Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

in fact i like these brakes so much I bought another set for the other car on the weekend. 356mm set this time, with a minor adjustment to the dogbone adapter we got it to fit under our weds 17" wheels too

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just wanted to post somewhere in here that I have now had the opportunity to use the "race" pads that Just Jap sell for the G4's. I have standard rear brakes with BEndix Ultimates in there and find that not only is there no bias issues, I have fixed a bias issue that I believe the car has from factory. I was regularly cooking rear rotors and pads before but now it all runs fine. Lap times are down and the car stops amazingly. I was regularly braking far too early due to being used to the standard setup. With the addition of good tyres and these brakes I knocked 3 seconds off my previous pb at Wakie.

Thats awesome. You were quick before from memory, so you are into the 1:07s or something now? Though i have to ask, what tyres? Tyres are worth 2-3 seconds at Wakefield, so be interesting to see you run the same tyres as you used to and see if there is any difference in lap times at all. Thats not to take away from the fact that the car is much easier to stop and nicer to drive.

1:11's on new enough RE55's and 1:08.5 with old 2nd hand slicks. My shocks are totally stuffed so if I can find some money for a rebuild of them I will go and have another crack. I nearly came in my pants every time I did a 1:08 so imagine how excited I'll get if I pull a 1:07.9999999!

So you are 2.5 seconds quicker on old slicks compared to relatively new semi slicks? That goes agaisnt the trend of typical time improvements for tyres. I suspect the RE55s were cactus as i would have thought a 250rwks R34 on RE55s would be quicker then 1:11s? Slap some new suspension in and decent RE55s and i suspect you will match/better then slick times!?!?!??!?!?!

LOL, actually no. Sober at present :) Just getting dumber by the day. :P You did you say "With the addition of good tyres and these brakes I knocked 3 seconds off my previous pb at Wakie"

LOL...sorry, just saying thats huge, but with swaybars in the mix as well it starts to paint a picture that makes more sense :)

Oh damn, maybe I forgot to mention the sway bars.

From my hazy memory I was running mid 1:11's with RE55's, then high 1:11's with sway bars, brakes and streeters, then mid 1:08's with sway bars, brakes and old slicks.

  • 4 months later...

Hi all great read, r33 gtst - anyone had clearance issues with wheels 356mm kit 18" wheels tried spacers still no good might hav to get wheels machined a little, tried two sets of wheels speedy inferno 18x8, and ROH drift R 18x8.

cheers skuzzas

I've run the 365 brakes under 17" rims without spacers, so it is the design of the rims that matter not the diameter.

In particular rims with "dish" just won't clear good brakes

Just re-reading the above, i cant believe how brakes can bag you 3 seconds, especially around a track like Wakefield. I mean think about a car that is 3 seconds slower at the drags and the distance between them when they are travelling over 150km/h. I cant see any brake upgrade allowing you to pull that sort of time difference from simply slowing the car a few meters deeper under brakes

In particular rims with "dish" just won't clear good brakes

The problem with Drift Rs is that they have "cheater dish" - where the end of the spoke curves in before contacting the barrel. It's the only way high offset wheels can get any lip at all.

Roy, I believe the tyres would have had a huge impact on the time.

Brakes to improve your time as long as you use them correctly and get on the gas quicker. Your lap times will slow if you are heavy on the brakes and hard on the acceleration because the distance you are covering at speed is reduced dramatically compared to a proper entry and exit with a constantly increasing throttle.

I agree regarding tyres, but i have simply read too many articles and have fiddled with enough brake setups to confidently say that the difference is on the 4th lap when you simply have too much car for the std brakes and everything is getting toasty hot

The only major improvement i think you see with bigger brakes is consistancy. SO a 3 seconds over a number of laps i can easily believe. Over a single lap, being your best lap of the day.... well i am just still a little sceptical of such claims.

Suspension setup and tyres play a bigger role in stopping distances then the caliper/rotor arrangement. There are many back to back tests that show stopping distance improvements of less then a car length from std equip using good pads and fluid compared to big dollar Brembo/AP/Alcon setups. Where the big setups help is that they operate at lower temps so are more consistant

  • 4 months later...
I've run the 365 brakes under 17" rims without spacers, so it is the design of the rims that matter not the diameter.

In particular rims with "dish" just won't clear good brakes

Any idea if they will be able to be run with 33 gtr wheels + spacers? Or am i better of getting the 330mm g4 set-up? :down:

cheers

Grab the 356mm setup and if your 17's dont fir then get some TE37 or something that have better brake clearance

So your saying go for the 356mm set-up, the 330mm doesn't really add up as an effective upgrade? I was hoping to not upgrade the wheels, everything adds up so violently.. motor, turbo, fuel set-up :D the wallet.

Going to measure the diameter of the wheel today, hopefully that's all Il need a 20-30mm spacer should stop it from hitting the spokes (as it's not a dished rim the spokes are set out more to the outer edge of the wheel), will report my finding

In the grand scheme of things the 330 and 356mm setups are pretty similar in price. And considering you have a big heavy GTR with plenty of grunt i think you are really better served with the 356, especially since there is a range of 17" wheels that will swallow them. Just need to flog off your current wheels to help fund the better 17" wheels.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Harness is for a s1 Rb25det, and it is engine and lower harness.  the old harness had broken off plugs and was in very rough condition/exposed wires and splices etc. it is not able to be put back on the car, I could visually inspect to see if they had rewired any pins on the ecu plug. The fuel pump definitly isn’t turning off it’s an external pump and very loud you can hear it. Will look at the other harness tonight, am also going to pull the fuel rail and watch the injectors spray, will update here with what I find. Pretty sure at this point it has to be something to do with injectors because car will fire up on starting fluid and cas is clicking the Injectors. Fuel pressure is steady 43psi 
    • Check the injectors flow evenly, and are actually flowing what you and the ECU think they should be flowing. If it's starting up on starter fluid, you have a fuel issue. Is it possible under cranking your fuel pump is turning off?   The harness you replaced, is that the whole engine harness? Do yourself a test, and drop the old harness on and plug it into the Z32 ECU. It's possible they've wired things different. From memory S1 to S2 is different in RB25 and you may have a wrong loom
    • I haven’t pulled the injectors to watch them spray yet but they are clicking from the cas and all of the spark plugs are wet with fuel. I’ve thought the cylinders were being flooded from the beginning and was hoping fuel pressure would fix it. Tonight I am going to pull the rail and watch the injectors spray. Don’t know how to test/diagnose if the plugs are firing in correct sequence but that should be a timing thing and as far as timing goes my car still has the half moon for the cas can only install it 1 way. And my mechanical timing is 100% correct I posted photos above. Confirmed with the balancer on and off. 
    • I checked spark on all cylinders and they all visually have spark with the plug pulled and grounded, but plug 1 is the only one that fouled. This was a running swap that blew up and was rebuilt by a machine shop, put a new wiring specialties harness and did all gaskets, studs, and bolts while it was out.  compression is 135-150 across all cylinders. Aside from that from my understanding with the z32 ecu and maf the car should start regardless. The wiring for TPS and the dual 02 sensor/ dual knock sensor stuff shouldn’t actually stop the car from starting or even running well, (just slightly rich)  they just give fault codes. Car supposedly is supposed to start as long as you have z32 afm and ecu with the nistune base map and that’s info coming from a well known and trusted tuner who does a lot with SR/RB (Rsenthalpy). After more trouble shooting today where I’m at right now is that the cas is sending signal to the injectors they click while spinning the rotor, Fuel pressure is now set at 43psi, all cylinders have good compression and all of the plugs looked great (just wet with fuel) except for cylinder 1 which was very black (cylinder 1 has 150psi compression). all of the coils generate spark if pulled out and grounded out on the head. On the fuel pump car just pops into the exhaust. On starting fluid car will fire off. Hard to tell if all cylinders are firing off but definitley a couple. sounds like all of them but it’s only for 3-5 seconds hard to tell. 
×
×
  • Create New...