Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I find it amusing how the skyline community have internal arguments about which Nissan Skyline is better.

From all the other car clubs/forums ive seen/read neither have this issue lol

You'll never see the xr8's downsizing the xr6's on FordForums or the 325i's dissing the 318's on bmw

Guess the skyline community wont function as one until the maturity level steps up a notch.

Why nissan even bothered to make a 6 cylinder 2 litre engine is beyond me.

lol^^ yeah cause nissan designed the 2Ltr 6cyl when the 2.5Ltr 6cyl was around :P

Obviously nissan wanted to produce a different engine for their skyline generation and decided on 2Ltr 6cyl. They saw how successful it was and built ontop of it to create newer engine for R33.

If the R32 did not exist and the R33 was the first, no doubt it would have come out with rb20 as that was their starting engine .

Going back to the original question;

R33 will no doubt be faster than r32 in standard form due to the 2.5L engine

- Patrick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3145197
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why nissan even bothered to make a 6 cylinder 2 litre engine is beyond me. It just added unnecessary weight to the 32. They already had some brilliant 2 litre engines laying around and should have used one of them.

As for looks, Every time i see a 32 I look for a backward baseball cap in the near vicinity or in the car itself.

The 33 is far more classic coupe design and will be the most timeless of all of them in the long run including the 34. (guess which one I drive) :P

Umm. FJ20 is a great engine. Nissan replaced the FJ with the RB20 and went racing with it. In Gp A trim the R31 made more power then the DR30, and the RB20 actually won the 1990 ATCC against the Sierras, VLs and M3s. From a racing point of view you have more bearing surface area, smaller lighter pistons and rods meaning engine will rev better, had to be 2L to be competitive in the turbocharged Grp A regs, any more displacement they had to carry more weight.

With the R32 GTR they went 4wd and only then bumped up displacement of the RB when there realised they werent going to be able to package the 4wd car into the desired class for racing. Remember at this point in time the larger turbo couples like Supras had sucked, and the lighter M3s and Sierras were the class of the Gp A fields.

It cracks me up when ppl walk around with their blinkers on :(

LOL...when i see an R33 i instantly run in fear and stand back to the wall as most R33 owners are sodomites. The rest hand out boiled lollies to little children at primary schools. :w00t:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3145203
Share on other sites

i remember the day that me and my mate both got our cars on the same day...one of then got a non turbo supra, the other got a 32 gtst and i got my 33 gts25t....well we all had a drag while driving to town.....and we all were stock....i cained both the 32 and the supra.....so i will say that 33's are obiviously better then 32's....well done Nissan for the RB25DET

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3147707
Share on other sites

dont you all think its a bit sheepish/childish comparing the R33 and the 32.. does it really matter if the 33 is quicker but can be outhandled by the 32?

anyone who owns either one of those two will surely modify some aspect of the car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3148474
Share on other sites

Ok guys, I want to test this out for myself. Here's the rundown, I own a R33 GTS-T with a bag of mods; frontmounted incooler, haltec ecu, bosch fuelpump, 3 inch HKS exahust, HKS FC, HKS booster controller, forged pistons just to name a few.

Anyways, a got mate that owns a R32 GST-T, another mate owns a Honda Integra type-R and another mate who owns a Toyota Soarer. Anyways, we decided to test this out. A mate of mine has family up in rural Vic, down the road from where he lives is a very straight piece of road. We took turns, lining our cars up last weekend.

My R33 left all of the above for dead. As per request, I had to put this discussion to rest. Lined up my mates R32, killed him on third gear. The R33 has more topend power and is lethal on 3rd gear. It foolish (unless heavily and I mean heavily modified) that anyone can say a R32 is faster on the fly than a R33. No chance.

A lot of R32 owners loves their rides and will argue until the dawn that R32's are just as fast. No chance in hell.

However, the R32 does indeed have slightly better handling, especially on corners PLUS I like the R32 as when you drive it, you feel more compact, and you make turns more swiftly.

At the end of the day, all Skylines are great. I've really had enough of this VERSUS bullshit. All Skylines are great!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3152207
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, all Skylines are great. I've really had enough of this VERSUS bullshit. All Skylines are great!!

+1

everyones ride is their pride and joy and no matter what the facts state anyone and everyone will argue that their car is better then the models up or down.....end of the day "All Skylines are great!!"

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3154133
Share on other sites

+1

everyones ride is their pride and joy and no matter what the facts state anyone and everyone will argue that their car is better then the models up or down.....end of the day "All Skylines are great!!"

That's right... you know mate. When I see a skyline lined up to me, whether it be a R31, R32, R33 or R34 GTS / GTS-T or GT-R - to me its a Skyline - respect.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3154516
Share on other sites

R32 v R33 is always going to be a big debate.

if it's the GTS-t models, R33 is the better mechanical car

If it's the GT-R, I'd go the R32 personally. Just more pedigree.

If it's the GTS-4, R32 hands down for turbo as standard.

If it's the other non-turbo models, well, who cares really.

I went for the R32 based on the fact that I don't like the R33 rear end, but that's just me, although given the option, I'd still get an R34.

I guess the reason that the R33 vs R32 debate is never solved is that they have very different "Personalities".

R32 was a quantum leap in terms of sports cars. It took the world by storm, and the R33 just... didn't. It's a great car, but didn't have the success of the R32 or the R34.

A big part of the R32's success is it's track record. True, the track GTR's have little in common with the street going gts-t's, but it's still the same base model.

The R33's success has been largely attributed to being the R32's younger brother.

In terms of modern skylines, the R33 is the middle child, between the older R32 who is the family favourite to the R34 which is the baby of the group.

the next skyline will probably prompt many R34 vs (new model) GTR debates.

In the end, both cars are great, but who ever keeps a skyline standard? when you pick between an R33 and an R32, all you're doing is picking the canvas on which to make your art.

On a side note, I realised that I must have been damn bored to write all this.

pity me.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3154613
Share on other sites

:( 1/4 mile times for a stock 32 and 33 gts-t are very similar, 33 is about .1 of a second quicker, so i guess the 500cc more the 33 has makes up for the 80-100kg more the 33 has.

Also series 2 r33's are acceptable but series 1? dammmmmmmmm camry/magna things

Also r32's with non type M front bars look very plain ._.

Moral of the story is get a valiant i believe..

Have i just PO'd every GTS-T owner posting in this thread :sorcerer:

Edited by r32 gts-turbo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3154881
Share on other sites

Ok guys, I want to test this out for myself. Here's the rundown, I own a R33 GTS-T with a bag of mods; frontmounted incooler, haltec ecu, bosch fuelpump, 3 inch HKS exahust, HKS FC, HKS booster controller, forged pistons just to name a few.

Anyways, a got mate that owns a R32 GST-T, another mate owns a Honda Integra type-R and another mate who owns a Toyota Soarer. Anyways, we decided to test this out. A mate of mine has family up in rural Vic, down the road from where he lives is a very straight piece of road. We took turns, lining our cars up last weekend.

My R33 left all of the above for dead. As per request, I had to put this discussion to rest. Lined up my mates R32, killed him on third gear. The R33 has more topend power and is lethal on 3rd gear. It foolish (unless heavily and I mean heavily modified) that anyone can say a R32 is faster on the fly than a R33. No chance.

A lot of R32 owners loves their rides and will argue until the dawn that R32's are just as fast. No chance in hell.

However, the R32 does indeed have slightly better handling, especially on corners PLUS I like the R32 as when you drive it, you feel more compact, and you make turns more swiftly.

At the end of the day, all Skylines are great. I've really had enough of this VERSUS bullshit. All Skylines are great!!

All very interesting. But last time i checked we were on a wonderfully green and blue earth, not hell. You havent addressed the simple fact that R33 owners are all of dubious sexual orientation. R33s are known to be susceptible to germs and disease and often end up pink with 20" chromies, yellow leather and more fibreglass then a catamaran. The roof line is good on foggy mornings as with such a high seating position bird strikes become a real concern, but hey, the fog is all the way down there.

Then there is this whole RB25 thing. Nissan threw cheaper and weaker pistons and rods at the car...and thought to themselves, hell we have thrown all this weight at the unsuspecting Nissan enthusiast, we better given them displacement so they dont notice the extra lard. So throwing a weaker engine in the heavier car fitted well with the deisgn intent Nissan had for the R33 GTS25t, they knew most were going to be painted pink and get chrome wheels. So knowing what the owners had in store didnt bother with making a decent car.

I know the above to be true. If you doubt it then you can line up your

...R33 GTS-T with a bag of mods

against my lowly R32 GTSt. The loser has to run down the drag strip at Calder on Friday night naked with their old fella chock a block up a chicken.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3155672
Share on other sites

:) 1/4 mile times for a stock 32 and 33 gts-t are very similar, 33 is about .1 of a second quicker, so i guess the 500cc more the 33 has makes up for the 80-100kg more the 33 has.

Also series 2 r33's are acceptable but series 1? dammmmmmmmm camry/magna things

Also r32's with non type M front bars look very plain ._.

Moral of the story is get a valiant i believe..

Have i just PO'd every GTS-T owner posting in this thread :sorcerer:

Haha valiant, you loose. Valiants were povo slow boxes when they come out of the factory let alone 30+ years later. Valiants were one of the most unsuccessful cars ever to race at Bathurst. I can't believe the finish of valiants... Very rough to say the least I mean no carpet or trim on the doors on some of the earlier models, even holden could get that right.

Roy, generalizations of people due to what car they drive is stupid. How can you insinuate that someone is a sexual devoid just because they drive a 33. No respect for you buddy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3156579
Share on other sites

All very interesting. But last time i checked we were on a wonderfully green and blue earth, not hell. You havent addressed the simple fact that R33 owners are all of dubious sexual orientation. R33s are known to be susceptible to germs and disease and often end up pink with 20" chromies, yellow leather and more fibreglass then a catamaran. The roof line is good on foggy mornings as with such a high seating position bird strikes become a real concern, but hey, the fog is all the way down there.

Then there is this whole RB25 thing. Nissan threw cheaper and weaker pistons and rods at the car...and thought to themselves, hell we have thrown all this weight at the unsuspecting Nissan enthusiast, we better given them displacement so they dont notice the extra lard. So throwing a weaker engine in the heavier car fitted well with the deisgn intent Nissan had for the R33 GTS25t, they knew most were going to be painted pink and get chrome wheels. So knowing what the owners had in store didnt bother with making a decent car.

I know the above to be true. If you doubt it then you can line up your

against my lowly R32 GTSt. The loser has to run down the drag strip at Calder on Friday night naked with their old fella chock a block up a chicken.

:):laugh::D

Best post of the thread!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3157243
Share on other sites

All very interesting. But last time i checked we were on a wonderfully green and blue earth, not hell. You havent addressed the simple fact that R33 owners are all of dubious sexual orientation. R33s are known to be susceptible to germs and disease and often end up pink with 20" chromies, yellow leather and more fibreglass then a catamaran. The roof line is good on foggy mornings as with such a high seating position bird strikes become a real concern, but hey, the fog is all the way down there.

Then there is this whole RB25 thing. Nissan threw cheaper and weaker pistons and rods at the car...and thought to themselves, hell we have thrown all this weight at the unsuspecting Nissan enthusiast, we better given them displacement so they dont notice the extra lard. So throwing a weaker engine in the heavier car fitted well with the deisgn intent Nissan had for the R33 GTS25t, they knew most were going to be painted pink and get chrome wheels. So knowing what the owners had in store didnt bother with making a decent car.

I know the above to be true. If you doubt it then you can line up your

against my lowly R32 GTSt. The loser has to run down the drag strip at Calder on Friday night naked with their old fella chock a block up a chicken.

this post explains why r32's are slower than r33's

not only does r32's have rb20's under the bonnet, they also have pricks behind the wheel. :)

pricks that think they are better because they got a uglier and slower car....very similar to commadore drivers

Edited by ztuned
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3157559
Share on other sites

so i guess you wont have any trouble going againts Roy then. Seeing as he has a slow ugly r32.

this post explains why r32's are slower than r33's

not only does r32's have rb20's under the bonnet, they also have pricks behind the wheel. :)

pricks that think they are better because they got a uglier and slower car....very similar to commadore drivers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3157759
Share on other sites

so i guess you wont have any trouble going againts Roy then. Seeing as he has a slow ugly r32.

:)

lol at u guys!!

time to do frank costanza's relaxation technique - "serenity now......serenity now"

if that doesnt work use Kramer's/George's technique - "hoochie mama....hoochie mama"

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/3/#findComment-3157782
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
    • Short inlet runners cost quite a bit. Dulls off the off-boost torque, and delays boost onset, because arrival of boost is driven by gas flow is a product of the ability to flow air which is torque. This is the reason that the stock manifolds have longer runners. On a 3L, or bigger, you can usually accept the compromise of giving away some torque because the extra capacity gives you a little extra to waste. But on a smaller motor, there's not a lot there to start with. Example, I swapped RB20 out of my R32, 25NeoDET in its place. The "wall of torque" that I experienced afterwards made it all worthwhile. That's because I came from RB20 land where torque is not a thing. But I would not do anything, anything at all, to reduce the low/mid torque I have now, because I remember what it is like to not have it!
×
×
  • Create New...