Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I did the whole set up step of the knocking levels, was getting about 80 at 1,600rpm & 92-100 at 3,500rpm (in set up screen - not monitor)

so then I put it in monitor mode and it says around 4 while idling but then drops to 0 whenever the throttle is open..

I set it up once the car was warm & took it for a drive once the car was also warm & that's the reading I got..

(I've got an R34 with 35,000kms on the clock)

Ideas as to why it drops to 0?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/163747-safc-2-knock-level/
Share on other sites

i just bought an safc2 myself (havent installed it yet)

but as i understand it - you are meant to subtract the "stock" knock figures from the "tune" knock figures... no?

since it's a microphone you'd get knock anyway - but since the "stock" knock figures are normal, you would ultimately make that zero?

what the ?

the knock display on the powerfc is bar chart and digital counter output which goes up as the knock is larger

ie: knock 0 means no knocking. knock 40 is mild, knock 60 is warning, knock 100 is bad etc etc..

normal driving should be 0 or very very low

what the ?

the knock display on the powerfc is bar chart and digital counter output which goes up as the knock is larger

ie: knock 0 means no knocking. knock 40 is mild, knock 60 is warning, knock 100 is bad etc etc..

normal driving should be 0 or very very low

yes, but who sets normal driving = 0 knock? certainly each car has a different "normal"

Ugh, I tried resetting the knock sensor information and I'm still getting the same problem! :(

In the setup screen it's on about 63ish at 1,400rpm and 80-90ish at 3,400rpm yet when I take it to the monitor mode I still get 2,3,4 displaying in neutral with the throttle closed but as soon as I put my foot down a little it just jumps to 0..

I'm doing all this while the car is completely warmed up - oil temp wise.

this is normal.. it has to do with how the SAFC interpolates knock values.. you will often find that after a long driving session (where your knock might have been say 10-15, you will come to rest in neutral and the knock will jump up 8-10 while idling. dont worry about it.

but I'm not getting any knock reading while driving..that's my problem..?

I did a bit more of an investigation:

0 Knock readout in Drive at all times

1-4 when in Park or Neutral

WTF?!

Edited by so_tred

bump, I really want to figure this out..

The 34 has 2 knock sensors coming in/going out of the ECU, could it be that the other knock sensor might somehow respond differently? I really don't want to go pulling things apart again though unless its for sure that's what it is.

I just found this on another message board:

"I was wondering what other peoples knock readings were. WHile at idle, my knock reading goes anywhere from 2 to 16. When I give any throttle at all, the knock reading goes to 0 and stays there."

Reply: "I think at idle your picking up valvetrain noise and other noises.. Low idle you can hear rattles and other noises that you normally wouldn't associate with engine knock.

Even at low RPM its possible to pick up noise.. The truth is that knock sensitivity needs to be fairly numb at low RPM especially at idle, and progressively more sensitive at mid-upper RPM's where you'd typically produce the peaks of boost and up from there.."

Sound about right?

But why does everyone elses here not behave like mine & this guys..

Edited by so_tred

i have no idea how the safc figures out its knocking levels but the powerfc does exhibit any of this behaviour

you dont need to calibrate the pfc knock sensor and it just works out the box.

you get knock display which increases as detonation occurs, via the factory knock sensors

the higher the voltage from the sensor, the higher the value of knock

Michael gets high figures like (80-200) in his RB20 if he floors it onto the freeway. Not too good :(

I leave my car in the sun alot and it's always knocking when I start the car in summer :rofl: Runs like crap in the heat... of course I think my coilpacks might be fried which doesn't help :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...