Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have the same problem. The guy who had the car before me put on a huge SARD dumpvalve and removed the re-circ system. Due to the dumpvalve being rusty etc the car now wants to stall when i come to a standstill and have to give it a small blip on the throttle to sort it.

No dumpvalve wont do your turbos any favours.

Gez

u made the same mistake i did, everytime i lift off the throttle the RPMs would drop so low that it would stall everytime i clutch in.

this is caused by a blocked BOV or no BOV at all. plump it back or let it vent properly and ur probz are solved

the car was tuned when i had a bov, i like the extra throttle repsonse i get from having no bov so i'm getting a tune soon and hopefully that will fix it, garret also proved that bov's do very little to prolong the life of a turbo.

the car was tuned when i had a bov, i like the extra throttle repsonse i get from having no bov so i'm getting a tune soon and hopefully that will fix it, garret also proved that bov's do very little to prolong the life of a turbo.

Dont understand how you get extra throttle response.......Do you know what bov suppose to do.

u made the same mistake i did, everytime i lift off the throttle the RPMs would drop so low that it would stall everytime i clutch in.

this is caused by a blocked BOV or no BOV at all. plump it back or let it vent properly and ur probz are solved

Lol whatever, i have a BOV venting to atmo that is working 100% and i have the same problem. Though it happens very rarely. FWIW it never happened before i fitted the BOV.

Cars that use an AFM need a properly recirculating blow off valve to run properly, there are heaps of tricks to get around this, but they are all bandaids. There is no dowmside to doing it the way the factory does it, except you lose the "wank" factor.

Lol whatever, i have a BOV venting to atmo that is working 100% and i have the same problem. Though it happens very rarely. FWIW it never happened before i fitted the BOV.

Driving style is but one of the tricks that can counteract it :P

Cars that use an AFM need a properly recirculating blow off valve to run properly, there are heaps of tricks to get around this, but they are all bandaids. There is no dowmside to doing it the way the factory does it, except you lose the "wank" factor.

As above with the tricks :sleep:

Ways around it, but best to go with the OEM equipment (or GTR items if you need to)

I would say get the car tuned with no BOV or put one on there for now until you get it retuned, and to be frank you will find with a Plumb back you will find the turbo will spool quicker because it doesnt have to argue with air comming back at it, try it see how well you speak with air being rammed down your Throat. It works trust me :sleep:

Is say theres a lot of "thinking" in this thread. Ash, get the car tuned and ignore most of the advice here....

Cars that use an AFM need a properly recirculating blow off valve to run properly

Ever seen the 180's that Nissan never fitted bov's to...or did they just make thousands of factory defects? :dry:

Is say theres a lot of "thinking" in this thread. Ash, get the car tuned and ignore most of the advice here....

Ever seen the 180's that Nissan never fitted bov's to...or did they just make thousands of factory defects? :domokun:

it does need a tune, i've been meaning to get one for a while but i don't want to get one until i get my cams and valve springs installed.

Also to the guys who are bagging the idea of not having one on there just try it and then tell me if you don't notice the difference, also as i mentioned earlier they do not prolong turbo life as proved by garrett.

it does need a tune, i've been meaning to get one for a while but i don't want to get one until i get my cams and valve springs installed.

Also to the guys who are bagging the idea of not having one on there just try it and then tell me if you don't notice the difference, also as i mentioned earlier they do not prolong turbo life as proved by garrett.

Quote Garrett

'The Blow-Off valve (BOV) is a pressure relief device on the intake tract to prevent the turbo’s compressor from going into surge. The BOV should be installed between the compressor discharge and the throttle body, preferably downstream of the charge air cooler (if equipped). When the throttle is closed rapidly, the airflow is quickly reduced, causing flow instability and pressure fluctuations. These rapidly cycling pressure fluctuations are the audible evidence of surge. Surge can eventually lead to thrust bearing failure due to the high loads associated with it.'

I've had this problem since I've had my car, I've just always blipped the throttle before it stalled.

For what it's worth, these are the things I have replaced for other reasons - Not to solve this issue, however mabye it will cancel some things out;

R32GTST, Stock internalsm stock BOV

Fuel Pump (Bosch 044)

AFM (standard R32 Green label)

RB25 Turbo

Splitfire Coil Packs

Cleaned Air Regulator

Spark Plugs

Fuel Filter

Maybe my BOV is blocked, I'll clean all that out tonight when I am chasing my boost leak

Dont understand how you get extra throttle response.......Do you know what bov suppose to do.

I do. :)

A bov is there for emissions and drivability. It hurts response as the turbo must refill the fmic and its pipework.

You obviously haven't tried no bov?

IF what garrett state *causes thrust bearing failure* a mate of mines VLT wouldn't have cracked 200,000km's on its STOCK JOURNAL bearing turbo while pushing 12-13psi for many years prior.

Have a read of - http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_1457/article.html

Simon from Nizpro is well respected within the industry.

---------

Ash,

Your going to have to do what Sinista has done, lengthen the afm to turbo pipe. OR step the size up to a 4" 90degreeish bend. Only way your going to get around it. :banana:

Shaun also recommends no bov; get him to tune it out, he may also recommend the inlet pipe mod.

Also..... Does your AFM still run its mesh? This helps prevent stalls also *in my experience*.

I do. :thumbsup:

A bov is there for emissions and drivability. It hurts response as the turbo must refill the fmic and its pipework.

You obviously haven't tried no bov?

IF what garrett state *causes thrust bearing failure* a mate of mines VLT wouldn't have cracked 200,000km's on its STOCK JOURNAL bearing turbo while pushing 12-13psi for many years prior.

Have a read of - http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_1457/article.html

Simon from Nizpro is well respected within the industry.

---------

Ash,

Your going to have to do what Sinista has done, lengthen the afm to turbo pipe. OR step the size up to a 4" 90degreeish bend. Only way your going to get around it. ;)

Shaun also recommends no bov; get him to tune it out, he may also recommend the inlet pipe mod.

Also..... Does your AFM still run its mesh? This helps prevent stalls also *in my experience*.

hopefully shaun can tune it out as i can't really lengthen my pipe if i wanna keep the standard airbox. The afm is missing mesh on one side (was like this when i bought it)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...