Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i c... dunno about you, but I myself wish I have an AWD car, much improved wet handling compared to RWD....

u gotta take out both the fuse and the front shaft, otherwise you might break something, like burn the transfer case.

I have installed a switch that runs inline with the 4WD fuse. I use it all the time and have seen no problem for the last year of using it.

Of course, the ignition has to be off before the use of the switch will take effect. (ie: no alternating between 4WD and RWD on 'the fly')

If you don't wish to install a switch, simply remove the 4WD fuse from in the engine bay. And no, ABS is not affected by this.

Guest Dragon

There is another 'trick' if you wish to 'try' running it in 2WD mode 'without' pulling the fuse.

Drive along the road, say about 40km/h (Make sure the turbo is cool for this) push the clutch in, coast along, switch the engine off (Must be in a straight line, clear of ALL traffic. Hit the kill switch on your turbo timer if you have one.)

Once the engine has died, switch back on and start. (Do this while still coasting along)

Let out clutch and you will be in RWD mode.

PRO's: Instant change on the fly to RWD. No need to pull fuse. Can test to see what it is like quickly in RWD mode.

CON's: Disables ABS/HIACS. ABS/HIACS lights will come on. AWD system will engage again once you stop moving forward!

How this works in this............

When you start the car (R32 GTS-4/GTR) the ATTESSA (Spelling?) system tests itself. Normally when you first start a car, it is NOT moving, soo all sensors report back that all is fine and dandy.

But, if you start the car WHILE it is rolling along, then the sensors report there is a problem! Shuts down AWD and goes into RWD mode.

If you have ABS/HIACS fitted, these also will shut down.

I have tried this on a R32 GTR and it works a treat! It 'should' work on a R32 GTS-4.

Have fun!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...