Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i'm laughing out loud right now....no seriously, really hard. You reckon you can rev your standardish 32 GTR to 10k safely?? I wanna see pics/vids of this....

I apologise to Noel because this does belong in another thread....so mark I challenge you to create one and tell us the mods your car has that allows you to rev to 10k??

lol.. opps meant for the other comment rev to 6500rpm + 2500rpm. or whatever someone said..? lol i never said it reved to 10,000rpm (or did i..?... NO i never said 10k..) thanks matt.. but im sure a IS200 could..?

pics of polished bits noel.. :D

lol i never said it reved to 10,000rpm (or did i..?... NO i never said 10k..)

Sorry, just assumed you could add. I'll attach the quotes for you from the previous page:

7500rpm and dump... IMHO

i still can rev 2500rpm higher than that... :P

Might just be me but 7,500 + 2,500 = 10,000???

thanks matt.. but im sure a IS200 could..?

I doubt it, but unlike you I never claimed it could, did I?

Latest update on build...Tore the bottom end down today. (Thanks for the help Shane) Immaculate. Its a pity to discard some of these bits but! Ordered. and on the way. Eagle rods to replace peened cryod stockers. Jun oil pump, 6 boost himount manifold. Cams. heavier valve springs, Head is going in for solid lifter conversion as soon as the cams and springs arrive.

Cam specs Tomei solids. 260 duration, 9.1 lift.

What started out as a mild street machine has turned in to a monster. Now looking at figures in the 350/400 rwkw range.

Some f**kin wheelchair. :P

no probs old fella, something to do to 'waste' the arvo away :P (i really only do it for the rumbo's ;))

i still reckon it's gonna creep on the 500rwkw figure @~24psi

shit left would be fueling, gate, & bov and thats the main bits catered for! ;)

smy thread so I can say what i like. ;);)

fair enough then lol

So "dry sump" so you can rev the tits off it is normal huh. :P

only a few ways i'll be able to get the rb30 to rev and 1 is dry sump, the other is 2+k of machine work >_<

well nengun has these 2

http://www.nengun.com/nismo/fuel-pump-skyline (276l/h)

http://www.nengun.com/hks/fuel-pump (280l/h)

i reckon one of those 2 (i like nismo over hks) would be good to feed the surge tank, than a big yank pump feeding the fuel rail :P

You dont need to go that fair Noel...

A good old Bosch 044 fitted in the tank with a raising rate reg will do the job and keep it legal...

that's dodge/cheap and you know it col lol

why play on a knife edge with a big $ engine combo for the sake of a few hundred on a fuel system, it's a no brainer in my opinion

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...