Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It was mentioned before that it's worth getting only if your using slicks because with road tyres you don't generate the forces to cause oil starvation.

It was from another thread, not sure which one though. Ie. I'm too lazy to do the seach... :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16273-baffled-sumps/#findComment-333472
Share on other sites

yep it's dead easy to baffle ur sum. also there are may other way to do it with filler elements, but yes, ppls say they haven't blown anything up, next time they hear a knock from deep inside, u know that the big end bearings.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16273-baffled-sumps/#findComment-333632
Share on other sites

Hi GTS-t VSPEC, we extend the sump width (not depth as it is already too low). The extensions each hold 1.0 to 1.5 litres of oil when full. This is an old, tried and proven layout, simple and effective

We then put one way doors into the extensions from the sump such that the doors open from the wings inwards. This stops the oil in the sump pushing the door open, only oil in the wings trying ot get inot the sump can push the doors open.

So the doors stay closed when centrifical force is trying to push the oil from the sump into the outside wing. The oil flows from the inside wing into the sump under the same centrifical force. This makes sure that you always have the sump full, thus no oil surge.

This is much harder to explain in words, compared to a drawing, but I hope it makes sense anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16273-baffled-sumps/#findComment-335440
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Sydneykid

Hi Guys, I'm just in the processes of fabricating one for the new RB31DET, I'll post some pictures when it's done.  If you finish yours first, I'd like a look.

Sydneykid, are you going to make a few of these? Or is that just a once off thing?

It sounds like a good idea.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16273-baffled-sumps/#findComment-337340
Share on other sites

Hi ed, we are currently doing 5 X RB31 bottom ends and I think 3 of them are getting winged sumps. So another couple will give the fabricator a bit of a run (I fibbed before, I'm not actually doing the cutting and welding, he is, I just do the design and measure). Cost in mild steel would be around $400'ish if you want to join in, you supply the standard sump. I'll confirm the price in a couple of days if you want something more exact.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16273-baffled-sumps/#findComment-337371
Share on other sites

Hi GTS-t VSPEC, we have ground clearance issues, even without making the sump deeper. Plus you have to extend the pick up which can be tricky and dangerous. Sticking a baffle around the pickup is OK as long as you put one way doors in it as well. But it doesn't increase the capacity of the sump. Which is really an issue in RB engines as at big RPM they carry a lot of oil up high, around the camshafts and valves, not in the sump.

Oil pumps are a bit of a pain. I would like to run a higher flow but standard pressure pump, but they aren't available. They are all higher pressure, some have higher flow as well . Plus the prices make my nose bleed. So I just use the standard R33 GTR pump, with an adaptor ring if it's an RB30 or R32 GTR crank. Never had problem, even with oil coolers and remote filters which put extra load on the pump.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16273-baffled-sumps/#findComment-337537
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...