone and their beasts... all Skylines are great!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162403-which-skyline-looks-best/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You kidding right?

The 33 has to be the ugliest skyline they ever released!

No offence to the 33 owners

but IMO the 32 (GTR) 34 GTT and GTR have to be the sexiest machines on the rd.. The styling and body shapes are awesome .. the 34 is a little on the short side however makes up for it in power and shape... the r32 has an awesome ass end and the front isnt too bad either... each to there own but I would put the 32 GTR as sexiest on ever made.. its close tho

If I had to pick a SAU member .. Turko I think is name is .. his 32 GTR is "off tap" is the only way to discribe it!

The v35 IMO will never be a real skyline .. its a cruiser nothing more.. for the older man .. more refined 350z cross maxima look, sexi as tho!

You kidding right?

The 33 has to be the ugliest skyline they ever released!

No offence to the 33 owners

but IMO the 32 (GTR) 34 GTT and GTR have to be the sexiest machines on the rd.. The styling and body shapes are awesome .. the 34 is a little on the short side however makes up for it in power and shape... the r32 has an awesome ass end and the front isnt too bad either... each to there own but I would put the 32 GTR as sexiest on ever made.. its close tho

If I had to pick a SAU member .. Turko I think is name is .. his 32 GTR is "off tap" is the only way to discribe it!

The v35 IMO will never be a real skyline .. its a cruiser nothing more.. for the older man .. more refined 350z cross maxima look, sexi as tho!

oh come on....saying R33 is the ugliest skyline ever is offensive evenn if you didn't mean offense.....its just like saying your car is the ugliest piece of shit ever then saying no offence, but you are going to be offended regardless, even if you don't say anything.

Another uselss thread that's gonna end up in arguments about random things.

funny how this thread is concentrating on only 4 generations of skylines.

you are aware that the 32 was the 8th generation arent you?

hakosuka1.jpg

i like those ones.

but from the models you listed, 32 and 34.

the 33 really isnt my cup of tea, but i wouldnt say its ugly.

Come on guys, I really want this thread to be an informative one...

I mean, lets share our pasions for our skylines... ok, so so far, two people have said R32... and one (which is me) believes in the R33 - ok, let's go on.... pictures would be nice too!

Thanks all

R32 / R34 are both winners in my eyes.

They seem to be built from the same sporting heritage and sport very similar styling cues. I still love the R33 too but it's very plain jane when pitted against the other two.

The 34 is indeed bulky, but when coupled with some fat rims & rubber it looks really tough and menacing on the road. Plus I guess there's also the rarity factor. At the moment there are R33's aplenty on the roads compared to R32's and R34's (well at least in my part of Sydney) and I'm sure that decreases their 'wow factor'.

:happy:

Just my 2c

(I'm a 34 GTT driver btw eheh)

These threads are no longer informative..they have been done over n over to death and it all ends up in shit!

Its like creating a thread and asking....who's wife do you think looks the best in terms of looks, yours, mine or Dans?? :D

Do a search.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
×
×
  • Create New...