Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

haha wtf.....so i could be taking a snooze in my 1982 honda civic.....on the way to like NSWs or something....and even my excuse for taking a power nap wouldnt save me from being classified as a hoon??? thats just crazy....

hahaha sorry, i forgot to clarify it was the geelong council, title of the article was "COUNCIL TARGETS HOONS" or somthing like that and then when i read the article i freaked out cause it was about people sleeping in their cars around Geelong.

What a fu(king disgrace, it really make my blood boil when losers do stuff like this. Humans think they are just SO much better and deserve so much more than animals. They need to wake up and realize we are animals ourselves and should respect other animals, not inflict pain for fun. Let ME at them with a club and we'll see how much fun it really is. Shame shame shame, I'm Daryn Hinch...Goodnight!

Since when has killing kangaroos been "absolutely illegal"?

I see them chopped up in bits in the supermarket all the time.

Do they just wait for them to die a natural death before serving them to people?

mate im sure the roos you see chopped up in shops weren't beaten to death with a stick. im also sure that when they do kill them they make sure the critters aren't carrying joeys too. thats why its illegal - how these animals died was cruel and needless

Since when has killing kangaroos been "absolutely illegal"?

I see them chopped up in bits in the supermarket all the time.

Do they just wait for them to die a natural death before serving them to people?

Animals being killed humanely for food is one thing, its a completely different story when a wild animal is chased around by a group or morons with a car and then clubbed to death.

Surely you can distinguish between the 2.

Why is everyone here so intent on believing everything the media says?

I can see possible justification here.

If I hit a kangaroo with my car, and it was lying on the ground dying, I wouldn't hesitate to cave its head in.

Sounds fairly humane...... but all you hippies would rather stand there and watch it suffer?

>_<

Perhaps some of you "city folk" should go and try make a living off the land so you can find out first hand how much damage a couple of "innocent" kangaroos can cause to your livelihood.

What you are talking about and what happened in the news article being discussed are 2 completely different things.

These idiots CHASED kangaroos in their car, until they hit one, and then they bashed it to death.

Surely even you can admit how heartless that is.

as a "hippie" im more than happy to put an animal out of its misery if i happen to hit it on the roads.

however its a whole different scenario when said animal is confined in a vacant lot, deliberately chased down, run over and then clubbed (possibly w/o regard to if the thing was actually dying or not), purely for my enjoyment. what would you call me then i wonder sky031?

(by me i mean all those who expressed disgust at this event)

.....again, people go straight back to "what the media says".

I can read what the article says.

I simply choose not to take everything written by the media as gospel.

If it is true, there may be circumstances behind it which haven't been noted, after all, it's a pretty one sided story at the moment.

I can think of plenty of reasons why people would want to chase and kill vermin.

Most people wouldn't hesitate to set a mouse trap, yet I wouldn't consider a mouse trap to be a humane way to eradicate vermin.

They don't make traps for 6 foot tall mice, so people have to find other ways to deal with the pest issue.

.....again, people go straight back to "what the media says".

I can read what the article says.

I simply choose not to take everything written by the media as gospel.

If it is true, there may be circumstances behind it which haven't been noted, after all, it's a pretty one sided story at the moment.

I can think of plenty of reasons why people would want to chase and kill vermin.

Most people wouldn't hesitate to set a mouse trap, yet I wouldn't consider a mouse trap to be a humane way to eradicate vermin.

They don't make traps for 6 foot tall mice, so people have to find other ways to deal with the pest issue.

I totally agree with this.. as cruel as it seems people always are out shooting roo's but clubbing them to death seems really wrong.

I agree with SY031 on this as the media seems to dramatise things soo much and them calling these idiots "HOONS" just doesn't make sense... i thaught hoons were people that drove "hotted up cars" so to speak, man the media sux balls with all their lies... but the media is good for only one thing and thats making people scared not aware.

Why is everyone here so intent on believing everything the media says?

I can see possible justification here.

If I hit a kangaroo with my car, and it was lying on the ground dying, I wouldn't hesitate to cave its head in.

Sounds fairly humane...... but all you hippies would rather stand there and watch it suffer?

:ninja:

Perhaps some of you "city folk" should go and try make a living off the land so you can find out first hand how much damage a couple of "innocent" kangaroos can cause to your livelihood.

nah dude, those idiots chased the kangaroos down and then clubbed it to death. Not the fact that they found the kangaroos dying, and decided to put them out of their misery

If i did see an animal dying - id see if i can take it to the nearest animal shelter - not kill it. Similar to if i see a person collapsed on the foot path - i wouldnt think "hmmm...he/she is dying, why not club him/her to death"....

Perhaps it was not right calling them hoons - but rather plain old dickheads who cant get enough up the ass cause the police are cracking down on their gay activities :)

What you are talking about and what happened in the news article being discussed are 2 completely different things.

These idiots CHASED kangaroos in their car, until they hit one, and then they bashed it to death.

Surely even you can admit how heartless that is.

werd

as a "hippie" im more than happy to put an animal out of its misery if i happen to hit it on the roads.

however its a whole different scenario when said animal is confined in a vacant lot, deliberately chased down, run over and then clubbed (possibly w/o regard to if the thing was actually dying or not), purely for my enjoyment. what would you call me then i wonder sky031?

(by me i mean all those who expressed disgust at this event)

maddness - another hippie on the forums! we should get together and drink that energy drink - "mother" :P

If i did see an animal dying - id see if i can take it to the nearest animal shelter - not kill it.

So.... on one hand you're campaigning for the humane treatment of animals, yet, at the same time, you're saying that you'd prefer to see an animal undergo additional pain and suffering by attempting to transport it instead of doing "the humane thing" and ending it's misery ASAP.

........I suppose you're a fan of Pink as well?

"daaaaaaah I'd rather see sheep die from maggot infestation rather than have them be subjected to mulesing, so don't buy australian wool."

:rolleyes:

So.... on one hand you're campaigning for the humane treatment of animals, yet, at the same time, you're saying that you'd prefer to see an animal undergo additional pain and suffering by attempting to transport it instead of doing "the humane thing" and ending it's misery ASAP.

........I suppose you're a fan of Pink as well?

"daaaaaaah I'd rather see sheep die from maggot infestation rather than have them be subjected to mulesing, so don't buy australian wool."

:P

you gotsta try and help :)

The best thing that one can do is to take it to somewhere like the RSPCA - they'd know what to do. Dont cave its head in by urself, cos if it can be saved, then it can be saved. ya hear me?

Edited by emsta2003
So.... on one hand you're campaigning for the humane treatment of animals, yet, at the same time, you're saying that you'd prefer to see an animal undergo additional pain and suffering by attempting to transport it instead of doing "the humane thing" and ending it's misery ASAP.

Im guessing you have no qualifications or training in Veterinary science, so I hope you have really good judgement on whether an animal has a chance to survive or not before you "end its misery".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...