Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes the car was up to operating temp and running and it was steady at 18mm HG. There was no change in idle speed and no change in 02 reading to indicate additional hydrocarbons, i used consults to dignose.

I have tested the ic form the turbo to TB, held 50 psi no loss.

I did also spray all the IC connections and IC itself, no change.

Edited by WogsRus
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes the car was up to operating temp and running and it was steady at 18mm HG. There was no change in idle speed and no change in 02 reading to indicate additional hydrocarbons, i used consults to dignose.

I have tested the ic form the turbo to TB, held 50 psi no loss.

I did also spray all the IC connections and IC itself, no change.

Did you pressure test the plenum? Open the throttle body next time you do the test so it pressurizes the plenum too, so if there's a leak in there you should be able to hear it.

Well, myself having not actually had a look inside an RB before, in theory that sounds correct. But should they be both open at the same time at any time?

You don't have an adjustable exhaust cam do you?

Either way, If there's a leak somewhere, then wasted air = wasted fuel.

there is a certain amount of valve overlaop on the exhaust stroke from memory, i will rotate the cams to get the beast seal and see.

I agree that wasted air = wasted fuel, but it's a bitch trying to find it. LOL.

i will get another mates guage just to make sure mine is correct. The stock guage sits about half way between the bottom line and the first line from the bottom. so about -5 or what ever it is.

Green means GO, Red means Go SLOW, lol.

Well my drive to work is 8 minuts at best, and i live in hobart which is hill central so it's hard to stay of boost all the time.

I do give it a squirt now and then, but not like i'm going sideways evewhere.

When my wife drives the car, she gets no better ecconomy then me, so either the car is screwed or she's a lead foot. LOL.

Edited by WogsRus

wind your boost down. you are using more fuel because you are running higher boost. the more air you put in the more fuel that has to go in to keep the afr's the same. you would probably benefit from a tune, but you still won't be able to get the fuel economy of someone running 10psi because they aren't putting as much air past the afm.

Arround touwn i run 10 or 7 psi depending, and ecoconomy stil shit. The tune was done at 15 psi and rechecked for lower boost levels and all showed to be fine.

Anyway tune next week so interested to find out what it is.

Corinne says:

As much as I'm not a fan of the PFC, you should get one. - That's because you can't tune them properly wink.gif

You should use one device to control one element, at the moment you're using 2 devices to control one element. Not smart. They tangle each other up.

That and you may have lost your map in the SAFC - SAFC's are shit to tune.. they are very rough.. you can never get those flat spots out of them.

Corrine, PFC are frigging annoying to tune off of that little hand controller, especially when attempting to use map tracer at the same time to look where the engine is sitting, and then adjusting that!

And I never said the SAFC was good, I said it was possible he had lost his map from it.

Corinne says:

As much as I'm not a fan of the PFC, you should get one. - That's because you can't tune them properly wink.gif

You should use one device to control one element, at the moment you're using 2 devices to control one element. Not smart. They tangle each other up.

That and you may have lost your map in the SAFC - SAFC's are shit to tune.. they are very rough.. you can never get those flat spots out of them.

Corrine, PFC are frigging annoying to tune off of that little hand controller, especially when attempting to use map tracer at the same time to look where the engine is sitting, and then adjusting that!

And I never said the SAFC was good, I said it was possible he had lost his map from it.

Who the heck tunes off the hand controller? You use the datalogit, a laptop and a wideband to tune them properly.

Edited by KeyMaker

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...