Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol dont do that, though it would be hilarious....a better question either would have been....how much boost can i run with 'x' mods, or whats the highest kw the stock injectors can take. your next upgrade is afm and injectors

no i meant 78psi

i say this because PSI is pointless in comparison for this sort of thing. it means absolutely nothing.

PSI is only relevative to the compressor you are using. if he tried to run 14psi on a GT40 then the stock injectors have no hope.

if he tried 14psi on the stock turbocharger then its fine. so 78psi on the stock turbo is probably fine for stock injectors.

it wont flow any useful air past 12psi anyway so the other 66psi is just extra heat and nothing more.

so paulr33... im running 10psi on a GT30R on stock injectors. safe?

depends on the compressor model you are using

the compressor map would give you the true answer to this

but a 30R will flow quiet a lot of air even at 10psi

so you might be on the border line, a dyno plot will give you the answer if you cant find the compressor map info or dont care about the map and reading it

im running a GT3076R with a RB25 turbo's highflowed exhaust side.

84 trim, 0.82 a/r. (i think they the numbers from turbobygarrett.com)

Edited by Pauly33GTS-t

...the correct question is "how much power will stock injectors handle"

jump on some websites of injector makers. they have a calculation applet thing that allows you to put in all your factors and it will rate the injectors for power. rc engineering comes to mind

IF the stock injectors run to 220rwkw as mentioned before, then you can have a t66 turbo on your car, just cap the boost to that power.

get a nismo fuel reg

i would consider changing the pump or hard wire it to 14v (cubes did a howto guide), the wallbro's can be known baddies

what ecu or piggyback are u running? i see no mention of either.

i would suggest stand alone. powerfc is ideal, but pick whatever you like.

either way monitor injector duty and go from there.

stock ecu on those upgrades = bad idea and poor net results

the car will drive like brand new with a complete tune

My local tuner has a few Skylines running around town with 300rwkw with an upgraded fuel pump, rising rate fuel regulator and stock injectors (new turbos and other supporting mods too)... he says when I go to upgrade, I can get 250-260rwkw on a "really safe" tune with a similar setup, but he said the 300 ones aren't running dangerously or anything. This is a tuner that's had several cars feature in HPI (but I don't know how much credibility that magazine gets on here). Because of threads like this, I've been wary, and asked him several times about upgrading the injectors as part of my upgrade plans, and every time he says it isn't needed for my aims (even when I say money isn't a factor in the decision).

paul mate, im running on stock ecu and over the last shit it already seems like a new car...

Im getting hissing and clicking from the injectors tho, me thinks the o-rings have gone on them.

I'll be going Emanage ultimate it seems, as soon as I know for certain someone in adelaide tunes them well.

I would have thought the only real test was an AFR on the dyno?

Any specs on a website will be a guide only.

depending on mods the factory injectors may be fine if they can support a safe AFR at full boost.

Mike

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...