Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

for a straight conversion i'd hit up hills motorsports.

they do good work with conversions and are pretty well priced.

as for costs, i'd be looking at an r33 rb26 if you dont want dramas down the track so you may be up for around 10k for a decent motor, loom, ecu and piping as well as other custom work that may be needed to be done.... + labour.

so it pretty much isnt worth it realli?

hills motor sports great i'll see wha ttha say

but realli stock you get 230 rwkw out of it and i onli want max 280 rwkw so is it worth it>????

is it simpler to buy another car cause i love my car but its a 93 model and its kinda showing its age ya know

tell me what u blokes think.

10 g's for that motor onli i'll see if i can get em in jap sumwhere. what about the 32 rb26 bottom end?

arggh..

p.s hills motorsport? whats their number?

Edited by Zas)-(

10k would get you over 250kw out of the rb25 rather easily. you would probably get a rebuilt rb25 to 280kw for cheaper than the cost of putting a rb26 in, and it would be more reliable as you would know exactly the condition of the motor.

lol greg at autoport. my mate did his rx conversion there and he took them to court over it because it died on the track

so im pretty hesitant to go there atm mate

rb30 bottom end, now would normal mechanics be able to bolt it on or would i need to gets hills a call or another performance engineered mechanic :D

i like the rb20 idea, except i think you need to fix oil squirters??? whats involved in that?

say a cost of what 5 grand would be sweet for the rb30 conversion>

Edited by Zas)-(
For 280 id leave the 25 alone and throw bolt on's at it, and maybe cams if you felt that way inclined.

Best post in the thread by far.

No need for the RB26 for only 280rwkw. Its massive cost for not a lot of point other than "hey, i have an RB26"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...