Jump to content
SAU Community

Good Power On Stockish Boost? Possible?

LatinR33

By LatinR33,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Medium Dave Proficient

Medium Dave

Posted
Posted

when I had my 32gts4 I dynoed it at 110kw atw (basically stock), but fast enough for me over a twisty mountan pass (and quick enough to keep up with a friend in a gtr - ok mabey he was holding back a bit because he had my girlfriend in the car, but she was still sh!tscared)

LatinR33 Experienced

LatinR33

Posted
  • Author
Posted

well im just really asking if its even possible to have 180kw with low boost using the right equipment?? Just curious. I was reading one the import magazines and it was going on about a consevative way of modding and it said that the point on modifying a turbo would be be trying to the most power out of it using the least amount of boost increase. So hence why I was asking if its even possible to have good numbers with low boost.

Nismo_God Veteran

Nismo_God

Posted
Posted

dont know why you would want to buy a new turbo to run 7-8psi.....run the stock turbo with stock boost controller with a decent exhaust, split dump pip,hiflow cat, 3" system, pod should get you to around 170kw.....raise boost to say 10psi which is still safe and you will have what u are looking for......this is alot cheaper then upgrading ur turbo, cause u would have to get an exhaust anyway....my 2 cents....

mesmerized Mentor

mesmerized

Posted
Posted

i got 188rwkw with hybrid FMIC, HKS pod, turbo back exhaust w/dump pipe on stock boost @ uas dyno day last weekend. apparently i have a 'freak car' :sorcerer:

when i had the boost controller on previously, it ran 202rwkw at 11psi

Nismo_God Veteran

Nismo_God

Posted
Posted

damn you.....there are others with good figures from light mods

only changes i have made are

turbo back exhaust

just jap fmic

boost controller

202.6rwkw. Hit 11psi 2300rpm, got to 12psi by 4500rpm for a bit and dropped to 10psi by redline....

LatinR33 Experienced

LatinR33

Posted
  • Author
Posted
damn you.....there are others with good figures from light mods

only changes i have made are

turbo back exhaust

just jap fmic

boost controller

202.6rwkw. Hit 11psi 2300rpm, got to 12psi by 4500rpm for a bit and dropped to 10psi by redline....

WTF????? is that all you got?? No aftermarket ECU?? That car must be running rich as hell.

LatinR33 Experienced

LatinR33

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

your kidding thats awesome man!!!! Is that your R33 in the pic doing the monster burn out?? I was under the impression R33 ECU's were the cars weakest link and the first think that needed to go. keeping the stock ecu in your case is mad cause its protected well due to ecu's protection in regards to running rich. Is this common for a boosted R33 running 180-200rwkw to run on a stock ecu well like yours. Or is your R33 some kind of freak of nature!!!

Edited by LatinR33
Nismo_God Veteran

Nismo_God

Posted
Posted

yeah it was at the drags....put on some old stockies and sat there for a bit...

i dont know too much about whats normal, or much about r33 ecu's being new to the scene but it seems to be going good. again not sure what others are running with stock ecu...some guys said i should check if it has been modified or chipped....but i really dont know too much about it....just fiddled with boost controller to set it up and chuckedf it on....

LatinR33 Experienced

LatinR33

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sounds to me your cars just a freak of nature cause I dont think the R33 ecu can be chipped or modded. Thats mad!! Some other guy here I just read got 188kw's on just an exhaust,fuel pump and power fc!!! thats nuts I know Dyno's figures arent exactly accurate but thats still alright :P Must go good regardless.

jeffworld2 Veteran

jeffworld2

Posted
Posted

i had 195 with exhaust and intercooler on 10psi stock turbo. even have the airbox in there. it just happens. maybe its just cars from the south west lol. it was running very rich, but still made a reasonable power curve, with the exception of a massive hole at 6-7krpm. but still 195 lol.

since fitted exhaust cam gear, power fc and a few other jazz and with 12psi got 188 at the uas dyno day lol. put bosch 040 in the other day and will tune it again tomorow and see what i get, before fanging it on the skidpan on saturday :unsure:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By Kapr · Posted

      Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • GTSBoy
      R32 GT-R: 4WD Light Turns On After Bumps – Code 19 (ETS Motor) But No Issues Found

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Bireley_32
      R32 GT-R: 4WD Light Turns On After Bumps – Code 19 (ETS Motor) But No Issues Found

      By Bireley_32 · Posted

      Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...