Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey as a few people may no i turboed my na in january, its been in and out of the tunners just fiddling with it,

Anyways the car has been running really well but for a little while it was running really rich so today i though i would check and re-gap my plugs and do a compression test,

1= 140 2=130 3=140 4=140 5=150 6=160, i though that was pretty normal no probs there the second cylender the spark plug gay was a little out i dont know if that could have done anything to make the comp a little lower but ey its not to bad anyways

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165606-na-t-update/
Share on other sites

i think the 160 was rounded up a little my mate had the gauge, ok well stupid me i was reading around 2 things i may have done wrong, the car wasnt at operating tempreture so i dont know if that changed the restults but its ment to be at opperating tempreture, and when we were doing it we had one of the push in gauges insted of a turn on one and a little bit of air may have escaped we werent being very accurate just wanted to see if anything seemed way out

Edited by unarmed_skyline
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165606-na-t-update/#findComment-3066793
Share on other sites

ok i take that back.. they arent all over the place..

they are decent... although i suspect that they've been rounded off to the nearest 10.

20-25 apart would make me personally unhappy. i'd be aiming for +/- 10.

here's an idea of other peoples:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2851103

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165606-na-t-update/#findComment-3066854
Share on other sites

yeh i think there was a bit of rounding i didnt see the gauge, cars runnings great thou so cant complaine and hey if i blow the rings gives me a reason to rebuild lol, im picking up a daily driver next week so i can afford to have it off the road if something goes wrong

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165606-na-t-update/#findComment-3066864
Share on other sites

Did you change injectors?,I have put a stock turbo on my na also & it runs pretty good as well.All I did was bolt on the standard turbo & intercooler & didn't change the computer or injectors & I think the injector might be to small so I would like to get some new ones before I spend money on a tune/remap etc

Does anyone know what size the stock na injectors are.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165606-na-t-update/#findComment-3082484
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...