Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

From : Lorain McElligott <[email protected]>

Sent : Thursday, 19 April 2007 6:09:30 PM

To : Random email Im not putting [email protected]

Subject : From Loraine 19 Apr 07

Hi XXXXXXX,

Thank you for your email and advising me that I am under surveillance by local car clubs.

Regards my personal information - it has been published to the web back since Dec last year.

If anyone wants to talk to me then thats fine or they can email me as you have done or take part in the forums on our site.

Being recorded on video is part of everyday life these days. It is a shame that I am not a bit more photogenic otherwise I would have no complaints. In the interim, I suppose it is something that i just have to learn to live with. It seems to be part of modern life.

The objective of Roadside Watch is to try and reduce the number of people who are maimed and killed on the roads.

It is only those who deliberately break the law or endanger the lives of others that have anything to worry about from Roadside Watch. Our focus is on anyone who drives dangerously - regardless of the car that they drive and regardless of age!

In some cases, this maybe a granny hoon who fails to look properly when reversing, or a yuppie hoon or anyone else using a hand-held mobile phone while driving or a mummy hoon who is too busy worrying about the kids in the back seat to attend to the road.

Surely it is not right to deliberately endanger the lives of others for whatever reason.

But perhaps I have got it wrong. Let me know what you think.

Loraine.

BTW We are actually in support of Car Clubs. We think that a lot of their members do a a very valuable job in providing events and venues for car enthusiasts. We see them as being an important part of the solution.

Roadside Watch

PO Box 111

Cotton Tree 4558

An email I have seen in reply to something sent to her over the dead shit job on seek.

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

is she that stupid?

One of the egyptian pharo's (I just murdered the history book with spelling mistakes) was killed hooning his charriot around.

As long as man has powered transport he will want to go as fast as he can. Its fun, it gets the blood pumping and it wakes you up and makes you feel alive. Thats never going to change, society is never going to reach some enlightened height where we can all live our lives without the adrenilin rush and wake up to "diddly bop ho son, the nancies won the cricket, i do say chap isnt that wounderful" so dob in a stupid bitch on a crusade.

Worst Website Ever.

/tired rant ovah

these guys are really going to be bias anyway, if a granny stops in the middle of the road and does a dangerous parking manouver and indangers lives, do u think they will pass that on to the cops, i dont think so, the cops dont care about stuff like that, they want ppl speeding, skiding, racing, something that will hold up in court. so while they claim this site is for "hoons" of all types, that is just to cover there arses, so they dont look like they are picking on one particular road user group.

such a wank.

go do something comstructive like help ice addicts, im sure they are causing more ruckus than so called "hoons"

Ridiculous anyhow.. It's the cops job to enforce that, not members of the public.

If these people think there is inadequate numbers of police enforcing the road rules, then they should be campaigning to have more police enforcing the road rules. Not taking things into their own hands, as it will result in them getting physically attacked eventually, and putting their own lives at risk.

All for what is a minor issue anyhow - the road toll is actually a fairly minor problem in our society, and has come down from massive numbers pre-80's to something that will always be fairly static. People (like these idiots) just need to accept this and stop believing the rhetoric on ACA, TT, the tabloids, etc which is targeted towards morons, and which makes things out as 'out of control'.

After some thinking, I've decided to post an email I received back from Loraine in reply to some concerns I put forward to her.

Hi Joshua,

Thanks for your thoughts on everything.

We need to do a much better job in terms of letting people know that we are absolutely definately focused on anyone endangering the lives of others on our roads.

I spent some time in Feb this year attempting to film a road safety promo for Roadside Watch. It was called 'granny hoon'. I think if we had been successful in filming it and getting it out there on the media, there would have been no problems regards exactly where we are coming from. ie our focus is very much on road safety across the board. Unfortunately, we were not able to complete it ourselves although we did have a whole heap of really fantastic young people giving us a hand.

At the moment, we trying to turn the script into a video making competition and are looking for a sponsor to donate some really nice prizes. When we get that lined up, we will be in a position to go ahead. A lot of our progress has been stalled by the amount of time and energy we have had to put into getting the web-site functional. It has been a real problem.

We have very limited resouses and sometimes we dont get to where we want or even need to go, nearly as quickly as we would like.

We have taken on board what you have said about the perception of most car clubs and enthusiasts. We really need to somehow correct this, because I can understand the anger when the people who are trying to do the right thing on the roads but do drive a 'hot' looking vehicle get pulled over for nothing. We have had a lot of reports of this to our website.

We need time to have a look at the whole thing and work out what we are doing right and what we are doing wrong. It is wrong that people are pulled over because of the car that they drive or because of their age!

Regarding videoing people under legal age, we have received some legal advise on this, particularly in regards to interviews that we have conducted with young people giving their views, but I cannot give you a proper informed answer at this stage.

We do not wish to harm people in any way or destroy their lives. We just want people to take thier own driving a bit more seriously and recognize the dangers and risks to others that do arise, sometimes via a genuine accident and sometime as a result of plain stupidity ie driving drunk.

I will try and get back to you regarding the 'underage' issue, but I think that if a driver is licenced or unlicenced and on the road and driving dangerously, it is in the public interest for people to know regardles of their age.

Roadside Watch is much more focussed on vidoeing vehicles, and re3cording number plates rather than drivers. The owner of the vehicle is responsible for the vehicle, and in many states and must take responsibility.

Thanks once again for your feedback. We will try to do a better job getting our message out there. Just give us a little bit more time. We are working on it.

Regards Loraine

Really their time could be better used to reduce the suicide rate. Im sure thats much higher than the road toll.

Or getting people to exercise, as im sure the number of obesity related deaths is much higher. Car crashes are just so much more spectacular though.

Just did a drive by of L. McElligott's house, and what do I see? A lifted Hilux with clear tail lights, polished bars and 4 HUGE spot lights on the roof...

Rego TANGO dark blue/purple in colour

Do i hear a emissions report to qld transport :P

I almost signedup to give them a peice of my mind. But CBF. what a joke they are.

why dont they sit out the front of the cop shop. and video the cops doin burnouts as they are leavin. or video tape the thousands of morons who race up the lane thats ending on the M1 just to make it up a few more cars. which helps causes this gay peak hour traffic we are experiencing.

bah. lamers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...